HN user

nahname

1,538 karma
Posts5
Comments468
View on HN
Fossil versus Git 6 months ago

Curious why you think Mercurial was a better product. I used it over a decade ago (coming off SVN) and it seemed to use a lot of similar concepts.

Ottawa was tricky because the jurisdiction belongs to the OPS, which fumbled the entire situation from beginning to end. It wasn't entirely clear if that was intentional either. The RCMP (federal) was brought in to break up the protests, but there was a lot of stone walling from the conservative provincial government.

There is also a world of difference between an organized protest with a specific purpose drawing awareness to a cause and thousands of people using commercial vehicles to hold a city hostage with no purpose or agenda other than a bunch of angry people unleashing their rage on the cities populous.

Rails Cheat Sheet 3 years ago

It's Active Record that makes rails code re-use especially unique. I don't know of any other framework where you can 1) be certain of the ORM 2) add database tables from a third party library 3) the whole experience not being cobbled together.

Rails Cheat Sheet 3 years ago

Ruby is practically the pseudocode they teach in schools. Which is selected for it's intuitive and simple nature.

Rails Cheat Sheet 3 years ago

It's a great tool for those that want to build CRUD apps quickly and get 99% of the things right. That speed comes from code re-use (mostly gems). Once you get experienced in rails, you primarily glue things together. It's fast, but does not feel rewarding.

Latency is important to sales and it hasn't been an issue for Shopify. In my experience, you need people that understand how to scale things more than you need a scalable language.

Something like this only works if your leadership team believes in it. If they give and receive feedback through the same system, align incentives to keep it going. Then this kind of feedback will thrive.

Your biggest expense will be people. Rails is ancient at this point, but I regularly see people ship product with it in fractions of the time. You can also re-write parts in rust later, when you need to.

1Password started and currently has a self-hosted option. They are actively migrating to a SAAS model to justify monthly subscriptions instead of licenses.

The master/replica setup is interesting because we did something similar at Shopify, but I don't believe this is conventional for redis cluster. Can you expand on that a bit? eg: Looks like master/replica are together on a host, wouldn't you want them spread out?

You are including proxies for clients and server? How do they compare to envoy? eg: Are you doing anything clever to handle failovers transparently for clients?

Is the metadata storage just using redis?

The clinic was morally wrong. Lying to their customers for surgeries they did not need is malpractice. This does not need to be solved by the federal/state government. The professional body should handle it.

Too many are... Some are built upon a novel ideas though. Can we build web apps like desktop apps? Can we use one language on the frontend and the backend? Can we write everything in java?

Rails was built upon the novel idea of, "Can we build a CRUD app framework developers enjoy using?". As there is no silver bullet, this comes with tradeoffs many do not want. Performance is not a first class citizen. Code is prescriptive. A lot of rails apps are just gluing together gems.

I will say though, if you are building a CRUD app. There is no other option that will get you to done faster than rails.

That's too bad. I worked at a dotnet shop when I learned rails (on my own) and it was night and day for me. ASP.NET is a poor framework that was tries to take the windows decktop app experience and port it to web. Turns out that is a bad idea...

Which frameworks do you recommend today?

It's hard not to become jaded when every framework turns out to be just another team's personal preferences. I would say the statement is generally true about frameworks, but not true about rails. Perhaps the author did not spend enough time with rails.

There are bugs. After 60+ hours of gameplay, I can say Cyberpunk is significantly worse than the Witcher 3 was at launch.

The thing is, on PC, the bugs are mostly visual annoyances or obvious lack of polish. Menu's not updating, UI glitches in cut scense, etc... I've had the game crash on me exactly once.

The core game has a great story. The side quests are unique and interesting. Characters have depth. Combat is surprisingly good. Cyberpunk has all the things I need to enjoy it and I did enjoy it.