HN user
Ideas.
Now back to reality.
Law: Epstein. ICE, Geneva Convention, Segregation
Bill: Going once, going twice, highest bidder wins. Ironic on a Sama thread.
Trial: OJ Simpson. Many miscarriages.
Vigilantism: Revolutions
I am not saying break the law. I am saying look back at history.
"Like this" is doing some serious work in that statement!
Hmm. Android uses the curvy bits for status so the main area is rectangle. So it is OK. It has the advantage of curved corners on casing to reduce chance of cracking screen on a drop.
Well you wont die on that hardened steel cube :)
External keyboard and mouse too easy?
Unless you fly/train travel alot I guess.
Decaf only is great for coffee lovers. Instant decaf is of course just a way to spoil perfectly good hot water. But decaf beans from a good roaster are good then grind and make what you desire - espresso, pour over, french press, moka etc.
Maybe preground OK for non-espresso too?
The way out of this for the seller is to lie and conflate the rich with everyone. "This technology will make your retirement account grow and other countries will be giving us money!"
Nice little puzzle!
People are renowned voting or buying in their own worst interests. And it goes back to before Trump and in many countries.
I read and experience scary stories about AI already. It is not a future maybe thing.
1 hour? I'd go with 3 months.
(Reason is if it is not flagged the spread bet pays out for life!)
If I am going to pay a colo I am going to get a proper server.
Or run the laptop at home and tunnel
Also sounds like a recipe for fire.
This may explain why cold turkey effects for me take 24h to start
17M isn't a lot of money. It is for a person sure. Retire. Cessna. etc. But not to build a butler!
Like saying I prefer websites over CLI, or bicycles over canoes. Chisels over planes. Depends what you are trying to achieve.
The limit to EVs makes it fine (if excl. PHEVs). If BYD/Toyota have more models that is fine for the comparison. That is the point.
Yeah but the OP offhand comment is a political soundbite that is technically half true and half prediction but misleading.
People?
Saw zetaflop in the title. Knew it would be that guy!
Ah I see what you are saying. You are a mattress tester.
That is my point. Who sees them? whatever the algo predicts will engage.
I hope they ran the numbers and did some cold surveying/analysis/postmortem before deciding that.
What is worse is those aren't shitty ad impressions. Interested people will be following maybe even expecting to see them. In addition and ironically also other interested people will be algorithmed in to their orbit.
E.g. I read more of a blogger I like because I follow him on LinkedIn over following RSS feed.
Sounds like: I wont get out of bed for $100k
Yes. And we understand why that looks contradictory. Let us explain.
... paraphrase: meet people where they are at ....
Sounds even more contradictory now!
And the traffic loss doesn't explain it. That is a sunk cost fallacy.
I hate that rn looks like m
I'd only look at human/AI edited files (i.e. that require some kind of reasoning) not generated ones (where the reasoning is in the generator).
Generation is precompilation.
Entry point is interesting. Lots of scope to become a scary file.
Found an excerpt online. Seems like a gem of a book.
Yep Googlers... Metans... don't throw stones.
Works for me now, thanks!
Yep but the idea goes back further. Memory is vague but this may have been it. https://www.ajaxtoolkit.net/DynamicPopulate/DynamicPopulate....