HN user

mhb

42,088 karma

www.bermita.com mitch@bermita.com

Posts3,314
Comments4,259
View on HN
www.cringely.com 5d ago

The Auditor's Opinion

mhb
1pts0
makezine.com 8d ago

Build Your Own Computed Axial Lithography 3D Printer

mhb
3pts0
en.wikipedia.org 10d ago

Braess's paradox: Adding roads to a road network can slow overall traffic flow

mhb
12pts3
link.springer.com 13d ago

Animal model of xray reading: Detection of lung abnormalities in CT by pigeons

mhb
4pts1
www.youtube.com 14d ago

QuadRF – Modular 4x4 MIMO beamforming tile. SDR in the spatial domain.

mhb
1pts0
www.youtube.com 19d ago

Atomic Force Microscope video, steel etching, bacteria – Applied Science

mhb
3pts0
www.youtube.com 20d ago

Atomic Force Microscope [video]

mhb
122pts18
www.thefp.com 1mo ago

Give the Baby Peanut Butter

mhb
4pts0
www.darpa.mil 1mo ago

Lift Challenge

mhb
42pts48
www.youtube.com 1mo ago

How to Demolish a Bridge [video]

mhb
1pts0
www.techeblog.com 1mo ago

Telescope Rancher Who Manages Telescopes Each Night on a Texas Ranch

mhb
4pts0
www.nytimes.com 1mo ago

Early Research Suggests a Path to Predict and Prevent Lung Cancer

mhb
3pts0
www.nytimes.com 1mo ago

Nearly Everyone, Everywhere, Veers Left When Walking

mhb
33pts7
randsinrepose.com 1mo ago

The Apple Charging Situation

mhb
2pts0
twitter.com 1mo ago

Fable 5 creates full Swiss lever watch movement in Three.js

mhb
4pts0
www.nature.com 1mo ago

World-first: therapy to make cells young again trialled in a person

mhb
4pts0
www.thefp.com 1mo ago

The Machines Making People Human Again

mhb
4pts0
www.thedictionaryofobscuresorrows.com 1mo ago

The Dictionary of Obscure Sorrows

mhb
20pts5
www.joanwestenberg.com 1mo ago

The Costco Theory of the Internet

mhb
3pts0
www.lesswrong.com 1mo ago

Running an Air Purifier on Batteries

mhb
2pts0
www.popsci.com 1mo ago

This creepy blob robot will keep going even if you break its legs

mhb
2pts1
www.tohoku.ac.jp 1mo ago

A Fundamental Principle of Aeronautical Engineering Has Been Overturned

mhb
31pts20
www.npr.org 1mo ago

As floods get worse, Britain tries a new solution: beavers

mhb
16pts5
www.cringely.com 1mo ago

The Permission Slip – Robert X. Cringely

mhb
3pts0
wildhornets.com 2mo ago

Ukrainian FPV Interceptor Sting by Wild Hornets

mhb
23pts7
www.mayoclinicproceedings.org 2mo ago

Never-Words: What Not to Say to Patients with Serious Illness

mhb
3pts0
richarddawkins.substack.com 2mo ago

Are you conscious? A conversation between Dawkins and ChatGPT

mhb
5pts1
conversationswithtyler.com 2mo ago

Craig Newmark on Institutional Maintenance, Giving Away Control, the Internet

mhb
2pts0
www.thistothat.com 2mo ago

This To That: Because people have a need to glue things to other things

mhb
5pts0
www.youtube.com 2mo ago

This Robot Can Beat You at Table Tennis [video]

mhb
1pts0

Why do you think other people want to hear you practicing songs that you're not good at? I'm imagining someone trying to learn the recorder by the campfire.

Also:

  Last fall, for example, nearly 12 percent of first-year U.C.S.D. undergraduates were not qualified to take pre-calculus, a low-level class, up from only 0.5 percent in 2020. “The key problem is that many of the students coming in do not know algebra,” said Mina Aganagic, a Berkeley physics professor. More than half of entering Berkeley students who took a math placement test incorrectly answered basic questions (such as solving for x in x²> 4).

I don't really understand this. How much better are things for killing a specific plant than whatever you would use to kill a superset of the plants that might be there? Or treating with a few different plant species killers. And wouldn't those options cost less than the cost of this service?

Sounds similar to the aspiration of randomly picking an out-of-the way restaurant in hopes that you are going to discover a great little hole-in-the-wall. Needless to say, I suspect any lack of regret in either case might be attributable to cognitive biases.

Half-Baked Product 19 days ago

I've dreamed of a dishwasher for people who prioritize clean dishes quickly and quietly over the incremental savings from using asymptotically less water or energy. See also low flush toilets and clothes washing machines.

You're the one who started talking about specific examples and I agree that that's irrelevant since different companies decide how to allocate the money they save by reducing labor costs. Which is actually a refutation of your general assertion that labor cost savings don't constrain prices.

Your argument is based on the conspiratorial belief that "corporations" are a monolith conspiring to allocate the savings from self checkout. You have not explained why each of them is not incentivized to use that savings to reduce costs to take more business from their competitors. Is your answer that the businesses are all colluding? You have also not explained why they are constrained at all in the amount they can raise prices. The drip theory makes no sense. This is all basic economics.

So pointing out business models that don’t raise prices while not customer service, to counter the claim of “hiring more people will raise the prices for us”, is a problem how?

It's a problem because the business models are providing alternatives of what their customers value. You're arguing that because Costco, one of, if not the most successful retailers in the world, can do it why can't all stores? I can assure you every business wants to be Costco.

But also, I've been to Costco. And they offer what they want in quantities that they want. And it's often not what I want no matter how well they treat their employees. Also the checkout lines were very long.

Business 101? Take a step back. What you're describing is the feedback mechanism of the competition that drives prices down. Supply, demand, price. Econ 101. The reason prices aren't infinite is not because the evil corporations are conspiring to increase them slowly enough that customers barely notice. It's because, if they increase them too much, they will lose business to their competitors.

Apple has the ability to raise prices because customers value its ecosystem. But, OK. Why didn't they raise the price by thousands? Do you think people didn't notice the few hundred dollar price increase drip? It looks to me like people did notice. It's because at a certain price, it's worthwhile to hold your nose and use a different operating system.

Yes. If you create a straw man, you're very convincing. The real world isn't a static snapshot though. If people are unhappy enough with existing businesses, they will find alternatives or new businesses will see opportunities. Or you can move to a place with the type of businesses you prefer.

In-n-out, Costco, Walmart

Congratulations. You've identified different business models.

I still remember when all the fast food chains raised their prices together

If this is true, what force are you imagining constrains all the fast food chains from not having n times their current prices? Adjust n to whatever value is lower than your hyperbole trigger.

Yeah sure. That's the logic that elects Mamdani. Maybe you're confused because instead of going down, prices increased less than they otherwise would have.

Economics happens on the margins where the reality is that store A reduces its costs and lowers its prices to compete with Store B. Or are you paying $100 for a jar of peanut butter?

It’s a form of free labor that somehow society is okay with.

It's very popular to say this in some places, but wouldn't you expect that the money that businesses are saving when they do this is passed along to the customer in lower prices? Since they're competing with other businesses?