moeris

Automated deployments would have allowed you to review the deployment before it happened. A failed deployment could be configured to allow automatic rollbacks. Automated deployments should also handle experiment flags, which could have been toggled to reduce impact. There are a bunch of places where it could have intervened and mitigated/prevented this whole situation.

Well, if someone goes to prison for a relatively harmless drug, they're more likely to turn to hard drugs.

For hard drugs it can probably help centers do things like safe injection sites. Legalization also means you can regulate. That can help in a lot of ways: making drugs safer, mandating that done portion of proceeds gives towards prevention, etc. Addicts will be less afraid of seeking medical treatment if they know they won't be in legal trouble. (They wouldn't anyway, but I've heard a lot of people are paranoid about this.)

Anyway, I don't have any facts or figures. But it seems reasonable to me that legalization could, in some cases, help.

Imagine not being yelled at or ridiculed or told to figure it out if what you're asked to do is ambiguous or makes no sense.

I think maybe you just worked at a terrible business. You experience contacting sounds more like my experience at my current job.

This is just bad journalism.

It's possible you just have poor taste. Personally, I think the reasons for the repair cost aren't relevant, same is pretty obvious. It's an unconventional car that had limited production. I'm sure they're adding in the cost of parts (they'll likely have to buy another insurance of this car to rip the parts out of, or they'll have to fabricate it themselves. Which could require hiring an engineer to make sure they don't get sued if the car bursts into flames) and labor that comes with learning how to repair a complete unknown for them, plus a good helping of uncertainty.

The most relevant part of this story is that there's a guy who bought into a new tech, and who is being unreasonable when it didn't work for as long as he had hoped. And that comes through fine in the article.

While most Lyme disease patients who are diagnosed and treated early can fully recover, 10 to 20 percent suffer from persistent symptoms, some seriously disabling.

There's no evidence that chronic Lyme exists:

There is no evidence to suggest that “chronic Lyme” exists, or that long-term antibiotics are required to treat it.

(https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/avoid-prolonged-antibiotics...)

It's pseudoscientific and pretty dangerous nonsense at that.

One advantage here is for well-lit areas, like if you have a window seat. More light makes the kaleido display sharper, rather than making it frustrating. It can change how you lay out your office, and make things like adjusting blinds less necessary.

Just to add to other things people have mentioned, reports of ghosts could very easily be the result of false memories, as well. Finding a dead body in a creepy location, then sitting on it for two years is plenty of time and fuel for false memories. (Which are notoriously easy to form.)

Another thing I think is the most likely is [pareidolia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pareidolia). Our minds evolved to be sensitive to seeing faces/hearing voices, and so we tend to see these things where they don't actually exist. (Think faces in toast, or listening for satanic messages when playing music backwards.)

It seems like "artifact provenance" or something would have been a better term. Is this related to SLSA?

Users of kakoune, like myself. What I don't understand is why this is seem as such a big deal. You spend most of your workday in your editor of choice. It's not that big a deal to spend a day or two getting used to the (IMO better) keybindings. I still up using vim for some things, like vimdiff, and I don't find it difficult to move between the two. Then again, I also use Dvorak, so maybe I'm just used to changing between layouts.

Why wouldn't they be able to? A milk is just a consumable suspension. Look to milk of magnesia, milk of the poppy, etc. It has a long history of being used in a general sense.

Well, it's good I didn't imply that, then. People can miss things in articles, ignore them, or just not understand. All are valid reasons for missing/ignoring that part. My point is that the article doesn't mention it was easier to breastfeed back in the day, despite that being a kind of obvious point to make. So it's possible that they couldn't make the point because we don't know if breastfeeding was difficult back then.

Most of the comments here are implying that there is some environmental change which has caused breastfeeding to become harder or less efficient. The article doesn't seem to say that, though. I didn't see any implication that breastfeeding was better back in prehistory.

It's possible that it's always been hard. Being in a social group large enough that there are other mothers would solve the issue, largely.

I never get all the Apple fanboy love for their trackpads. They're okay, but ultimately they are still trackpads. They still erroneously track input when you brush against them the wrong way. I prefer the Thinkpad trackpoint by far. (And an actual mouse is even better.)

At least part of it is trying to save people work, I imagine. "That's a cool tool, but there's an existing, well-supported one that already solves those problem."

Of course, the problem here is that Nix may be similar to this language, but they solve different problems. So I imagine the writer is just mistaken, and it comes off as one-upsmanship.

Not when it's referentially transparent. In that case, there's no need to run the tests if a function or its children haven't changed. Of course, in that's the case, the tests are probably fast enough that running then won't matter much.

Many of us pay for government services we will never use, though. As a man, for example, I'll never be a recipient of WIC. By your logic, I should never have to pay for these benefits. However, that seems wrong. Even if I never use WIC, Social security, government housing, addiction recovery programs, etc. I should still pay for them because it's good for society as a whole.

