HN user

necolas

2,044 karma
Posts43
Comments107
View on HN
necolas.github.io 12y ago

Normalize.css 3.0.0

necolas
1pts0
nicolasgallagher.com 12y ago

Flexible CSS cover images

necolas
1pts0
nicolasgallagher.com 12y ago

A simple Git deployment strategy for static sites

necolas
5pts0
nicolasgallagher.com 13y ago

Moving from London to San Francisco (as a Software Engineer)

necolas
3pts1
github.com 13y ago

Finatra: A sinatra-inspired web framework for Scala

necolas
2pts0
html5boilerplate.com 13y ago

HTML5 Boilerplate v4.0.0

necolas
212pts51
necolas.github.com 13y ago

Normalize v2.0.1 - optimized for modern browsers

necolas
28pts13
necolas.github.com 13y ago

Normalize.css v1.0.0

necolas
146pts30
keyamoon.com 14y ago

IcoMoon demos multi-tone font icons

necolas
1pts0
twitter.github.com 14y ago

Ospriet: an audience moderation app built on Twitter

necolas
3pts1
www.guardian.co.uk 14y ago

How an angry maths blog sparked a scientific publishing revolution

necolas
6pts1
github.com 14y ago

Foresight.js - Another responsive images technique

necolas
9pts1
nicolasgallagher.com 14y ago

Another CSS image replacement technique

necolas
25pts2
nicolasgallagher.com 14y ago

About normalize.css: a modern, HTML5-ready alternative to CSS resets

necolas
219pts23
html5boilerplate.com 14y ago

HTML5 Boilerplate 3.0

necolas
52pts1
davatron5000.github.com 14y ago

DeCSS3: A bookmarklet for testing your graceful degradation

necolas
2pts0
camendesign.com 14y ago

NoNonsense Forum - No database, just RSS

necolas
4pts1
movethewebforward.org 14y ago

Move The Web Forward

necolas
126pts19
nicolasgallagher.com 14y ago

CSS3 Social Sign-in Buttons

necolas
70pts11
html5boilerplate.com 14y ago

HTML5 Boilerplate v2.0 released

necolas
267pts28
dropp.us 15y ago

Dropp.us: a location-based message/photo-sharing iPhone app

necolas
1pts1
necolas.github.com 15y ago

Normalize.css: An alternative to CSS resets

necolas
173pts45
www.guardian.co.uk 15y ago

LinkedIn shares double to signal dotcom bubble 2.0

necolas
2pts0
camendesign.com 15y ago

It's Time for Server-Side Browsers

necolas
47pts43
dev.opera.com 15y ago

Simple HTML5 video player with Flash fallback and custom controls

necolas
8pts0
www.newscientist.com 15y ago

The cyberweapon that could take down the internet

necolas
4pts1
www.guardian.co.uk 15y ago

BBC iPlayer apps spark online backlash

necolas
2pts0
nicolasgallagher.com 15y ago

CSS background image hacks

necolas
119pts8
modernizr.github.com 15y ago

Modernizr 2.0 beta released - customizable downloads

necolas
3pts2
camendesign.com 15y ago

RSS: A Reply (Author's follow up to "RSS Is Dying")

necolas
8pts4

Hey. I work at Twitter. I think that at certain companies the "front-end" role is not as specialized as assumed, and you tend to interview for a specific team that has an opening, rather than for a generic position among a hoard of similar developers.

Having said that, I'm surprised there was only one CSS question, and the suggestion to combine questions with front-end specific knowledge might be a good way to ease into the interview.

The analogies and conclusions are based on false assumptions about the driving forces and consequences of the "machine revolution". You can expect fewer jobs and the accumulation of more wealth concentrated in the hands of fewer people as a result of increased automation and the creation of more efficient "digital production lines".

Hi, I'm part of the team working on HTML5 Boilerplate.

As this featured project is, in some way, defining itself relative to what it believes HTML5 Boilerplate is and should be, I'm going to chime in with some thoughts.

