HN user

mgummelt

679 karma

Founder at Plato - mgummelt@plato.io

Posts7
Comments253
View on HN

You can't compare the accuracy of speech recognition to LLM task completion rates. A nearly-there yet incomplete solution to a Github issue is still valuable to an engineer who knows how to debug it.

One factor that no one seems to have noticed is that both cofounders, Ravi and Joshua, have already built fairly big companies. Ravi was the co-founder at Heap (he took over my co-founder spot after I left), and Joshua was the CTO at Benchling.

Both of those companies have raised >$100M. After that success, the prospect of continuing to run a middling company in the shadow of Retool isn't very appealing.

There are lots of examples in the use cases section of any low-code vendor, but in short, most internal tools are not in the horizontal categories you listed. They're in vertical, industry-specific categories at SES (Software-Enabled Services) companies.

A quick commerce startup, for instance, is unlikely to find an inventory tracking app off-the-shelf that fits their workflow, since existing ERPs are not going to fit their workflow.

Founder of https://plato.io here.

We support concurrent editing, so you see updates from your teammates in realtime, but we just haven't built a frontend for it yet, so you don't get the visual indicators a la Figma of where your teammates are and what they're doing.

Email me if you want to chat more: mgummelt@plato.io

Mostly, yea. It's generated from the sequence of actions the user takes in the UI, with a little bit of inference so we can detect, for example, that a user actually is trying to update the first row in a filtered table, rather than a specific row with a specific ID.

And they can be triggered in lots of different ways (buttons, forms, events), not just keyboard shortcuts.

We've run some experiments, and the answer is "sort of...sometimes...for some things".

One of our customers, for instance, records macros that upload new users from their Plato tables into their Hubspot CRM, and doing that field mapping is a lot easier in a formal system like a macro than in English.

It seems use cases that can tolerate more ambiguity are more amenable to LLMs, since that's what English is best at.

Yep, lots of users need on-prem/VPC deployment. It's next on the list. If you subscribe to our email list, you'll be the first to know when it's ready. In the meantime, we can set up an SSH tunnel for you if you email us.

I think low-code and really SaaS itself has made "Shadow IT" here to stay. Gone are the days of centralized IT. The sprawl and integration of disparate computing systems is the new normal.

But many of the engineers we talk with want to provide a self-serve environment for tooling, because it takes a lot of work off their plate that they can redirect to creating products and infrastructure. Data teams provide self-serve sandboxes to their teammates for analytics. We think engineers will come to see the importance of providing tooling sandboxes as well.

Yep, it's a one-to-many autogenerated backlink, helpful for seeing every e.g. purchase for a user.

The lack of backlinks is one of the big frustrations I've had in other DB apps, since "this thing has many of these" is such a common pattern.