Plus, there's the fact that even if you're not living in the US doesn't mean you're not benefiting from citizenship. You still enjoy the privilege of American consulates, being able to travel to certain countries, and certain limited protections and privileges. So it's not like it's _nothing_.

knowing is harder to get adequate nutrition

It's really not, though. Not any harder than in a meat eating diet. Maybe if you're following a vegan diet. Or if you have specific health concerns (like low iron absorption). But then, you should probably have to be careful if you're eating meat, as well.

Mastodon is written in Rails, I think. What makes you say that it will be an instance written in Django?

intelligence is needed for safe driving... won't get when something unexpected arises as it always will in time

I don't think that's true. While unexpected situations do arise, I don't think people use much "intelligence" to handle them. When an elephant falls out of the semi truck in front of you, your response is to hit the breaks. You don't spend a minute thinking about the likelihood of the event, or question whether allowing the elephant to hit your car might improve the likelihood of it surviving (and whether that justifies sacrificing yourself.)

The fact is that most accidents aren't very atypical. They're everyday things that happen, and people aren't paying attention, or they make a mistake. Handling just these scenarios will result in net saved lives. In other words, autonomous driving doesn't have to be perfect to be useful.

If we're going to start slinging blame, let's start where it's most appropriate: these farms should never have existed in the first place. Other countries have banned them, and the US should as well.

Most of the time that will likely be fruitless. Companies don't comment on why they made their employment decisions because it opens them up to be sued, with no benefit to them. (At my current company, they warn us not to tell interviewees how they performed.)

Because they accepted terms of service that explicitly stated what information can be collected.

"it works for me" gives very little information about the software you're using.

I don't think so. It says that the software satisfies the basic requirements of its target audience, and gives a hint as to who that audience is.

On the other hand, if you receive the opinion of some self-proclaimed expert, I think you're receiving less useful information. Experts are typically a small percentage of the userbase, and among experts there can be vastly different opinions depending on their specialty. Ask an Android dev to review vim, and an operating systems dev, and you'll get wildly different responses. If you ask a generalist software developer, you'll likely get less noise.

No Pebble user ever consented to their health data being sold to Google, but all of this is legal.

You're saying that Pebble users didn't sign a contract detailing use of data? That seems highly irregular.

I think the text editor, [Kakoune](https://github.com/mawww/kakoune), was written as an experiment in modern C++ language features. Its documentation says it requires a C++20 compiler, though I don't imagine it was originally for that version, since it was started before 2020.

three-button-mouse heavy sam/acme

Acme is great. I haven't been able to find another editor that integrates as tightly with the operating system. The closest I've gotten is Kakoune. And I wish mouse chording were a thing more generally. If we're going to use mice, we should optimize their utility.

It's way more dangerous than non-flammable inert gas.

I dunno, some inert gases can be dangerous. You don't want to inhale an inert gas that's heavier than air.

the vast majority is surprisingly dull and average

A rose is still beautiful even though it's common. I think the problem is that people are often scared to open up about the more vulnerable parts of their lives. "Dull" people can have very interesting or poignant pasts, but can be unable or unwilling to share it.

the next institution looking to hire someone is going to ask about why that person left their last job

Indeed, schools aren't as isolated as businesses are, either. If you go rogue and make a huge stink at one school, you can bet no nearby district will hire you. On the other hand, if you play ball and do a decent job, other districts will look out for you when an opening happens. It happened to me, right before I left teaching.

Another thing to consider is that outside of large cities, you're geographically constrained. If you own a house and mess things up with your school, you're looking at having to add 30+ minutes to your commute to get to the next school. (Who will probably have heard of your escapades.)

Seniority is another factor to consider. It's very difficult for teachers in their first five years to get a job. (On average, it takes five years for teachers to become proficient in classroom management, so schools tend to prefer more experienced teachers). Anyway, that means there's a huge block of teachers who will have a difficult time despite shortages. Like in tech, it's primarily a shortage of qualified teachers. At least, when I was teaching ~5 years ago.

2. Well, they are. A teaching certification used to only require two years of higher learning compared to typical 4 for other things. That said, most teachers are actually more highly educated than the average person because schools use educational attainment as direct basis for pay.

Incorrect: it depends on the state, the subject, and the grade level. For secondary education of a core subject, in Michigan, for example, I had to take all of the classes for a normal 4-year degree in the subject, plus taking the equivalent of two years of education classes. Taking 18-20 credit hours per semester, it took me five years to graduate. So the requirements can actually be much more difficult than a normal degree.

When I taught Title I, there was an additional requirement that you had to be "highly qualified". That typically meant a 4-year degree out equivalent experience, no matter the subject or grade level.

Many teachers have a master's not due to pay, as you claim, but because states essentially mandate it. In Michigan you're required to get continuing education credits. I believe the requirement drops off once you have a master's. So it doesn't make a lot of sense not to get one.