mozarella

Slopilot

I also supplement it with the "Web Archives" extension to access paywalled and login-walled articles.

He was talking about actors who contribute to the system. See my other reply : https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46202319

Because he is only talking about categories that can contribute to the system. [Scammers] do not. In so far as the system and the diagram is concerned, [scammers] are to be thwarted and their harmful effects mitigated. A lot of the work done in crypto is security which is entirely about thwarting [scammers]. As an example, The original bitcoin paper on double-spending problem is devoted to securing against a particular type of scam.

Speculators fall in a gray area and need to be dealt with on a case-by-case basis. many of them are straight up scams, Some are legit, and the rest are in between. Stratton Oakmont was a scam. Does that mean your index-fund is also one? Or the stock market and financial system as a whole?

The point i was trying to make was that the disillusionment faced by technologists possibly stemmed from a naivety about how the economy works and how people respond to incentives. Speculators are a "feature/bug" of pretty much any financial system. Stocks, real-estate, fiat-currencies, potatoes - The price of everything is being distorted by speculators. Done right, they bring liquidity, financial stability, and wealth creation. Left to their own devices, they cause volatility, inequity and financial destruction. (Crypto is probably more on the latter side on some of those metrics atm). The People looking to build a good crypto solution has to be clear-eyed about how to handle them.

I also wonder if the author has partly himself to blame. From his post, it looks like he worked for the seedier players in the space (because the pay was better) and is angry at the whole space. Its like a developer who worked for Oracle on MySql swearing off the entire open-source community.

edit: >nobody cares about good tech'

True. That's a big part of why you need [token-holders], "Build it and they will come" is more of a hope than a strategy.

https://vitalik.eth.limo/general/2024/01/31/end.html#section...

Vitalik touched upon this briefly in an other-wise long and wide-reaching essay. I think its a good treatment of the topic that the author is talking about. He categorizes the ecosystem broadly into 4 cohorts- [token holders] (which includes investors, speculators, etc.), [pragmatic users] (actual end-users who spend crypto to buy stuff), [intellectuals] (who give the vision and ideology), [builders] (of blockchains, apps, etc.) - These 4 groups come together but with different motivations and there is a gap in understanding between them. Indeed, there is even resistance against trying to reach an understanding - one which plays out in the comments section of every crypto-related post on hn. The author of this twitter-post clearly falls under [intellectual, builder] and has been disillusioned by the speculators from [token-holders]. Yet the [token-holders] are a vital component (as are the other groups) as they fund most of the development and adoption. Ultimately these 4 groups have more in common than not. The challenge going forward is to balance the occasionally conflicting needs of all the 4 groups, which includes checking the excesses of each group, while try to achieve a consensus. (Vitalik provides a nice diagram that maps out what that would look like). Crypto is an experiment in economics and economics is a science as well as a social-science. Anyone looking for a good solution must seek to understand and address the psychology of all the actors involved.

You won't lose your existing followers? They will still be able to see your new and old posts from your new host? Even if Bluesky suspends your account?

If that is true then that probably goes a long way in addressing the concern Doctrow and others have with Bluesky.

edit: According to one article[1] PDS isn't really full federation like what mastodon has. Right now you can only host your own account in your PDS (But they plan to gradually increase that limit to 10, and then more later)[2]. But it's certainly a good start. Not sure if Bluesky will have the capability to block you from reaching your own followers though (say if they ban or suspend your account).

[1] https://www.theverge.com/2024/2/6/24062837/bluesky-drops-inv...

[2] https://docs.bsky.app/blog/self-host-federation

I think the author Cory Doctrow (who is actually a published author) laid out his case quite clearly. He doesn't question the intentions or sincerity of the BlueSky team. But from past experience he is not confident that will be enough. We have all been there before. (I am old enough to remember when the likes of Google, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, etc. held themselves to similarly lofty ideals and standards.) But under pressure whether it is financial pressure or political, regulatory or or from investors, employees, the board, competition, etc. Bluesky may very well choose to renege on those promises to their users- This is enshittification. The only guarantee against this is if Bluesky allows users to seamlessly migrate their account (including posts, followers) to another host without any disruption or degradation of their service.

