HN user

michaelaiello

354 karma

Current: CTO @ secureworks.com

Ongoing Non-Profit Projects http://www.hackedip.org http://privacyparrot.com

Business & Security Wins: https://cloud.google.com/security http://www.humansecurity.com http://www.appgate.com http://lifeensured.com (acquired by http://securesafe.com) http://www.difrwear.com (RFID Blocking Wallets)

Posts6
Comments86
View on HN

WhiteOps | Product Managers / Threat Intelligence / Threat Research | On Site NYC and remote (US, UK, EU) | Full-time | https://www.whiteops.com/

Product Managers with Digital Advertising Ecosystem, CyberSecurity / Cloud Security Product Experience. Threat Intelligence, Threat Research folks.

What do we do? Building the world's best human verification platform. Disrupting the profit centers of cybercrime. Solving enduringly difficult cybersecurity problems.

Funding? Recently completed a large funding round and are growing rapidly. https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:6747567...

Email me (Product Hiring Manager) directly. No recruiters please. michael dot aiello at whiteops dot com

They key metric here is how much it costs ($/TON of CO2 Captured and Sequestered). There are a range of methods and approaches to do this. The average cost for Air Capture across modern approaches is $250/Ton of C02 Captured and Sequestered.

There are other approaches besides Atmospheric Capture and Sequestration which hold more promise 1. High concentration C02 Emission Capture at source 2. Ocean surface capture and de-acidification

Wrote a quick article describing all of them linking to specific research papers and their results here https://www.projectcelsius.com/2017/05/29/capture-methods/

I expect this will follow a similar journey to how solar panel adoption went... once things tipped over the critical ($/KWH) where it made sense over grid electrical, people started to adopt. I imagine once one of the techniques reaches a critical $/TON Captured & Sequestered, governments or institutions will pay to build whatever machines to start. Right now things are too expensive using any method (i.e. using the best method, it would cost ~$12 Trillion dollars to capture and sequester ~49 Gigatons - the estimated carbon emitted in 1 year by humans in 2020)

Let's look at this from the user perspective.

Grocery store 1: No credit option, must have a positive balance on my EBT card.

Grocery store 2 (P&L Deli Grocery) flexible credit option, able to take a loan out while waiting for EBT card to get replenished.

As a customer, which one of these two offerings is better?

#2 is clearly a better grocery store. It is a grocery + lender for those on EBT cards!

The EBT system (and, likely every other credit card / merchant processor) bans informal credit because there is no basis of control or audit-ability on these kinds of transactions.