HN user

nsns

4,632 karma

"The best way of hiding something is by saying it clearly" (Eihei Dōgen)

Posts349
Comments347
View on HN
en.wikipedia.org 9y ago

Historiography of the Fall of the Western Roman Empire

nsns
3pts0
www.sueddeutsche.de 9y ago

Das ist das Leak

nsns
2pts0
www.theguardian.com 9y ago

Wingsuit flying's most deadly summer leads to soul searching

nsns
1pts0
www.theguardian.com 9y ago

Hanjin Shipping bankruptcy causes turmoil in global sea freight

nsns
2pts0
www.theguardian.com 10y ago

Alphabet unveils robot dog capable of cleaning the house

nsns
8pts3
www.npr.org 10y ago

Poor Lonely Computer: Prince's Misunderstood Relationship with the Internet

nsns
2pts0
www.reddit.com 10y ago

We are the investigative journalists who worked on the Panama Papers AMA

nsns
1pts0
qz.com 10y ago

A tiny forest tribe built a DIY drone from YouTube to fight off illegal loggers

nsns
4pts0
whiskysponge.com 10y ago

Whisky: The Past and the Possible

nsns
2pts0
www.theguardian.com 10y ago

How newsroom pressure is letting fake stories on to the web

nsns
2pts0
www.newstatesman.com 10y ago

Leader: Tax and the social contract

nsns
2pts0
medium.com 10y ago

Data journalism is changing the balance of power #PanamaPapers

nsns
2pts0
news.ycombinator.com 10y ago

Ask HN: The “New” page – bug or feature?

nsns
1pts2
www.newstatesman.com 10y ago

Burner phones and mysterious encryption: how is Isis communicating now?

nsns
2pts0
www.theguardian.com 10y ago

Snowden: FBI's claim it can't unlock the San Bernardino iPhone is 'bullshit'

nsns
4pts1
arstechnica.com 10y ago

Oculus Founder: Rift Will Come to Mac If Apple “Ever Releases a Good Computer”

nsns
11pts3
www.irishtimes.com 10y ago

Google moved over €28bn through State in tax scheme

nsns
1pts0
timshorrock.com 10y ago

Cryptome’s searing critique of Snowden Inc

nsns
18pts1
www.theguardian.com 10y ago

The Independent gave me some of the most exciting times of my career

nsns
2pts0
www.nytimes.com 10y ago

How a Medical Mystery in Brazil Led Doctors to Zika

nsns
1pts0
www.washingtonpost.com 10y ago

India, Egypt say no thanks to free Internet from Facebook

nsns
1pts0
www.theguardian.com 10y ago

WhatsApp drops subscription fee to become fully free

nsns
2pts0
www.nytimes.com 10y ago

The Rise of Hate Search

nsns
6pts0
www.theguardian.com 10y ago

I went to help at Calais’s Jungle refugee camp – and what I saw haunts me

nsns
57pts51
www.theguardian.com 10y ago

Edward Snowden Meets Arundhati Roy and John Cusack

nsns
11pts0
www.women-inventors.com 10y ago

Hedy Lamarr's Invention of Spread Spectrum Technology

nsns
3pts0
www.theguardian.com 10y ago

Setting a country alight: Indonesia's devastating forest fires are manmade

nsns
2pts0
www.jpl.nasa.gov 10y ago

Black Hole Has Major Flare

nsns
30pts4
www.theguardian.com 10y ago

Four more carmakers join diesel emissions row

nsns
6pts1
www.thehindu.com 10y ago

82-hour Internet ban on Eid fuels anger in Kashmir

nsns
1pts0

There's a certain common expectation one has from any UI. This doesn't exist for me with anything Google - be it search, Youtube, Android, etc. - my first thought is always 'I'll need to fight it to get the results I'm looking for.' That's how they roll.

Firstly, on a personal note, I must say getting heavily downvoted on a factual statement and not an opinion is a new and confusing experience for me.

My comparisons were made several years ago using LAME 320 CBR, LAME VBR, OGG, lossless (WAV) 16bit 44.1kHz and lossless (WAV) 16bit 48kHz. I believe at least most professional musicians and sound engineers would be able to identify the difference between all of these; while they might not always be "worse", their sonic character is certainly different.

It all depends on how sensitive you are to these things, I've done such blind tests, and to my ears the fall in quality was significant, even painful.

    I have a taste for the secret, 
    it clearly has to do with not-belonging; 
    I have an impulse or fear or terror in the 
    face of a political space, for example, 
    a public space that makes no room for the secret. 
    For me, the demand that everything be paraded in 
    the public square and that there be no internal 
    forum is a glaring sign of the totalitarianization 
    of democracy. [. . .] if a right to the secret is 
    not maintained, we are in a totalitarian space.
(Jacques Derrida, in Roudinesco, Jacques Lacan & Co., II, p. 599.)

Well, I think there's something deeper going on here; the strength of the nation as a juridical entity has been seriously weakened; rich multinationals - corporations and individuals alike - are no longer bound by it, refugees are an obvious exception to it, and since the neo-liberal revolution, legislation also tends to be mostly global-minded; which leaves the normal citizen - now a "prisoner" of his or her place of birth - with few options. It seems only natural that new forms of existence in a post-national world would slowly come into being (instead of a naive populist, nostalgic ultra-nationalist turn).

But what if the common folk in each nation finally realizes its national leaders have become, in essence, multinationals, just like Google and Amazon, with all that this entails regarding their actual agendas and worldview?

I think all this talk about the legality of using such services misses the point. It's about legitimacy, especially that of state leaders. While the western media might try to use it to delegitimize some non-western leaders, the leak actually works both ways.

Any country leader who'd make a speech to tell her (or his) people she doesn't care about them or their country, would do nothing illegal, but would probably loose her power. It's the same here - the leak serves as proof that the national Elite in many countries is no longer "loyal" to its imagined community (aka nation).

Well, a community needs certain borders to become one; these may be implicit, but they certainly exist here. What's special in this forum, imo, is the level of discussion and the willingness to listen carefully and to react thoughtfully, and not its realization of some utopian ideal freedom (which probably would have destroyed it as a community).

Yet again, an online community is obviously not a nation-state: one has chosen voluntarily and consciously to participate in it, and could always decide to leave and go elsewhere.

Well, you could say that advertising companies are actually in the business of tempting their clients into advertising by promising them the ability to tempt the general public into buying their products.

The problem imo is that, ever since Google has paved the way, monetizing an online product has become fixed on a single, double-edged strategy: either show ads or sell your users' data to advertisers.

Instead of a sisyphean refutation of every attack, wouldn't a better strategy be to research and prove the attacker's conflict of interests (and thus discredit them)?