If someone wants to create a new project after their concerns have not been shared by others maintaining a large, existing, community project (e.g., how Lo-Dash came to be) then that's fair enough. But I'm always disappointing to see people do so before raising their concerns and making their arguments. It would avoid the repetition of errors and discussions that have been addressed previously. We could also work together to adapt HTML5 Boilerplate if there is a good case to do so.

Once-upon-a-time, I didn't appreciate the work and community knowledge that went into HTML5 Boilerplate. However, after I started to open issues against the repo and contribute to the project, I realised that it has always been very open to contributions and changes of direction. I had significantly underestimated how much thought and combined knowledge was going into the project, and how much it was constantly evolving.

It's hard to design a useful starting template that's clear and friendly enough for newcomers, documented enough for explorers, and svelte enough for experienced developers. We're always trying to figure out the best way to present the value of the project while not scaring away too many people. Hopefully, we're doing a decent job of balancing those concerns and making people feel welcome in the discussions.

I hope that developers will continue to work with -- and look to join -- the people developing HTML5 Boilerplate at any given time. If you think something is missing or should be removed, make the case for it. We listen and learn; we're constantly evolving the project.

Thanks

------

> HTML5 BP is maintained by Google people. http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4949018

That's not true. Only Paul Irish works at Google.

> "Slim HTML5 Boilerplate" would be a better title http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4949635

If that's what you're looking for, just delete jQuery and Modernizr from HTML5 Boilerplate :)

I haven't had the experience that HTML is harder to maintain if you use classes more liberally. What this approaches forces you to do is: write or edit CSS every time you want a new combination of existing traits...which isn't ideal either.

The post also suggests that certain class names are "unsemantic", when they obviously aren't. They just have different meaning to the sorts of class names the author is advocating.

This is a hypothesis. IIRC, there is considerable variation in pigmentation in other parts of the world too. There isn't a direct mapping because other factors, like sexual selection (something not mentioned in the article), affect the phenotype of populations.

I've been wondering if Facebook will do general object and/or product detection in photos to help them match highly targeted adverts to the content (and location, season, etc.) of a photo.

Unfortunately, at the time when Ian didn't seem to care about the issue of responsive images, I asked him about the possibility of using the existing `<img>` element and he said it was pointless to try and modify existing image parsing. Forget it.

Now, he decides that actually this is the way to go. Frustrating.

For reference, in the email linked above, Ian Hickson said:

> So why not just give the UA the characteristics and a template to use to build the file names itself? That way we still give the UA all the same information, but it is much less verbose and still solves all the same use cases. Thus:

   <img src="face-600-200@1.jpeg" alt=""
        src-template="face-%w-%h@%r.jpeg"
        src-versions="600x200x1 600x200x2 200x200x1"></code>
OSX For Hackers 14 years ago

Yeah, I don't understand why this gist has been created. Just learn from Mathias's dotfiles repo which also has other useful settings.

Codename: Obtvse 14 years ago

> Just wait until Svbtle is finished and open to the public.

Does that mean it will be open to _anyone_ and no longer only to people considered to be "intelligent, creative, and witty"?

There are two significant problems with this:

1. The output CSS contains invalid or unnecessary code. Multiple classes on an elements are incorrectly handled, some form inputs (checkout and radio) are incorrectly referenced, and reference-only IDs are included.

2. The idea is flawed. Writing CSS and creating reusable components is not the same as filling in values for every element, class, and id found in your HTML.

You might find Lawrence Lessig's talk at Google interesting: How Money Corrupts Congress—and a Plan to Stop It

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ik1AK56FtVc

However, the article suggests that if some terrible legislation passed it would ignite people into real action. That clearly failed to happen when the Patriot Act was passed. I'm sure there are many more examples. If the discourse surrounding legislation convinces enough people not to care (or fails to make it into wider public awareness), then there doesn't seem to be much standing in its way.