nitrix

I think it’s similar to telling children to look both ways before crossing the street. If you don’t explain why, they won’t see the point and optimize by not doing it. Instead, if you emphasize it’s for safety to avoid mistakes, that’s something Claude is trained to highly value and more likely to abide by.

I'm doubtful the venn diagram intersection of engineers and the world cup is as big as you think it is.

I’m the Alex mentioned in the acknowledgments, feel free to ask your questions.

Yes, the () operator dereference function pointers automatically for you for convenience. There's also the surprise that you can infinitely dereference function pointers as they just yield you more function pointers.

That is correct.

  int x, *p, arr[5], fn(), (*pfn)();

It's the intended way to read/write declarations/expressions. As a consequence, asterisks ends up placed near the identifiers. The confused ones will think it's a stylistic choice and won't understand any of this.

They're important conversations but people don't want to engage in them every second of their living lives. The point of entertainment is to be able to compartementalize and regulate.

If they do what you suggest, all the creativity that makes the platform attractive is going to flock to somewhere else.

Or people are just trying to not be reminded every second of their living lives that there's one conflict or another going on. TikTok is made in China and used worldwide. Not many things are relatable and relevant to a world wide audience.

That's fine. Not every platform has to work the same way and attract the same communities.

"The C standard library provides malloc/free/resize"

It does not provide a `resize`. You're thinking of `realloc` on hosted environments.

Okay, but put the panels on rooftops, not over that nice greenery.

That's a way to either get me to cancel my paying subscription or opt-out of all form of ad personalization out of frustration. I respect the hussle and am paying you; respect my user experience.

Delaying critical decisions in a project is crucial to making good decisions. They'll be made both by someone more informed (after learning all the complicated corner cases of the problem domain) and by a better developer (perhaps a future version of yourself).

Therefore, my advice is to pretend you're a junior developer and do things the most naive way possible. Allow things to stink, to repeat code and to support just what's needed, as if this was the absolute final complete state of the application. This may lead to eventual refactors and this is healthy as the focus will be on correcting existing problems instead of foreseen ones.

This is when you allow your senior knowledge and experience to do what's necessary to return to a state that's comfortable for a junior. It's counterintuitive, but at the scale of a large codebase, the occasional refactors ouweights the time wasted doing preventing design at ever layer. I actually have a similar stance about defensive programming and testing.

Since this might not be enough to appease your brain, keep in mind that abstractions are generalizations trying to encompass some common 80%+ of cases, but they're usually never perfect and leave behind edge cases with additional complexity. Unfortunately, composing abstractions is multiplicative. 80%*80%=64%. Do it enough and your whole application becomes unsupported edge cases, constrainted to fit within interfaces, functions and types not able to adequetly give you the results you want and, so, you go crazy down the rabbit hole, trying to desperately break it down into even more suitable abstractions, like that's going to help.

Pipelining is cool, though this could've easily just been a library with nice chaining and combinators in your language of choice (seems to be Go here).

These new Unity per-install fees could hit developers who aren't making money

There's a revenue threshold to meet to pay the fee.

C11 3.6p1 byte "addressable unit of data storage large enough to hold any member of the basic character set of the execution environment"

The width is defined as CHAR_BIT >= 8 (C11 5.2.4.2.1p1). The size, sizeof (char), is always 1.

Changes to the Standard usually happens as a result of defect reports (confusing details that implementation writers want clarity on) or vast enough general adoption (unifying how implementations were differently achieving the same thing).

You can read #13 of the Charter https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2086.htm

As for the audience, it's all the C developers, the open-source and commercial compiler implementations, vendors of libraries, tooling, services, learning material and everything else built in C; which is just innumerable.

Each Standard version released supersedes and obsoletes the previous versions. Intentionally, the versions are meant to be as backwards compatible as possible so that one can mix and match C89/C99/C11 codebases with minimum effort.

C has gained only a handful of features in the last 40 years. Compared to the great many things that are improved w.r.t. undefined/implementation-specific/unspecified behaviors, or removed to keep up with modern times (e.g. Trigraphs, Two's Complement integer representations, etc).

I'd say: (1) upgrading is not the spooky thing people make it out to be. Go, Rust, they all move much faster than this and have very ambitious big design ideas on their mind. (2) It's necessary to take good care of C as it, and the things built in it, will realistically outlive many of us.

This is off-topic for HN and not the kind of content I want to read on here.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

> Off-Topic: Most stories about politics, or crime, or sports, unless they're evidence of some interesting new phenomenon. Videos of pratfalls or disasters, or cute animal pictures. If they'd cover it on TV news, it's probably off-topic.

There's a time and a place. I'm downvoting.

Tesla stock plunges 250 dollars, all four shareholders survive.

The actual typo in the URL slug is on the nose too ("worlkd").

On a similar note, the screenshot should probably put emphasis on the first bullet point "Make profile private and hide activity".

What jumps to the eye right now is that second option checked, as if that's the new feature.

You have complete freedom.

Mhm... my suggestions:

A) Let the user find out the correct orientation.

B1) Make the snapping happen only on click/touch release.

B2) Make the snapping happen over a longer distance.

I ask this as a completely outsider to Prolog who has found some of the design choices in SWI-Prolog to be very arbitrary while I was trying to learn it. Some predicates were rather unsafe/error prone/not pure and didn't sit quite right with me.

Is that a result of the Standard and will Scryer follow those footsteps or are we going to see something closer to Mercury?

I really enjoy your channel and indirectly heard a lot of positive things about Scryer, so of course I'm super interested and would prefer if they don't get too stuck on trying to meet the "status quo". The "status quo" has a lot of room for improvement.

You mean Erlang?

How you learn C greatly impacts the code you will be writing.

The language allows too much freedom for a beginner and things can go bad quickly if you aren't rigorous about developing the right habits.

Years of experience helping people and seeing it happen first-hand is what leads to these strong opinions that you interpret as gatekeeping.

"Effective C" is usually what I recommend people nowadays on Libera #c, which is where that wiki originates from.

The books were triaged based on the feedbacks we heard, the kind of questions that are asked on the channel, or how confused those readers are after reading through them.

Police officers will often happily close roads for church or impromptu protests for the public's safety.

The bickering that's going on means someone has a hidden agenda, got their ego bruised or maybe the laws are just outdated and needs corrections.

Either way, people aren't great with change. Changes to the law takes a lot of time and often your request just gets ignored unless you literally force them to look at your issue.

Well, that's what they're doing. I have no problem with it, no one gets harmed, people are safer, laws will improve, it's just wins everywhere.

To add to that: that particular site isn't a cute preschool sandbox for children to go and play in.

We're talking about very active construction, large space rocket, launches, tanks, gasses, cranes, lifts and various other hazards.

At least they are being responsible and have people's safety in mind by controlling accesses. I imagine the local residents are well aware of SpaceX's operations and keep their whereabouts safe.

What is the alternative? No security guards?

Yeah no. I'd rather have my legal department battle it out with the authorities. They made the right call until the babies can all agree.

Yes, let’s do that: I, and the projects I’m involved in, have moved to Libera.

I watched the drama unfold and consider myself informed enough to develop my own opinion, which coincides with that of the staff.

It’s been a completely smooth transition and don’t see how Freenode will recover without these amazing people.

As for the “ridiculous statement” and the need to feel ashamed, I leave that to future me to decide. Not you.