notsound

Most European hosting providers don't KYC. Infrastructure providers are rarely held liable for customer actions in Europe. Most enforcement around this sort of thing is around sanctions violations (Stark Industries).

"simply block all routing out of the country" is doing a lot of heavy lifting. For government networks, sure. For civilian networks? It's a bit like stopping pirates from ripping video; how do you deal with an attacker that ultimately can gain some form of access? Even in North Korea external media can be smuggled in.

Those groups care about whether millions of computers are vulnerable, likely including your computer. If "immediate public disclosure" was done in all cases every vuln would be exploited and patches would be much lower quality. Shortening the disclosure timeline might be a good idea, 90 days is starting to feel long.

I got a 10 out of 10 because I've seen these strawmans in center-right arguments before. Definitely promotes thinking inside the box; the homelessness question presupposes the most expensive solution (buying the homeless homes) in opposition to annual costs that would probably go down over time. I doubt both figures.

If you thought covid fascism was bad why wouldn't you care about this? Was covid fascism so tolerable you'll let the government do more fascism?

Were they Evolv? https://www.theverge.com/2024/4/2/24119275/evolv-technologie...

Found this aswell, I would make it more clear that guest searches are public.

Another option that allows for better privacy and versatility is the website setting a MIN_USER_AGE header based on IP geolocation.

At $44b, he could have offered over a hundred million people $420 EACH to join. Obviously it's waaaay more complicated than that (KYC, actually building the platform, being profitable, etc...), but with that amount of money you could probably make something significantly better and more profitable than twitter.

Try using old.reddit.com; for some reason the block doesn't apply.

Instead of spending a bit money to build quality and low maintenance facilities on land, politicians seem to like the idea of using barges as housing. Particularly ridiculous example: https://apnews.com/article/britain-migration-bill-passes-bar... The idea that this is better than building the same thing on the undeveloped land AT THE SAME PORT THEY HAVE THE BOAT is absurd. Water eats everything.

Raise the alarm with convincing evidence. Nobody is going to do anything if you don't bring evidence to the table (as you say, makers are woefully unaware of this). If you're just trolling, I highly recommend this defcon talk on how to do it better: https://youtube.com/watch?v=vcAHbvTlpKA

You've mentioned this a couple times. I don't have an opinion on the subject, and a random comment doesn't really tell me anything. It would be good to link some solid studies so people can understand the risks. If you don't have those, maybe reconsider your point.

I think this is the most disgusting fossil fuel ad I've ever seen: https://youtube.com/watch?v=AI2zKNNoUic

When you wrote this argument, you're surely referring to what they actually said right?

Cuba and Russia are pretty close, and I don't think there is a lack of pro-ukraine talking points.

I've never seen an instance of that happening. Could you send some examples of cartels owning banks or having a significant amount of control over them?

I think it's mostly the name and phrasing, but it really does sound like a vaguely comedic line from some old sci-fi show.

I don't think we need new technology for that.

Could you elaborate on this statement? Approximately how many people do you think fit into this "worse at everything" category?

Did you talk to a lawyer about this? This situation sounds really suspicious (where they trying to illegally fire you?).

Certified mail might get through to someone important. Not super cheap, but potentially worth it.

While interesting, this is just the word's origin; the comment you're responding to is claiming that the auto industry made jaywalking a crime. That claim seems to be based in fact: https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-26073797

I value the freedom to not die because medical care is too expensive over the freedom to profit off of the sick.

KF also doxxed and swatted a lot of other people. Of the 3 people who committed suicide in no small part because of KF, how many tortured animals?

This isn't constructive (or relevant). Are there any specific technologies or ideas that the lighting network could contribute to this article?

They also cite themselves within that citation. That second citation contains a citation also written by them. Citationception!

You didn't read the article. This is mainly customer complaints, safety issues, and internal processes. Also, read the actual policy your article references; they aren't suing people for patent infringement (which is kinda cool), but they also haven't released anything. (aren't patents public?)

Yes, considering it's still fun to play.

Some psycho with a generic SUV and no license can easily kill a couple people. It's so easy people do it accidentally all the time.