HN user

mg1982

148 karma
Posts1
Comments40
View on HN

He says Google got 100x their investment since it's 'worth' that multiple of what they paid. I don't think it's a valid argument since they paid real cash and have only a notional value in return. It's hard to see anyone forking over $100bn+ for youtube, and I doubt it's even made enough profit since they bought it to cover what they paid originally paid. None of this is to particularly criticise either the original post or its followup - it takes courage to call it as you see it and then own up to your mistakes, but it's always worth taking another pass at the figures to see if they really stack up.

Thread: New Mexico outlaws civil asset forfeiture

Comment: "Oliver is a nice white man, so he'll never rape anyone, but that nigger definitely drugged and raped those women"

Me: Wow - that degenerated quickly. Also, if I saw that quote in isolation it would take me about a million years to guess the thread it came from.

Worth a watch. It is painful and seemingly stupid at times but it's worth trying to see it from the perspective of someone who, thus far, hasn't noticed or cared about any of it. I can't quite do it, but the underlying intelligence of Oliver's argument and performance illuminates the lack of traction he's had at the societal level and hints at a possible way forward. Kudos, I suppose...

Long, but worth a read even if you're not in the field. It helped bring into focus a lot of the things that didn't feel right about startup culture (if it can be called that), but that I couldn't quite put my finger on.

It's a real shame, but I don't think Mozilla is going to be able to make this work - they just don't have the leverage with hardware that the big three - MS, Apple, Google - have. While the technical avenue they're going down is interesting and has merit, I don't think that'll resonate with people in the market for a phone. They have a lot of work to do - starting from cold - just to get something that kinda sorta works as well as what's already out there - I just don't think they'll get enough people to switch. Worse if you look at their flagship product - desktop is a metoo! that's haemorraging users and the mobile version is a non-entity. I use and love both, it's a desperate shame - I just cannot for the life of me see Mozilla making headway with this OS.

You got me there. My point, as you no doubt know, was that they're advertising a low headline price and then jacking it up with 'optional' extras that provide core functionality.