meeech

question: anyone recognize that eval UI or is it something they made in-house?

if you find yourself in montreal, message me - i will do it, for science!

something requiring navigating stairs while holding something full like a laundry basket. bronze - straight stairs, silver - one 90deg turn. gold - spiral.

something requiring co-ordination between 2 robots. think relay race which the olympics has. So say, moving a couch together.

btw love the idea and the silver body suit. good stuff.

their product doesn't taste like crap. Unless you meant it tasted like crap to you? I liked it as the 'meat' in a veg chilli for example.

thanks. to be clear, I'm not asking the q to be particularly negative about it. Its more just curiosity, mixed with trade in effort. If you wrote it 100%, I'm more inclined to read the whole thing. vs say now just feeding it back to the GPM to extract the condensed nuggets.

Disallow edit in test dirs is a good tip. thanks.

I meant though in the wider context of the team - everyone uses it but not everyone will work the same, use the same underlying prompts as they work. So how do you ensure everyone keeps to that agreement?

Q: How do you ensure tests are only written by humans? Basically just the honor system?

Honest question: approx what percent of the post was human vs machine written?

don't discount the value of a good docs site. that was one of things i loved about lodash that made it so easy to use, and to discover all the functionality it offered. So if you looking to replace it, would be good to have similar docs.

At this point, I think it's safe to say it doesn't 'feel' that way. It is that way. Sorry if you were being facetious and I didn't pick up on it.

Are you the one doing the coaching? Wouldn't this be part of coaching them?

because there were some interesting nuggets. Maybe nothing new to you - but not everyone has read everything on the topic. though this was more about their process rather than an 'engine'. but you know, headlines /shrug

I've been pretty happy with Codeium free offering. it does good context completions for me, and based on context, gives me the next bits I'm about to type.

I used cody at work, and the best feature for that I found was chore work - I could highlight a struct (for example) and give it instructions how to transform it and it did a good job there.

tbh i wanted to try it. But there's not even a privacy policy. And you asking for access to a lot of stuff (public and private)

This 100% happens in businesses. Not just gov/non-business.

This is funny to see today because I had exact same experience, but with UPS. Call came in, marked as Probable Spam. Robot voice on the line, claiming to be from UPS. Duties and taxes. I am expecting a package, so I went to the website and it was legit. Though it won't change, because to do it right would cost them $$$. Whereas doing it wrong costs them less, and it then becomes a me problem.

The comment op clearly states "modern cheap toaster". The toaster you describe is not that.

A totally reasonable response to a minor inconvenience.

this.

Feersum Endjinn is great, but would recommend starting with other culture novels first.

Maybe password reset will be a new perk of twitter blue. Like many people I imagine, i've just been logged in there forever. Wouldn't have my old pw at this point.

Could use fix on this headline - change it to drone

the truth is, pr's might not even be welcome and thats ok. Any code/feature added, even via someone elses PR becomes a maintenance burden on the maintainer.

Remind them they are welcome to fork the project to add what they would like.

"We don't need the government to step in, we need another video streaming company to come in and really compete with Youtube. The problem is that right now, Youtube has no direct competitors"

This is incredibly naive. All that would happen is both services would use similar automated systems for moderation - it is cheaper for them. They would have no incentive to provide good support.

We need regulations that require access to human judgement for digital services. When millions of people use a service, even a 1% error rate in moderation / account disabling has a real impact on a lot of peoples lives.

"I'm not sure what the answer is." The answer is there needs to be some sort of accountability required, where you can reach a human person who can resolve your issue. Under penalty of significant fines.

Thanks. I was just curious about the why. i'm good with working around it.

they could just be deluded.

the cost can be prohibitive for some people

Cool idea. some feedback - you might want to touch on bedrock vs java edition. I know I initially found that one area with little guidance/explanation (wanting to do mods for the switch edition for my kid - afaict, turns out you can't :/ )

just curious.