HN user

minusLik

189 karma
Posts0
Comments25
View on HN
No posts found.

Despite not quite being an artist, this resonated with me. This fits well in line with my favourite example of corpo-speak: "challenge" instead of "problem". Lately, I find myself replacing these two in my mind occasionally when reading them and the texts still don't change their meaning.

It's a bit depressing watching language get shallow …

I fed the technical data of my motorcycle into the model and it told me right away that this build would destroy a real engine because the piston speed would be too great.

The real thing has been running for 56,000 miles, so it can't be that bad. *g

For me, it's the European Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation (PPWR). It is intended to reduce/recycle waste from shipping packages.

The eyebrow-raising part is that each country has a registry at which every company that intends to ship goods (independent of size) must sign up. Plus, it has to look for a recycling company. Each year, the company has to give an estimate on what amount of packages it is going to use and pay the recycling cost for it beforehand. Both companies are then required to report that amount to the registry. At the end of the year, they report again, this time the actual amount of packaging used (you get the part of the fee back if you overpaid).

If you ship to other EU countries, you are required to register in similar registries in every single one of them. Plus, they have their own requirements to your packages and Austria, for example, wants you to appoint a representative who does the paperwork for you and takes liability (the EU is working on making the representative mandatory in general).

Needless to say that all this stuff does not come for free. The fees for postage, the registry, the adaptions to foreign regulations and all costs associated with it easily get over a thousand Euros. No problem for the big merchants, but I think you all can guess how well this pays off if you only have a handful of shipments from, say, Germany to Austria.

And that's why shops only ship to selected countries despite the EU having free movement of goods.

PS: Merchants from outside EU (e. g. Temu) don't have to do any of this.

The account is not directly required, but you have a very hard time using an Android smartphone without a Google account. It's a bit easier with Apple, however both have in common that the apps required for eIDAS are available in their app stores – and they are not usable without an account (for common users).

It's an account requirement in a roundabout way.

Fairphone actually does this. My FP3+ displays a red bar with an open padlock as long as the bootloader is unlocked, and when one changes the bootloader lock one way or the other, the phone wipes itself.

Thank you for the article! I found the "I understand computers and therefore the world" in the beginning a bit pretentious, but after reading the rest anyway, it doesn't anymore. I'd summarize the piece as:

"The hacker mindset comes with powerful tools: The urge to figure stuff out, the creativity to use it in unusual ways and the passion to share knowledge. Let's use it to make the world a better place. Start a company and gather allies. If enough of us do this, we'll have an impact on the world."

You can't solve political problems with technical solutions.

Yes, that's what I've been thinking too. Tom Quiter even mentions in the interview that there already have been companies which tried to offer cheap wheelchairs, but the quasi-monopolists had the FDA alter the regulations in a way with which the newbies couldn't comply.

However, since the MIF already attracted suppliers, I hope they can gain some leverage.

What the article does not seem to mention is that an usual electric wheelchair costs about $65,000 (and is intended to be replaced every six years or so). This and the non-availability of replacement parts is why some wheelchair users started a project to open-source a wheelchair from standard parts:

https://themif.org/

Louis Rossmann interviewed the founder of the project here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eaAj59025Kk

“Why”? What kind of question is “why”?

Because low-level applications like this were promised when UEFI was introduced, that's why. UEFI's creators went even as far as to dream of replacing the Linux-based Internet-only mini-OSes of some vendors which could be accessed by pressing a certain key during boot (though I don't remember what they were called).