HN user

nick007

743 karma
Posts28
Comments93
View on HN
twitter.com 5mo ago

AI's [Other] Existential Threat

nick007
5pts0
nickalexander.org 5mo ago

ClawdBot Ordered Me Lunch

nick007
4pts1
blog.startyoshi.com 8y ago

Yoshi (YC S16) Raises $13.7M from GM, ExxonMobil, YC, Kevin Durant

nick007
9pts0
www.recode.net 8y ago

Uber CEO says Travis Kalanick’s board move is ‘disappointing’ and ‘unusual’

nick007
3pts0
techcrunch.com 9y ago

Yoshi (YC S16) raises $2.1M to fill up your car, or wash it, anywhere

nick007
6pts0
bangordailynews.com 13y ago

Doctor stops accepting insurance, posts prices online

nick007
56pts48
elidourado.com 13y ago

What Would Democracy Look Like if it Were Invented Today?

nick007
48pts64
gethelium.com 13y ago

Show HN: We built a simple way to accept payments through Stripe

nick007
109pts78
thenextweb.com 14y ago

Freshplum scores $1.4M for its data-science driven analytics solution

nick007
8pts0
news.discovery.com 14y ago

Mystery "Space Ball" Crashes to Earth

nick007
6pts1
techcrunch.com 15y ago

How to Sell Your Company

nick007
53pts8
online.wsj.com 15y ago

Bill Gates' new startup

nick007
3pts1
techcrunch.com 15y ago

Facebook Location Patent Issues

nick007
3pts0
sports.espn.go.com 16y ago

PGA limits total volume of grooves allowed per square inch of a golf club

nick007
8pts5
news.ycombinator.com 16y ago

Ask PG: What would your next startup be?

nick007
58pts32
news.ycombinator.com 16y ago

Ask HN: SUS Videos--where are they posted/where are the best quality ones?

nick007
15pts3
www.washingtonpost.com 17y ago

A desktop client on the web

nick007
1pts0
www.techcrunch.com 17y ago

Music in the cloud comes to your desktop

nick007
5pts0
www.techcrunch.com 17y ago

Prepare Yourself For Ipod Video

nick007
3pts0
www.nytimes.com 17y ago

China Requires Censoring New PCs

nick007
2pts0
nickalexander.org 17y ago

My now open source class for using MySQL with PHP

nick007
1pts1
www.bluetunes.net 17y ago

Rate My App: blueTunes.net -- a cloud music service

nick007
24pts19
hookuphelper.com 17y ago

Ask HN: Rate My App (facebook connect)

nick007
3pts2
hookuphelper.com 17y ago

Ask HN: Rate My App

nick007
1pts1
www.nytimes.com 17y ago

CEOs using Youtube

nick007
1pts0
news.ycombinator.com 17y ago

Rate My App: Build Time = 342 Minutes

nick007
17pts42
blogs.harvardbusiness.org 17y ago

The Art of the Self-Imposed Deadline

nick007
1pts0
www.breckyunits.com 17y ago

Are you Making Something that will become ‘Absolutely Irrelevant’?

nick007
3pts0

Very thoughtful analysis. I particularly like the insight around the industry metrics and Goodhart's Law. “DAU” and the like align with social media companies’ interests of increasing attention and time on site, which lead to more ad revenue. But, they are at odds with their users’ interests, or at least don’t consider user costs (ie time). I wonder if a social product could thrive based on the principle of “efficient” usage, a la the platform works on my behalf to keep me efficiently informed on what’s going on in my network and considers the cost tradeoffs of my time and attention. I suspect I could feel very “up to date” on the things I care about most by checking into a social product ~weekly with a thoughtfully curated digest of content.

I am a PullRequest user/customer. I shared some of your concerns when I first heard about them, and was admittedly the least on board them trying them vs the others on my team. In short, I didn't believe that an outsider could provide adequate reviews and that, at best, an outsider would supplement our internal review process. I was wrong, and have learned several things about code review from this company.

1. Once ramped up, PullRequest provides consistent reviewers for project, even down to fairly granular sections of the codebase. i.e. we’ll get the same reviewer or sets of reviewers who review code for backend architecture changes, a different person (but consistent) who reviews security code even within a monolithic repo. These reviews feel like a real part of your team after a while, but fully focused on providing quality review.

2. It’s true that the reviews are not involved in initial planning conversations, but in practice this turns out to be moot or even a net positive. This is because they are providing a removed perspective on the review. I can think back to one time very specifically when the team planned to implement a feature in a specific way. An engineer went off and did so as had been planned by the team. An internal review from any of the original teammates who had planned the feature with him would have immediately approved the PR since it was exactly to the original spec. However, our PullRequest reviewer caught a MAJOR VULNERABILITY that the feature’s architecture had presented. Thus, a fresh set of eyes from an outsider who knows our codebase but is not involved in planning/implementation discussions was critical. IMO this is one of PullRequest’s greatest value-adds and why I will always advocate using them /other services like them no matter what team (though I don’t know of any comparable services, though I suspect more will arise and 3rd party review becomes table stakes, but that’s a different discussion).

3. The people that PullRequest gets to do reviews are top notch. In some ways, overkill from what would be required to actually develop a feature from soup to nuts, but it gives us more confidence to let junior developers run more freely on larger features knowing that they will have to pass code review from PullRequest.

I finished all the Missions in a few weeks, forget exactly the days. It could definitely be done faster but I spaced out one Mission every few days (I think there are 8 or 9 of them).

No videos, it's written content with questions to answer/reflect on.

There's also a way to write in to a real-life person/team with follow-on thoughts/questions after each section. I've done this a number of times not really expecting much, but have been blown away with how fast and thoughtful a response I've always gotten. Almost feels like you're getting personal coach (which they are really underselling IMHO).

DISCLAIMER - I am a customer.

I found Capsule very valuable. The content is 2nd to none, they boil down some huge concepts that span thousands of pages across multiple books/papers into dense and digestible bites of material. Very high bandwidth and efficient.

I see a lot of commentary about the price being high. I'm not sure whether they have the right price point or not, but what I would say as someone who considers myself pretty frugal, I would compare the value I got from Capsule to a series of books and probably therapists that would've cost hundreds or thousands of dollars (and many more hours).

I’ve really enjoyed using https://www.createcapsule.com/ for this. Has been helpful with everything from practicing better CBT, to relationship communication in both personal and professional settings.

They do an amazing job of condensing down a lot of material into very succinct and digestible lessons (aka missions). Everything is also referenced so if you want to deep dive into a specific topic you can.

The whole course is short enough to finish in an afternoon, or can also be broken down in 20 minute slots.

We don't have an API yet that something like automatic can report your gas gauge to. Though it's something we're thinking about.

However, the way that the service works now, it wouldn't save you anything in the average case. We come by and fill your car up regularly (usually once or twice a week) without you having to "order" when you need it. Unless you take a long trip and need a fill-up off-cycle, you shouldn't need to ever use the app to call for gas once you are setup.

Good question. We created a device (that we call a "Fuel Vault") that we can install in your car's "gas flap." We'll require that you leave your car's gas flap popped open for your first fill-up so that we can install it. After that, we'll be able to get into your gas flap anytime. It doesn't require any permanent modifications to your car, and can be removed anytime.