mpmpmpmp

How does it drive prices down when speculators are buying up residential houses and outbidding regular people?

What would your strategy for working with raw image data and implementing a digital “zoom” that doesn’t do any anti aliasing or smoothing? My current thought is to just have an original copy of the data and then the current canvas is just a smaller subset of the original data when zoomed. So a 100x100 pixel image when zoomed 1x would take a 50x50 subset based on the center of the viewport and copy each pixel into a 2x2 to get back to a 100x100 image.

The wikipedia page for Kalman filter says it's also known as "linear quadratic estimation" so that might be a good place to start.

That's interesting because the 3 blazor projects that I have done client work for are all WASM not server. Do you have a source for the stats on server vs wasm deployments or just what you've experienced so far?

For sure. There has been a lot of pushback in the community from both sides of that issue. They wanted to reduce the boilerplate and make it cleaner to make simpler projects (with the goal of enabling microservice scenarios). But that moved some people's cheese from the standpoint of what the recommended path is. The problem is that there's a huge amount of very good documentation on the microsoft documentation site, but it's not organized in a way that makes it easy to find.

Event sourcing

My static IP geolocates to a town 50 miles away. So unless it's some list that has good accuracy i wouldn't think so.

The AAVSO and Project Panoptes are two citizen science astronomy projects that are welcoming to all levels of experience. I think like with all hobbies you can spend a lot or a little, although for good astronomy equipment you either have to have machining/engineering skills or deep pockets for the best stuff. You can't really cheat the laws of physics when it comes to lenses, cameras, and mounts. What interests me is the science behind the data processing of photometry. That and the engineering behind building a remote observatory without spending a fortune. You definitely can find things that the pros can't because you will be able to get way more telescope time than a pro does. Things like verifying exoplanet candidates, or observing variable stars and eclipsing binaries and recording the light curves. All stuff that amateurs can contribute to.

The word luxury in this context usually implies some kind of privilege. Which is a strange thing to say.

I think the slowness of the bitrate is about making sure any errors in transmission caused my the atmosphere can be detected and accounted for.

What the author is saying is that much of what we call science are actually facts that we take on faith

This is true from a practical sense in that most people don't validate scientific assumptions that are widely accepted for themselves. But the reason why we are able to reliably take them on faith is the interesting part to me.

Peer review and the scientific method allow for incentive to "prove each other wrong" as well as to have the ability to replicate (or try to) the results for yourself. When I ask my Catholic friend why he believes the Christian God is real, and he says his evidence is that he feels the holy spirit. I have no way to disprove that and no way to replicate or prove that evidence. Therefore it's not really a reliable way to have faith in that fact.

Straight from your link.

"No data is shared unless your employees specifically request it to be shared, usually as part of an application process for loans, credit, or public aid, or in response to a permissible purpose under the Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”), such as a court order."

I got bit on my finger tip by a feral cat and had to get the first dose injection in the fingertip. It was not pleasant. The rest of them were in the butt which was not great but nothing compared to the fingertip. The cat did die and my parents were able to send it in and luckily the tests for the cat came back negative after a couple of days and I did not have to get all the doses.

I realize the satire, but honestly the best thing we ever did was have a vegetable garden. She started eating random vegetables from the garden when she went outside to play and it's been a breeze to get her to love vegetables in meals since. Really feel lucky about that one!

I think your points are still valid, but "still notice downvotes happening" doesn't make sense. You can still dislike a video on youtube. The difference is that when you go to a video with 12 million views making extraordinary claims you'll no longer see 65k downvotes and realize it's a waste of the next 12 minutes of your life and skip it.

Your last paragraph seems like the sort of discussion that should be had with a healthcare professional, not random people on the internet.

I think the point is if you're a contractor and you're not getting the same rates as an equivalent company would for that contract/position you're under-selling yourself. As for the "tax trick" you still don't get out of paying income taxes on the entire revenue you generate. You just pay employment taxes on the portion that is salary. Whether that's "fair" or not is open to debate of course.

It’s typically referred to as a wash trade or a wash sale.

Yes and it's precisely because futures and forward contracts are being used that is possible. If it wasn't then market uncertainty and fluctuations in the economy would be more instantly reflected in prices of the end user products consuming those commodities. With hedging now you can focus on margin and operations which is the whole point of your business, not predicting the global economy.

The last sentence is not true. The whole point of a futures contract is to hedge risk and allow price discovery. It is true the companies consuming commodities will buy at almost any price but more active trading results in a price more closer to fair market value over time. It’s the same reason why prices for rarely sold items fluctuate widely between sales. There’s no activity to visibly show the change in demand or supply in between.

But not all for the same reason. Part of them think FB is evil because they only care about engagement and profits regardless of the outcome to society. And the other part thinks FB is biased and is censoring conservatives and pushing too liberal of an agenda.

Everyone except for the people who are actually providing direct patient care like the nurses and the technicians.

"Well paid nurse"... Now thats a funny one.

Your comment makes it seem like it’s impossible for Amazon to determine you exceeded the threshold until after you exceeded it. Why couldn’t it work like rate limiting does but for resource consumption not just requests per X time?

It’s easy. I don’t want to live in San Francisco for 10 years to have an extra $1.24m. Most of my family would not be “just a plane flight away” where as right now I make good money and it’s a 3 hr car ride to see them. Those things mean something to me that money won’t replace. The cost of living being nice here just means I can also do all the things I want to do easier with less money.

Not speaking for them, but the thought would be the custody of the asset is never transferred to a 3rd party like it is with the typical broker/client/clearing corporation arrangement that stocks use. If the asset is traded it goes straight from counterparty to counterparty. There's no need for an escrow arrangement because the execution is out of the hands of the counterparties.

Thank you for this. It's frustrating to hear people making comments who don't have the fundamental understanding of why/how the markets work and are just upset about not being able to join in on the melee and assume it's nefarious behavior. My POV is that it was obviously a risk RH took to not make it more clear what the behavior of people's accounts would be when market volatility is high. But I worked for a Commodity Risk Management Company on their custom derivatives platform and 90% of what we did was around properly valuing customer positions so we could make sure margin requirements were met. This was a huge deal to everyone involved because the counterparty risk was so high for our company.

You can't you have to wait 2 days.

The "you can't part" here is what's not clear. My understanding of non-margin trading is that you would be able to sell for $120. What you would not be able to do is then purchase something else with that $120 until T+2 when it settles and the money is in your account again. You technically don't have that $120 until the settlement.

There is no such thing as "cash is guaranteed to come in at a future date". Counterparty risk is pretty much impossible to remove, only to trade away to another party.

"To view this, please install silverlight" Oof...