HN user

nebula

1,078 karma
Posts59
Comments182
View on HN
www.techrepublic.com 8y ago

Windows face recognition fooled by printed photo

nebula
2pts0
blog.samaltman.com 8y ago

American Equity

nebula
509pts535
swarajyamag.com 8y ago

Twitter Censored Hashtags Critical of Hillary During US Presidential Election

nebula
16pts1
www.ted.com 8y ago

A global food crisis may be less than a decade away

nebula
2pts0
www.nytimes.com 9y ago

Chinese Citizens Evade Internet Censors to Remember Liu Xiaobo

nebula
3pts0
www.cloudyn.com 9y ago

Cloudyn acquired by Microsoft

nebula
2pts0
www.ted.com 9y ago

Neural pattern transmission across brains[video]

nebula
1pts0
thenextweb.com 9y ago

CNN accidentally broadcast 30 minutes of hardcore porn last night

nebula
88pts36
www.davecraige.com 10y ago

Magic – Not so magical – experience of an early adopter

nebula
2pts1
www.firstpost.com 11y ago

Uncle Sam may be indirectly funding religious conversion in India – Firstpost

nebula
5pts0
blogs.microsoft.com 11y ago

Microsoft buys Equivio, provider of machine learning based compliance solutions

nebula
2pts0
news.ycombinator.com 11y ago

Ask HN: Is it safe to perform credit card payments over TOR?

nebula
1pts3
rt.com 11y ago

Lockheed announces major breakthrough in nuclear fusion – RT USA

nebula
2pts1
rt.com 11y ago

Inspired by Scotland: Quarter of Americans want their states to secede from US

nebula
2pts0
rt.com 11y ago

​5M ‘compromised’ Google accounts leaked – RT News

nebula
13pts0
rt.com 11y ago

Single Americans become majority for first time – RT USA

nebula
3pts0
www.forbes.com 13y ago

Firefox OS Hits The Stores With A €69 Smartphone And A Disruptive Strategy

nebula
1pts0
sethgodin.typepad.com 16y ago

Seth's Blog: The coming melt-down in higher education (as seen by a marketer)

nebula
8pts1
www.sciencedaily.com 16y ago

Study Catches Two Bird Populations As They Split Into Separate Species

nebula
2pts0
www.facebook.com 16y ago

Intro to Facebook Search | Facebook

nebula
1pts0
sethgodin.typepad.com 16y ago

Seth's Blog: First, organize 1,000

nebula
7pts0
sethgodin.typepad.com 16y ago

How to protect your ideas in the digital age

nebula
4pts0
www.julianvossandreae.com 16y ago

Art inspired by quantum mechanics

nebula
1pts0
www.wired.com 16y ago

Google Begins Fixing Usenet Archive

nebula
41pts10
sethgodin.typepad.com 16y ago

Less than zero

nebula
1pts0
sethgodin.typepad.com 16y ago

Seth's Blog: Spare no expense

nebula
3pts0
www.ted.com 16y ago

Eric Giler demos wireless electricity (video)

nebula
5pts0
storagezilla.typepad.com 16y ago

The Dark Cloud: malware's cloud computing platform

nebula
1pts0
www.fourmilab.ch 16y ago

It's official: NASA is a jobs program.

nebula
86pts83
googleblog.blogspot.com 16y ago

Two views from the 2009 Google Faculty Summit

nebula
1pts0

The real answer is more sinister. Throughout the 19th century, South American slave raids took away as much as half of the native population. By 1877, the Rapanui numbered just 111. Introduced disease, destruction of property and enforced migration by European traders further decimated the natives and lead to increased conflict among those remaining.

OP said the following about AI SaaS providers:

You are using a “ready” product and so everyone gets the updates to model but your own modifications for the model are impossible with current providers.

I think this may not be true about Azure. In Build conference this year, they demoed cognitive service APIs where one can use transfer learning techniques, and train models and use them.

I know that there are some stories about bad experiences in the fulfillment centers, but keep in mind that those positions are temporary seasonal work by unskilled labor.

The tone of your writing suggests that you are OK with treating these people badly. If a company treats some set of its workers badly, what stops them from treating other employees the same way? In this case, they may treat SW engineers well because there is a lot of demand for engineers, and they have to be treated well to retain good folks. That is not comparable to the good culture that OP claims WF has.

