moktonar

The problem is that the more AI eats labor, the more you can hike the costs until you pretty much can match the salary of the workers you replaced, with some margin, enough for the user to accept the cost. That’s what will happen in the next decade IMHO. price = base expense + what user accepts to pay

Did the Feds desperately need a way of getting the key? is this a bugdoor? Has the commits been traced? Recently I’ve been seeing this pattern a lot and I’m starting to be a little bit suspicious. Maybe it’s because people are more sensible to this and post more on it?

And so it begun..

Jokes aside does anybody else notice the eerie similarities with gray aliens?

I think we should start having ai versions like beta ora alpha versions and then consolidate them into human made versions with time, at least one is free to stay safe or on the bleeding edge as one likes and we all get a win-win best-of-all-worlds situation (hopefully)

Inexistent security, absent security contacts/hard to get in touch with, denial/delay/won’t patch, most functionality to deploy a backdoor is already present, to me equals bugdoor. This is wanted behavior, not an accident, and is a widespread pattern..

int x[n] and int *x are very different things when it comes to defining memory layout tho. In one case you end up with n int sized slots of memory, in the second with one register sized slot. That makes all the difference when defining structs for example.

I get what he’s saying, but, doesn’t he compare classical speed up of parallelizing 64 bit key space on 2^16 cpus with parallelizing 128 bits key space on QCs? It’s true that sqrt (2^128/2^16) = 2^56 and that 56 >> 48, but in one case you are attacking a 64 bits key space and in the other a 128! If you parallelize 2^128 on 2^16 CPUs you get 128-16=112 bits of key space per cpu which is much bigger than 56! No?

Edit: I mean, I get the point is to prove that 2^128 on QC is not the same as 2^64 on CC but it’s still a lot less to search. If a paper came out with that big of a key space reduction AES would be considered broken IMO

Except maybe storing another smaller vector for the difference with the original data an also quantize that maybe recursively

Aren’t polar coordinates still n-1 + 1 for radius for n-dim vector? If so I understand that angles can be quantized better but when radius r is big the error is large for highly quantized angles right? What am I missing?

Is it possible to do the inverse, then? (Tranforming weights back to code)

Thank you for all the work guys, I’ll see how I can help.

Well fucking done. Anthropic has just gained the “has bollocks” status. Also now we know what the govt is really up to with AI. G fucking g

The random uuid selection is far superior because of lifespan, you can only have so many functioning devices at the same time, and on the contrary to tree-based uuids once a device is decommissioned the uuid can be reclaimed. Practically though it would probably be a mixed algorithm where positioning would give the id root and the rest is selected randomly

UB is the definition of Free Will that’s why you can’t control it, and for a programmer something that cannot be controlled is felt as dangerous..

Bugdoors, bugdoors everywhere..

The fact that they refuse to fix is the sketchiest part, and also they should be held accountable for things like this IMO

I can already envision a “I’m not human” captcha, for sites like this. Who will be the first to implement it? (Looks at Cloudflare)

I agree but if you can infer that maybe there are children running around because it’s the time they get out of school etc, then yes, you stop at every double parked car.. I’m not saying it’s easy to do, I’m just saying that’s a limitation of the system, that still already does miracles..

You are predicting stuff that your sensors don’t see all the time my friend

detects foot movement ..

That’s probably how they do it, which is again very clever stuff, chapeau. But they do it like that b/c they can’t really predict the world around them fast enough. It might be possible in the future with AI World Models though

The Waymo driver tech is impressive. That said an experienced driver might have recognized the pattern where a stopped big vehicle occludes a part of the road leading to such situation, and might have stopped or slowed down almost to a halt before passing. The Waymo driver reacts faster but is not able to predict such scenarios by filling the gaps, simulating the world to inform decisions. Chapeau to Waymo anyways

We should definitely send a playable copy of doom to aliens on a golden record on the next Voyager mission

But isn’t Greenland already in NATO?

It’s easier for a state to enforce censorship when there is only a SPoF

The real question tho is: how would you become the mitm reserving for yourself the benefit of the doubt?

I read somewhere that electrolysis of marine water could emit enough oxygen, while also harvesting hydrogen, to counter CO2 emissions, but I can’t find the source, has anyone heard of it before or am I filling the gaps of my memory with generated garbage?

It’s like comparing apples and oranges

Once you have the efficient algorithm you approximate asymptotically with the energy you have, of course you can’t obtain the same precision

What’s the difference? Arguably the latter will be better IMO than the former

At least the solar system I would say. Quantum mechanics will help you do that in the correct way to obtain what Nature already obtained: general intelligence.

By simulating it