namshe

Funny enough, I was consulting at WeWork the day he stepped down. Very interesting day. And agree, great case in point.

I did my part and voted for Harris, I thought maybe she had a chance. I knew it was very likely that Trump would win. That said, couldn't we all have done more?

For example, Trump and Obama have a few interesting things in common. They both became President. And they both defeated Hillary Clinton in order to get there. In 2008, the real race was between the Democrats - Bush was so unpopular it didn't matter who the GOP ran, the Dems were going to take it (in my opinion that's why McCain was allowed to get the nomination). America had the chance to do something really different multiple times and put a woman in charge but it never happened. Now it will almost certainly never happen.

In terms of voting to burn the place down, I think that's really the point a lot of folks have missed. When the existing system doesn't serve you at all, why vote to preserve it? Governments have failed us, totally. Both parties have kowtowed to corporate interests for years and things like NAFTA have had the effects that were warned about in the 90s. Now we are reaping the results.

Very sad state of affairs.

Good point - these could most likely be exploited as well. That's another way for the US to get there. Break up Canada. The Quebecois get to be their own mini-nation. Not sure what would happen to the Maritimes or Newfoundland. And it's not like Western Canada is uncontroversial, look how much people bag on Alberta.

The thing that would for sure not happen is Canada becoming an actual state in the US. Way too liberal for that and logistically it wouldn't make sense.

Where is "here?"

I think you're making a couple of shaky assumptions. You're assuming civil society will stand up to Trump. This seems increasingly unlikely to happen.

Also, in the military, there are really serious consequences if you don't do what you're told. It's not the same world as the civilian world. So if an enlisted soldier gets told to suit up for a mission, they'll do it.

Think of the Ukraine war. Many of the Russian soldiers thought they were on an exercise that day, they didn't realize it was a for-real invasion until they got the order.

Lastly, invoking that less than half of Americans voted for this just doesn't mean very much. Trump could have been kept out of office if enough people had gone and voted for Kamala Harris...but they didn't. The people who voted for Trump, hey, say what you like about them, but at least they went to the polls.

This mess is 100% the karma of all Americans.

My analysis should not be interpreted as an endorsement of the idea. I think the US annexing Canada is pretty high on the list of dumb things to do. Total waste of time and energy for very nebulously defined benefits.

If I put on my realpolitik hat though, it makes sense why Trump & friends want Canada, same reason they want Greenland: access to the Arctic. Look at a world map and how Canada and Greenland are placed relative to the US. Trump is a real estate guy and lots of land is always the best thing to have.

For Greenland, the United States has no need to flex its military muscle if they want to take it over. The Greenlanders want to be free from Denmark and this is a great opportunity for them to achieve that.

Possible timeline of events:

* Greenland leaves the Danish Realm

* Greenland becomes sovereign nation

* Greenland enters Compact of Free Association with the United States (similar to Kiribati and Micronesia) - boom, best of all worlds for the USA. Juicy real estate, military boost, a local indigenous population that will be able to do nil about it.

* With Greenland secure, the United States finds a pretext for NATO withdrawal.

* The United States either pressures Canada into joining the US or invades outright. European partners do not come to Canada's defence and NATO is officially over. Maybe a European version of it rises in the aftermath.

From there, hard to say what will happen. I would be worried if I was an Icelander.

I am an American but sadly it doesn't seem like it's outside the realm of possibility.

They sent troops to the southern border during Trumps first term? North is just the other direction. Mobilization takes time but they could do it.

It doesn't seem like there's much reason for them to do that?

Thanks, this is the kind of answer I was looking for. Appreciate it.

If there is a "war" between the United States and Canada it's going to be extremely short. There would not be a need to conscript anybody for it.

The United States would simply roll tanks and troops across the border, making it to Ottawa in fairly short order. Canada would then surrender, and the Stars and Stripes would be raised across all the provinces and territories. From there, Canada could consider itself officially annexed.

Correct, that seems to be the intent behind these policies.

I’m not even sure what we are trying to extract from Canada at this point.

Their energy, their focus, their attention. Your attention. All the time people spend in stress / outrage / fear / whatever in reaction to these events, that's time and energy not available to look at the news that get less coverage (which are usually the more important).

It also sucks all the air out of other internal political discussion - US trade relations take #1 priority and so everything else either gets forgotten or put on hold.

Easy way to set your opponents back when you have the upper hand like the US does.

Sounds like good intuition to me, thank you :)

Thanks for your answer, appreciate it.

Follow-up question - what's your take on using AI to maybe generate a driver for a different language?

Prediction: soon we will see the first vibes based billionaire. They'll have no idea what they did, what their product does, how it works, or any possible ethical implications of having developed it.

But they'll be fucking rich.

Very cool and fun project! I am a total dummy when it comes to this kind of hardware stuff and always admire people who do it.

A couple of questions:

* How / where did you get the inspiration for this? To me it's one of those things that seems "obvious" once I see it, but I wouldn't have thought of it on my own first.

* What does that thermal imaging camera "see?" Just heat? Could it detect a person vs. robot vacuum vs. house cat? (relevant for kitchen monitoring especially!)

* From the article, it looks like you're using Python? Are there good libraries available for other ecosystems as well?

How do you know someone is a European? They think therapy and mental health issues are a silly American "trendy" fixation.

I will put in a plug for Mercury: https://mercurylang.org/

All engineers should study the story of the Vasa. It happened hundreds of years ago but it could have happened today too.

This comment getting downvoted into the negatives is hilarious.

If you're wondering, just wait. It will soon become very very obvious.

They are on their way out, they understand what's about to happen.

You could do a lot worse than starting by reading this: https://www.orwellfoundation.com/the-orwell-foundation/orwel...

(since the world is not actually a pure function side effects from pure functions are in fact observable)

This one is so obvious and yet boy do a lot of people suffer from not having realized it yet!

Just wait until they find out about Tamagotchi!

Author and readers might enjoy this piece by Christopher Alexander - A City is not a tree: https://www.patternlanguage.com/archive/cityisnotatree.html

In some traditions it's not a hallucination taking place: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bardo