muskstinks

I def also want to see continue progress and investing in space is only a problem in capitalism, which i'm not a big fan of anyway.

But it would be so much better if the person behind this would have more character.

With Raptor v3? The one they actually need to meet their payload targets? I thought that will happen in a few weeks.

Whats your source?

9 Million customers. I know a handful of people who use it as a secondary option who were everythign but 'left behind'

Thats not a lot of people.

And with the satelites risk and disruption to astronomy and the co2 usage, it might have affected more people negativly than positivly.

NASA gave SpaceX 400 Million just for the development of Falcon 9 and there is a video were Musk said SpaceX was bancrupt if NASA wouldnt have stepd in.

NASA also another 6 Billion upfront to SpaceX for Dragon and HLS.

So yes the american paid for the R&D of SpaceX.

SpaceX took the 'risk' but either succeeding or not in your main business is hardly a risk if you need to succeed anyway to have that business.

None of that makes sense.

Transportships even reduce speed to reduce costs.

If the payload doesn't pay for all of this, it was a huge R&D investmen from the american people to Musks scifi ideas

They are very good in finding money from somewhere to afford all of this.

If this doesn't play out to be reducing costs for the avg american, Musk was able to get funded by the american tax payer nicely.

They still need to prove that they can fire 33 of them in parallel reliable.

Time will show, plenty of ignorant decisions from Musk inbetween so yeah...

What 'new deal'? If you talk about Solar and PV, it adds value already independen of how little it is. Even dense city has roofs on top. Also they have highways which have plenty direct space next to them were no one wants to live or grow produce (due to polution)

germany stoped the investment and killed the solar industry. Not saying that China helped too, but we don't know if germany would have pushed through it without China.

If its a big market, SpaceX will have to share this sooner than later as plenty of others are working on this.

Nonetheless even in rural areas there is A LOT of coverage.

And starlink has one sig issue: its bandwidth.

For them to increase bandwdith they need to scale which is expensive and they have to reinvest every 5 years in replacing these satelites.

A fiber layed down can work for a lot longer and can be replaced a lot easier.

You will have a setup working based on solar energy and battery storage before you get spaceship to not explode anymore and to deliver low price for payload.

And we are talking about AI Datacenters, they are a lot less latency dependend than websites.

Alone the idea that Musk would be able to break through any burocrazy for space stuff and sets up a supply chain for everything space is easier than just setting up some energy and fiber, feels ridicoulys

Every city has phone lines. A phone line allows you to replace it with fiber. A fiber and a tower has long loves.

A star link server has 5 years.

Setting up a terrestrial network is already done and it was relativly easy because you build it up from most profitable to lowest profitable.

Star link only serves 9/10 Million people right now with already 10k satelites whith only a lifetime of 5 years and if this market is profitable, the margins will go down sign due to other competitors. Which are already working on it.

Star link is not a 'no-brainer' they currently have 9/10 million customers and need 10k star link satelites. One satelite costs 300k and works for 5 years.

To this, they need humans operating the space side, the base station, they need base stations etc.

It is affected by weather as well.

Its not a 'no-brainer' and while space x showed its somehow a business, amazon and others are entering this space now too. So they never had a first mover financial advantage making big bucks and others are coming which will drive customer base and margin down.

And data center in orbit is not just a pipe dream, its stupid on a whole new level. Smart would have been to build like a DC City in the middle of the USA were its super cheap and introducing the necessary infrastructure to it. But alone the R&D, the sending it up there, solving hard space problems just to not being able to touch hardware when it fails, man thats stupidity on a whole new level.

cable is still more stable than starlink. I have regularly issues on a teams call with starlink while it just works with cable.

And come on 100/10 is not bad despite the other 10gig fiber

Its my south/west balcony with a 1 square meter panel from some online shop. 400 watts, with an easy to install rail system for my balcony and a plug and inverter for ~400 Euros.

Independent of a cap, you don't pay 100% of your salary you pay a percentage. So at the end of they day, the afther still has more money left.

