HN user

muddi900

418 karma
Posts19
Comments424
View on HN
news.ycombinator.com 2mo ago

Ask HN: Can you tell the difference between Claude Sonnet and Opus?

muddi900
20pts12
thisiscriminal.com 2mo ago

Excited Delirium[audio]

muddi900
2pts0
news.ycombinator.com 5mo ago

Ask HN: How much are you spending on OpenClaw API calls?

muddi900
1pts2
news.ycombinator.com 8mo ago

Ask HN: A good launch plan for an indiehacker project

muddi900
2pts4
news.ycombinator.com 9mo ago

Ask HN: Claude Code Alternative

muddi900
2pts2
news.ycombinator.com 1y ago

Ask HN: How to Use "Deep Research"?

muddi900
22pts17
news.ycombinator.com 1y ago

Ask HN: Alternatives to WordPress for Personal Blogging

muddi900
8pts11
newrepublic.com 4y ago

Terrible Book Shows Why the Covid-19 Lab Leak Theory Won’t Die

muddi900
5pts5
makthis.substack.com 4y ago

Being Digitally Anti-Fragile Part 1

muddi900
2pts0
chapra.blog 5y ago

When did Apple become Microsoft?

muddi900
1pts1
chapra.blog 5y ago

How to Build an Egalitarian, Decentralized Search Engine Part 2

muddi900
1pts0
chapra.blog 5y ago

Empty Platitudes Plastered on Important Men

muddi900
1pts0
chapra.blog 5y ago

Search Is Dead

muddi900
4pts0
chapra.blog 5y ago

The Truth Is a Dour Mistress

muddi900
2pts0
itookabreakfromsearchenginesanddecidedtowriteaboutsomethingpersonal;curiosityhasmadememiserableanditwilldothesametoyou.https 5y ago

The Truth Is a Dour Mistress

muddi900
1pts0
news.ycombinator.com 5y ago

Ask HN: Would you pay for a Private Chat Room app with disappearing messages?

muddi900
4pts12
chapra.blog 5y ago

How to Build an Egalitarian, Decentralized Search Engine Part 1: The Principles

muddi900
3pts0
news.ycombinator.com 10y ago

Ask HN: Where can I find decent TeX/PDF templates for org-mode exports?

muddi900
1pts0
www.apple.com 10y ago

Apple's iOS security whitepaper (2015) [pdf]

muddi900
2pts0
Resetting Xbox 11 days ago

What is MS board doing? How did Xbox spend 70 Billion without C-Suite approval?

There seems to be no consequences for top management.

I bought a base iPad 2 qeeks ago.

At least with the cheaper models, you get deals at Best Buy and Amazon.

I wonder whether this will also inflate the used market. I could have gotten more for my trade-in.

We have to remember that for the vast majority of human history, keeping people alive and healthy was not a concern. Most medical interventions discovered during post-Industrial Revolutions did not require special technology.

It is only when human labor was needed at a large scale when we started caring about people living long healthy lives.

This is a good podcast on the old regime: https://www.npr.org/transcripts/696337392

Summary of the old regime: Mergers that lead to 5+% market share were blocked.

Then the "consumer harm in terms of prices" was adopted. Which swung the pendulum the other way. That is the fundamental economic policy now. Which has lead to abhorrent results.

I wrote a comment on previous post that was about how consumer harm standards have warped the discussion on tariffs: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48096236

The Capex and Opex requirements to do anything in the US are THE barriers to entry.

Nobody has that kinda cash lying around, banks can't justify such high liabilities, and VCs are not interested in "stable", businesses.

I find the discussion around tariffs in the US pretty weird. The people making the case for them right now sound like complete idiots at points and downright dishonest at other points, and the people making the case against them sound weirdly racist and classist.

It is partly because of polarization, but mostly because the US economic and policy discourse is centered around nebulous "Consume Harm", as measured in price.

The "for" camp claims:

1. Tariffs will bring manufacturing home overnight, 2. Everything import should be taxed, 3. And tariffs are being paid by the foreign exporter, so American consumers will be shielded from price increases.

All of these claims are lies. American business' biggest input cost is labor. By a long margin. Tariffs need to be much higher for manufacturing to be a feasible investment in most industries. Which means more pain for the consumer.

The 'against' camps argument all hinge on the fact these are filthy jobs for filthy foreigners and poors. There is no need for them in the US. Even if they are not focusing on that issue, they are talking about how taxing imports cause "Consumer harm" and therefore it is bad.

That is the crux of this post as well. The tariffs did cause price increases for consumer.

But if the goal is to increase manufacturing base in the US, then this harm would be irrelevant in the long term.

This obsession with "Consumer Harm" has poisoned all trade and economic policy in the US. It is the reason Anti-trust is toothless in the US, why every industry is an oligopoly, and why the rust belt exists.

Of course, protectionism is not the only ingredient needed to promote any given industry. China, Vietnam, Korea and India did it via robust industrial policy. Some might say US did so as well, during World War 2. But that is cOmMuNiSm now.

This is funny because it is an unfounded claim replying to the request for proof.

I can show you my git tree where GLM4.5 deleted my whole test suite and my session docs where it invented new github cli commands. Are you willing to show us where you saw me taking money from any US tech company?

I don't know why this was downvoted. It is a genuine counterargument, even if it misses some of the context.

The problem isn't that there are alternatives. The problem is that this sort of vapid human zoo has flourished and spread globally.

The only major culture that seems to have avoided it is China. And that's because they got addicted to even more vapid mobile livestreams.

My blog is a vanity project that nobody reads, and it seems to not be part of the training corpus. Claude in incognito could not recognize me.

Late to the party but first verse of Stan by Eminem:

Subject: Reaching out to a thought leader in the space

Hi Slim,

I’ve been trying to sync up with you regarding some potential synergies, but it seems we haven't connected yet. I’ve left my multi-channel contact info (mobile, pager, and landline) below for your convenience.

I initiated a couple of touchpoints back in Q3, but they might have been lost in the shuffle or hit a delivery bottleneck. I’ll admit my manual data entry can be a bit unoptimized at times when I'm moving fast.

Anyway, let's pivot—how are things on your end? Hope the family is doing well! On a personal note, I’m currently scaling my own family and expecting a new addition soon. If it’s a girl, I’m already locked in on the branding: Bonnie.

Also, I wanted to express my condolences regarding the situation with your Uncle Ronnie. It’s a tough market out there; I actually lost a close contact recently due to some personal relationship ROI issues.

I know you get high-volume engagement daily, but I consider myself a top-tier advocate of your brand. I’ve been following your journey since the early-stage "underground" days with Skam. My home office is essentially a dedicated showroom for your portfolio. Your collaboration with Rawkus was a total game-changer—truly best-in-class content.

Anyway, I’m looking forward to a potential deep dive whenever you have the bandwidth. Let’s grab a virtual coffee and chat.

Best regards,

Your #1 Brand Ambassador Stan