monooso

AFAICT it is if you're not a trillion dollar company.

https://youtu.be/ALZZx1xmAzg?si=ugquA7uKT3ABGdws

Keep the lines fuzzy. That way we get to defend copyright but someone extraordinary also has a ray of hope of getting away with subverting it.

That's a very charitable way of saying "someone with deep enough pockets can ignore the law and get away with it."

1. Some people want that, with good reason.

2. There's incredible value in what they stole.

3. IANAL, but I don't believe "but now everyone can write like a terrible version of the writer we fleeced" is a valid legal defense.

I'm sure this will be a terribly unpopular opinion, but I've long held the view that a Chinese AI company might screw me over at some point for a complex geopolitical reason that I don't fully understand. An American AI company will screw me over tomorrow for a quick buck.

As to the argument is that (only?) the Chinese labs are training on my data, I find this almost comical given the amount of highly-personal data companies such as Meta and Google have been harvesting for decades.

You can self-host Ente.

https://ente.com/help/self-hosting/

Businesses don’t operate based on revenue. They operate based on profit.

This does not bode well for the entire AI industry.

Really excited about the upcoming Cloudflare FTP.

How many people pirating software stole every piece of copyrighted material in existence and then used that material to generate billions of dollars which they kept for themselves?

You can tell Claude Code which model to use for subagents.

For example: https://github.com/monooso/dotfiles/tree/main/.claude/agents

Several such APIs include the equivalent data for US markets in their free tier, for personal use.

I spent the entire day yesterday trying to set up some automated monitoring of my investments, only to discover most UK market information is locked behind stupid-money APIs.

Anything that improves that situation is a positive.

Regardless of whether you're correct, that wasn't the subject of the article.

The real question is, do you know what it means?

Isn't that basically the same as saying court filings should be available, but not to poor people?

I do feel like for all their dogfooding of AI coding, their own software/APIs are quite buggy...

Or possibly as a result of.

In fairness to HN, the debunking made the front page.

We're discussing home use.

You may be, but the topic of discussion is whether anyone is using a local model as their main coding tool.

Parents will get their kids phones worrying that they're missing out.

Again, not a parent, but isn't making difficult decisions in the best interests of your child the entire gig?

Disclaimer: not a parent, as will soon become apparent.

Several people have made the argument that individual parents can't simply cut their children off from social media, as said offspring may be ostracised (or simply look at their friends' phones, assuming they still have any).

That argument makes sense to me, to an extent.

What I don't quite understand is the conclusion that this leaves parents with only two (equally unpalatable) options.

Parents don't have to act individually. They could act as a collective, especially within the context of a small social group.

Is that really such a naive suggestion?

TIL, thank you.

I apologise if using words correctly is obvious and lame.

GP is explicitly criticising the language in the lede as being unsuitably vague, hence my reply.

As to the goal of the article, I fail to see what is dishonourable about comparing LLMs. You may consider the methodology flawed, but it's a perfectly respectable goal.

Sorry, was that another technicality? I'll try to find better material, just for you.

Anthropic clamping down on non-first party clients using their subscription plans may also have something to do with it.

Thankfully, it has been many years since I had to debug Bluetooth drivers (or anything of that ilk) on Linux.

I think you've misunderstood the purpose of a lead (sic).

Per Merriam-Webster [^1], a lede is:

the introductory section of a news story that is intended to entice the reader to read the full story

(Emphasis mine)

You may prefer more matter-of-fact phrasing, of course, but criticising a lede for attempting to achieve its goal is unjustified.

[^1]: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/lede

In what way?

I don't think it's reasonable to judge Conventional Commits on something it doesn't claim to do.

I can't see any suggestion on the CC site [^1] that it "solve[s] the core issue of the poor commit messages problem."

Rather, it's explicitly described as "a specification for adding human and machine readable meaning to commit messages."

I'd say it accomplishes that modest goal.

[^1]: https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/

He explicitly addresses that in the article.

Luckily I’ve been joined by some other very good developers with great systems development skills and security knowledge... Watch out for some credits for some great new rsync developers in the next release.

I've found Cosmic to be rather flaky, sadly (I'm rooting for it to succeed), so the latency issues may not have been Wayland-related.

Both KDE and GNOME seem to run very smoothly on Wayland.

I've found the built-in clipboard manager on KDE Plasma 6 to be very reliable.

When I used GNOME, the Clipboard Indicator extension [1] served me well.

[1] https://extensions.gnome.org/extension/779/clipboard-indicat...

Now we just take loans to purchase the train tickets.