Can you seamlessly migrate your account (your id, followers, and posts) to another host without losing said followers? I think that's the main feature Doctrow is looking for?

Related : Corey Doctrow's article (again) about how he doesn't trust Bluesky enough to move there from mastodon. Especially Bluesky's promise to allow users to migrate to another host in the fediverse.

https://doctorow.medium.com/https-pluralistic-net-2024-11-02...

Older article : https://pluralistic.net/2023/08/06/fool-me-twice-we-dont-get...

It opens as a pinned tab but yeah maybe about 10 - 30 seconds when opening it for the first time in a new session. I am patient with it since i figure it probably takes a while to load my 5,000 or so tabs.

Not what you're are looking for but maybe Tab Session Manager might help you out : See my comment : https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41158725

Also i think they're bringing back tabgroups : https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39985626

For me, i never really liked tab groups. I prefer to organize my tabs under topical windows. Tab groups is kind of an ugly duckling in that paradigm, but thats just me.

I just organize my tab under windows and sessions :

See my comment here : https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41158725

OneTab and TabSessionManager addons fill these roles nicely on firefox.

OneTab for your readinglist/todo-list tabs TabSessionManager for your organized topical tabs

See my comment : https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41158725

I am a broken record on this. "Tab Session Manager" + "OneTab" people!!!

  - Save all your tabs and windows which come under a single topic (say "Buy car", "Learn OpenCV", "Work") as a named session using Tab Session Manager
  - You can restore, replace your saved sessions at any point in the future.  You can also edit sessions, add/delete tabs, windows from the drop-down menu.
  - It also backs up your last 10 (can be adjusted in settings) sessions.
  - Very frictionless and intuitive UX.
  - Send all the rest of your unclassified tabs (interesting hackernews articles, your readinglist) to OneTab

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/tab-session-m...

The "Tab Session Manager" add-on probably will address the majority of your gripes with firefox's inbuilt session manager :

  - It backs up your last 10 (can be changed) sessions.
  - You can save specifics sessions for perpetuity. In your example, you can save some or all of the windows under a single session named "Car". You can add/remove tabs/windows from it at any time from within the menu. And it is always there ready to be restored when you need.
  - For the rest of my unorgranised miscellaneous tabs (like random hackernews articles), i send them to OneTab rather than save them in a session.
  - Overall, very friction-less, intuitive UX.

Two (rather cumbersome) work-arounds : - Save all tabs as collection - will tell you how many tabs you have - The "Clear History" option also tells how many tabs you have currently. (Just don't accidentally click "Delete"!! )

95 windows open

You have a problem. First step is to admit it. Second step is to install firefox with OneTab and session manager addons. Third (optional) step is find some way to backup or export these to firefox so you can restore some sanity to your workflow. Save the windows that logically fit in single sessions using session manager. Send the rest (stuff like hacker news articles) to Onetab. Once you've done that, you can accept the fact that you sent most of these tabs to die and you will likely never open them again. But they are always there if you need to resurrect them ;) (Also good idea to back up your firefox profile folder(s)).

Happy Browsing.

Use tab session manager. https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/tab-session-m...

Tab Session manager addon https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/tab-session-m...

  - Its a firefox 'Recommended' addon - so its reviewed and vetted by Mozilla 
  - Great UX and features. 
  - Along with OneTab, its a lifesaving cure for tab hoarders. 
  - Autosaves your sessions. 
  - Store and recover last 10 autosaved sessions in each category (can be configured). 
  - Also manually save current session or just a window. can add, edit and delete tabs in sessions. 
  - Tag and organisze sessions. 
  - A major upgrade over the default 'Restore last session' option which on more than one occassion has lost my sessions.