HN user
The Three Gorges Dam has already given us 22 more microseconds in the year. Basically, the Chinese have converted the angular momentum of every molecule on Earth, including you... into electricity.
You're making this up to justify subscription model guilt. Nobody (besides those on here) EXPECTS this. In fact, most would rather live with the risks than deal with subscription model, let alone the headaches of updating and it breaking everything (i.e. causing a chain reaction that you have to update EVERYTHING in order to fix a small non-issue).
I, in fact, do NOT want continuous maintenance. Ever. I will literally never turn on auto-updates for the rest of my life.
When done properly you don't even notice!
This lame argument should be added to the List of Fallacies. It's used everywhere as a "wild card" argument.
Makeup
MLB Pitch Framing by catchers
Surveillance States
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallacies?useskin=vect...
What if I see a browser being "behind" as a benefit? (CVEs excepted)
It's already a feature (click the link domain).
What ever happened to μC/OS?
Seemed both well documented and well suited to have taken over for the current MCU explosion. I almost never see anyone talk about it.
Looks like it open-sourced in 2020.
what model LLM are you?
Paywall site purposefully trying to crash browser tabs of adblock users.
iBeacon. They know what shelf you're standing in front of. What products you touch and read.
Ever been in an Apple store? Look up. In the dark voids between the edge-to-edge backlit ceiling. There are secrets there. Watching you.
This will pair nicely with the eps8266 i just flashed after ripping it out of a Wyze plug that required I download their app, updating my operating system first of course, make an account and agree to their privacy policy.
Why is it still called Xcode, if they abandoned the name OS X?
ps. default chrome is no longer a valid user agent, by pure definition.
screenshots aren't 'proof.' and haven't been for a long time, neither was i ever looking for 'proof'. wow, the amount of webdev butthurt at someone's website who criticized webdevs is astounding.
I'm not gaslighting you. Are you just willy nilly accusing me of lying that nothing was covered up in MYYYYY browser? What about Lynx? hmm? What a garbage community member you are.
IP over Avian Carriers
I just re-read the entire thing. It is good. You're misrepresenting or you need to check your browser settings.
No image blocks any paragraph, which even if it had, would be far more forgivable than modern web design. Do you consider any of Apple's modern product pages -- which "block off whole portions of" the page itself by scrolljacking and Clockwork-Oranging you to force you to watch their hypnotic marketing animations -- bad?
Let me guess, you want a site that is just a singular column of text, plenty of space for ad breaks, and 3/4 of your monitor is just whitespace on the left and right?
Joke lost in translation. He's implying those who engage in these types of nonsense release notes often add bugs instead of fixing them.
I read every single one. Any app that does this gets uninstalled and a nasty letter to software managers.
Don't underestimate the effort a software developer will put forth to create mountains of complicated automation and scripts if it allows them to be lazy. And they see no issue with this. So why would they see an issue being accountable for yet another agile cycle.
Rev number go up!
This should be illegal if auto-updates are enabled or eventual updates are forced. Not joking.
Nowhere else in society do we allow such self-serving laziness and unethical negligence (looking at you, purposely destroying backwards compatibility of APIs) at a professional level. Most other professions have steep legal consequences if they hide their actions or inactions.
Still not convinced it's not a honeypot. Would like to see concrete evidence.
I used, administered, setup, and customized many on prem gitlab instances for years. I gitlab doesn't memory leak, you're making that up. It's exactly as resource intensive as the number of resources you setup. Can't say the same for JIRA et al.
This comment makes me suspect this entire thread as some astroturfing for that other product.
I don't think this is productive, since you're so adamant [1] that "big C memory safe programs don't exist." I know for a fact they do. Most of the software you won't ever see. What do you think powers the most critical sytems in, say a fifth gen fighter, or the software that NSA relies on in their routers?
I'll give you a hint. It's neither rust- nor scrum-based. I'd rather change careers or retire than work another day doing scrum standups.
Not nonsense. Don't be reductive.
I've got a bridge to sell. It's made from watered-down concrete and comes with blueprints written on site. It was very important to get the implementation started asap to shorten the review cycle.
Unit tests does not make Software Engineering. That's simply part of the development phase, which should be the smallest phase out of all the phases involved in REAL Software Engineering, which is rarely even done these days, outside of DO-178 (et al) monotony. The entire private-to-public industry has even polluted upper management in defense software engineering into accepting SCRUM as somehow more desirable than the ability to effectively plan your requirements and execute without deviation. Yes it's possible, and yes it's even plausible. SWE laziness turns Engineers into developers. Running some auto-documentation script or a generic non-official block diagram is not the same as a Civil PE creating blueprints for a house, let alone a mile long bridge or skyscraper.
I see Gianluca Martino let arduino.com lapse/is squatting it. Maybe the experiment is done? Is Adafruit no longer #TeamArduinoCC ?
Tangentially related. Youtube web is now, as of the last month, strictly enforcing "referrer header" for embedded videos. Even if you spoof it, it doesn't always work. You can't navigate directly to "youtube.com/embed/<videoid>" to watch something without giving google some direct information.
Since when are public-facing error codes just lies?
"Oh Error 15 something went wrong, tee hee." "Oh Error 153 better try again, (got em, guys!)"
They operated for a while, before finally updating their FAQ stating this is intentional.[1]
[1] https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/171780?hl=en#zippy... " Provide a HTTP Referer header to enable video playback
Our Terms of Service require embedders to provide a HTTP Referer. If this information is missing, viewers attempting to watch embedded YouTube videos will encounter blocked playback and an error screen (“error 153”). These viewers will still be able to click “Watch on YouTube” to view the video on YouTube. Note that directly accessing the embedded player without an enclosing webpage or context (such as accessing it from your web browser's address bar) will typically not have a HTTP Referer and users will encounter the error screen; the embedded player is only intended to be used within an embedded context."