Good thought :) When I put out the first version, I haven't really understood the consequences or its effectiveness; In fact it had my code name in the greeting :( When it first appeared, people found it amusing; but it quickly went out of control and kept appearing again and again. This annoyed people. I was in trouble. I had to quickly find a solution in that panic.

Reminds me of a tricky situation I got myself into :

When I was in college, I wrote a simple worm to display a new year greeting on all computers it infects. Once it infects a computer, it did the following: 1. it replicated itself to as many computers as possible 2. Displayed the greeting (till user acknowledges it through a key press) 3. self delete (in the hope that it will quickly die by itself)

I seeded it in one of the computers in our college network. I didn't expect it to be so effective; It spread itself very quickly in the entire network. With self-delete, I thought it would die on its own. I was wrong. Machines kept infecting each other in a perpetual loop. The only way I could stop it was to write a new version that replicated, and cleaned the first version. This new version kept replicating in the network even after a year. This new version was not doing anything visible to the user, and I was saved :)

The point when it became clear to me that Microsoft had lost their way was when they decided to get into the search business. [This was PG's view in the article]

In retrospect, this seems to be a wrong conclusion. I know Bing is far far away from Google; But I think that Bing investment was well worth it for Microsoft. If you have followed Build 2017 conference, it is obvious how Microsoft is leveraging AI/ML in several of their products; and of course, they have a good offering of cognitive service cloud APIs. Without their heavy investment in Bing, Microsoft perhaps would have found it hard to make such quick jump onto the AI/ML bandwagon.

As a side note, is Microsoft still considered a company on its way to oblivion? I personally think they reinvented themselves in the new era. Am I mistaken in my view?

Thanks for the response. I should have been more explicit, but when I said BTC n/w I meant a consensus sort of thing from users/miners. Thanks for your explanation regarding the need of a fork to achieve this even with consensus.

I am trying to understand impact of crypto currency. Sorry for my ignorance, and or impertinence. 1. Is it possible to run such large scale ransom demands without cryptocurrency? 2. Do we know if the attacker is using a single BTC wallet, or if ransoms are being collected in a distributed fashion. 3. Is it possible for BTC n/w to hijack BTCs going to the ransom wallet(s). That is to say collectively overwrite/override the transactions and may be reroute the coins to some non-profit wallet? I know it will be a very bad precedent, but I am trying to understand if it is technically possible.

Thanks a lot for the pointers. Many here have already pointed that I am buying too much into the "free market" propaganda; may be I was indeed brainwashed into buying that, but I am trying to open my eyes and learn. AFAICT, there seems to be strong correlation between wealth/prosperity of a nation and the openness of its economy. Are there any counter examples to this? Coming to back to the original topic, is it fair to say there is no strong correlation between development of science and freedom of thought? Well, it may be true if the state does not repress the ideas being produced under science; I can now see why that might have been the case under USSR, and even in China. Scientific thought being largely apolitical may not have to be repressed by authoritarian regimes. Any holes in this logic? Sorry for being naive!

I could be completely off the mark here, but is it wrong in my part to assume that China may not necessarily have the right environment for basic research to flourish? The way you mentioned the "China being excited" translates to "Chinese authorities deciding to push basic research". That will no doubt get human and other resources allocated for it, but is it sufficient? China, and USSR may not be a fair comparison, but I feel China is much closer to how the USSR functioned, of course with the added opening up of the economy, and probably economic freedom within the country (The two missing pieces that led to bankruptcy of USSR). Now, let me explain the reason why I brought this comparison here. USSR in its day probably matched the west in defence, and to some extent space tech, but did USSR produce any original major basic research breakthroughs? Basic research is not amenable to top-down push and needs an environment where ideas and expressions of those ideas have freedom. Anyway those are passing thoughts I had when I read your comment.

I can understand what he meant: Heavy use of antibiotics in diary and poultry industry is a significant factor contributing to drug resistant bacteria. In other words, these industries are actively providing the selection pressure you referring here.

This is probably a risky question to ask here, but let me ask it anyway: looks like most/all YC partners are rallying behind a particular candidate. Would this VotePlz effort try to help their favorite candidate in an indirect way? On the face of it, it doesn't seem like, but I would be skeptical given how partisan Paul Graham's political tweets had been.

new constitution, which favored closer ties with China over India.

Really? They have it ingrained in the constitution? If Geo-political situation changes, and they need to re-balance their ties? They are going to need constitutional amendments?

Nukes ready to fly 11 years ago

Very interesting that Pakistan, a much smaller country( by all measures) has a larger stockpile of nukes than its larger neighbor India.