In texas there is a cap at $11.700 which will be $2k. Plenty of money left on the father side to provide better to the child.

And if you don't agree on the bias thing, how about you also bring up anything which supports your argument? Thats how an argument works.

Also you do know that there are 80% single mothers vs. 20% single fathers? 1970 it was btw. only 1%

If a man doesn't want to care for a kid, he doesn't has to while a mother has to. which elads to a wider spectrum of woman having to care for a kid.

Funny enough, i can't ven find a proper source for kids growing up better with a single father.

But i found this: "Children in single-father families exhibit worse behavior, and are slightly disadvantaged in terms of cognitive skills compared with children living with a single mother (Downey, Ainsworth-Darnell, and Dufur 1998)."

Nope our viewpoints are not the same like a coin with two similiar sides.

I let people do what they want to do without projecting something onto them based of my values. So my viewpoint is openness.

Yours is the complete opposite. You project your values onto them. You are forcing something which doesn't affect you onto others. You want to control them.

Its like people who have a religion/believe say you also have to believe while i say i'm not allowed to push you into something like this.

And in my eyes this is not bad behavior at least not from the information i have. I would be concerned if and only if the kid would grow up without any parent.

Nope just a normal server running 24/7, a condens dryer, a gaming rig and working from home (so display, lights and kvm switch running 8/5).

240kWh per month, 35cent per kWh and a base price of 10 Euros.

Please also read my comments with critical thinking and add my comment and its content to your own list of signals you trust :P

"they should be examining their life choices." based on your world view though. We became a very boring race only optimizing our lives for work. No alien race would look at us and think we are smart spending so much time doing things which do not add value to our society just because we can't organize ourselves better.

Just because we conditioned ourselves like this, doesn't mean its right or wrong.

And this article doesn't give us enough insight to even judge.

Birth control is not perfect. 99% is very little in comparision to the amount of sex happening in a population of 8 billion people.

There should be a cap in all states of child support. And independent of this, the person with a lot more income can do things the other person can't like getting a nani.

And lets be honest here: A single father is so rare that this alone raises eyebrows and questions. Ironically more like positive reactions and dismissive ones against the woman.

I would have a lot more money even with child support just because I earn so much more than my wife.

So in avg man earn more and have more carerse because they do not stay at home for the children.

Also guess who normally gets custody? Yeah the mother. So having a man getting custidy is not normal at all. This skews the data massivly.

So as long as we are not experts here but a group of men earning above avg, we might not stereotype and dismiss genders.

I didn't say "watch this without critical thinking".

The chance this is completly fabricated though is very low and its an highly interesting signal to many others.

There was also a really good AI CTF Talk at 39c3 hacker conference just 4 month ago.

No birth control is 100%. We live on a planet were very rare situations are getting published as 'news'. So the fact that you read this news, doesn't tell you anything shameful at all. You are just biased and don't even realise it.

And no you are not allowed to shame other people for their decisions if its not clear that there is a kid getting abused in any way. People are adults and not yours to criticsize if it doesn't affect you or a 3th entity which can't protect itself.

Its your personal opionion you can easily and should keep yourself.

There can be very small mutation which you might be able to find if it happened.

Ah yes other factors of misogynistics like potential men seeing a single mother as an issue why potential woman might not.

Btw. its also a lot harder for man to get the sole custody which means that only the most motivated and well suited men even achieve this probably also with an expensive lawyer.

Yeah probably because our patrichary is shit and woman earn a lot less money than man do which makes it easier for the man to pay for baby sitter, nanny, education etc.

Perhaps we fixup our society instead of blaming it to a woman?

You need to find a genome change if it exists which requires whole genome sequencing. so its a money question and doesn't guarantee a result

Why?

And why do we evaluate this on something like hn?

Are you shaming a person for having sex or?

Besides that i'm not reading x, what has this arbitary random tweet todo with antrophic, the yt talk about Opus quality Jump to find exploits no one else was able to find so far?

A theoretical random tweet and a clear demonstration are two different things.