HN user

mindvirus

2,047 karma
Posts2
Comments350
View on HN

Throwing out one idea: for the 30+ crowd with kids and families, how can you make it frictionless to maintain and build friendships, especially across different groups (building, schools, after schools, family)? Not necessarily as families, but just flagging events and making organizing events easier - my friends and I dont see each other nearly enough since we had kids. Everyone seems to be using WhatsApp for it and it's not great.

Amazing, I feel like I'm zooming in to some alien city.

I'm sure people are thinking about it, but with high resolution scanning, 3D printing, etc., it feels like it should be possible to create extremely high quality reproductions of famous artwork at scale, and at a fairly reasonable cost.

Is anyone working on this?

I think it's more about when the market is still majority manual. 20% self driving might see premiums for manual cars go up significantly because manual drivers would have more at fault accidents per mile than before (assuming the same rate of accidents, but most accidents with a self driving car are the manual driver's fault).

There will also be things like not having DWIs and even cheap parking (since the car can drive away and park) that'll net out for self driving. And feedback loops there- the same size police force only pulling over manual cars from a smaller and smaller pool.

I think insurance prices will drive adoption of self driving very quickly.

Consider: if a non-self driving car is in an accident with a self driving car, it'll almost always be the non-self driving car at fault. And with the telemetry from the self-driving car, they can prove it too, so accidents that would have been no-fault or shared fault become fully the non-self driving cars fault. And so I think insurance for non-self driving cars gets expensive fast as there are more and more self driving cars on the road.

It is cynical, but quality over quantity is bad advice if you want to grow your career as a manager. It's a real failure mode. Not being aggressive about growing your headcount will hold you back. Pretty much all managers are evaluated on amount of headcount when it comes to promotions, especially if you're not tied to P&L.

Presumably I'd be able to buy it back at $0.60 on the dollar since that's what the market value of a low interest mortgage would be on today's market of 7% mortgage rates.

I'd want to do it so I could sell my place and move. No doubt if I sell my place now, the bank is just taking that money and lending it out again, making a profit on the difference in rates.

This is a fascinating article, though I'm not sure I grok the analogy about flow meters.

Given they're so securitized, I wish I could buy back my own mortgage at a discount given how much interest rates have risen. It feels that given the notes about conforming mortgages being fungible, that product/service should exist.

That's a fun prompt. Depends on the landlord but taking a Chris Voss approach here:

"Honestly, I'm worried I can't afford to move, you're a smart guy, I bet you're worried about that too. I get it, I don't want to be 'that' tenant." (label the negative emotion, empathize)

"How am I supposed to move so soon? It'd cost me $1500 and I can barely even afford the rent." (Anchor a price, turn it into problem solving)

"This is probably going to sound unreasonable, but could you help me with the move? That way I can be sure to be out on time." (Calibrated question to guide the conversation)

One big viewpoint shift I've had over the past 5 years is that it should be very hard to fire people for their actions outside of work. By and large things that aren't criminal, don't involve employees of the company or their customers, and are not done under the guise of being an employee of the company should be that person's business alone. I get that there are a lot of grey areas, but it feels to me we've gone way too far the other way.

I meant what the people are optimizing for. However, even equity has its faults: equity has to vest for it to be worth anything (and later, be exercised for strike + AMT). The expected value of impact could be high, but if they have a higher chance of getting fired and losing their unvested equity, they might not. Many people are risk adverse - for example, would you pay $100k for a 25% chance to win $1 million? Entrepreneurs might say heck yeah, but most employees wouldn't.

I think incentives are part of the solution, but culture is the other part. The organizations views toward risks and failure are going to shape how people place their bets in their career.

You have to know what you and others are optimizing for.

In big companies, it's rarely the success of the project. Usually it's a combination of keeping your job and growing your career.

Most big companies provide limited upside for success, and the downside risk is higher for the people. Consider:

1. The project is successful. You get a nice little bonus at the end, if anything. Maybe a promotion a year later.

2. The project is a failure and people can point part that you were responsible for. You get nothing, or worse, you're fired.

3. The project is a failure, but people can't point at you as the reponsible party. You keep your job, even get a small raise because you did your part.

Part of this is inevitable in my opinion, but organizations should really ask themselves what behavior they're incentivizing and rewarding, especially in a repeated fashion. If your people swing for the fences and miss -- what happens, and how does that compare to the people who bunt or stay on the bench?

Tao Te Ching 3 years ago

Totally agree. Speaking from the western perspective, it's short and poetic, and it introduces concepts that people aren't familiar with in a brief and accessible way. I don't think anyone in the west is becoming a Taoist in any meaningful sense because of it.

Tao Te Ching 3 years ago

The Tao that can be named is not the true Tao. :)

It's a very accessible exploration of attachment and offers some great insights on things like ego, virtue and leadership.

I've talked about this before, but the US debt feels to me mostly like an accounting mechanism.

What I mean is that the US government is mostly in debt to itself, in money it can print. For example, the Social Security Trust Fund buys US bonds to secure its cashflows.

Anyway, I really don't understand if and why the US National Debt matters that much (I'm not saying it doesn't, I just don't get it)

Broken Ownership 3 years ago

This is a great writeup, I think I've found myself in every one of those segments.

One piece that feels like it could use more exploration is the ability to mandate. Some of it is leading through influence, but a place I've struggled is when stakeholders have a different mandate than my own.