massappeal

democracy.com and crowdpac.com I think both have info on local candidates available

Agreed. I pulled it from the title of the article I originally read, but knowing that HN prefers primary sources, I linked to the video.

Edit: article link http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/innovations/wp/2014/10/2...

also relevant http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2014/10/comcast-got-me-fi...

do not want

ah ya sorry, it's just for screen sharing. best of luck!

Screenleap

BeyerDynamic Custom One Pro

crunchbase data export

I just bought the Beyerdynamic Custom Pro One (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LDBWrSENTps) for about $200 and I can't recommend them enough

This would be great if all of the footage was automatically archived to a publicly available website, but somehow I feel like this footage will be very hard to get a hold of, similar to FOIA Requests

Can you back some? I'd love this for some old Steve McQueen outfits

nope

Ya, I disagree. If I was going to do my own start-up, I would definitely chose SF over NY.

New York just feels like the past to me; the old world where with old money where I'm likely to find people with generic backgrounds.

The West Coast is pushing the world forward, and I feel like I'm more likely to find people with the variety of backgrounds necessary to make a start-up successful.

This is a very complex question; I'll see if I can help.

Before I begin though, let me just say that you could take an entire undergrad and postgrad course on the economic, social and political development of Africa, because non-African nations have almost as much to do with the current state of Africa as the African nations.

Let's start by addressing why some countries are poor. There are many reasons some countries are poorer than others, and I would hate to over-generalize, but I'm going to. Access to International Trade, having resources worth trading Internationally for, the domestic resources available to develop a valuable workforce and a stable and effective form of governance.

Generally speaking.

Malawi for instance. Even if it had some tremendous resource it could sell in International markets, there aren't any regional buyers to pay for the development of further infrastructure. It doesn't have direct access to major trading centers and routes. If it wanted to develop a workforce to export something of value that wasn't dug up from the ground, it would need investment in order to pay for the education, infrastructure, etc. And that gets us into foreign aid and development banks, but we're just going to avoid that for now.

But even if it had all of that, the purchasing power of International markets greatly effect the International distribution of wealth.

Great example: The U.S. is one of the top oil-producing countries in the world. Despite this, we continue to import almost all of our oil. Why is this? Because American energy companies make more money by selling our oil internationally than they would domestically, so they do, and we end up buying cheaper oil from somewhere else.

Even if Malawi was swimming in some resource, maintaining domestic ownership of said resources and making it cheap enough to compete with countries that heavily subsidize certain industries can make it impossible to repeat.

Another great example of this: NAFTA.

The North American Free Trade Agreement is a FTA between Canada, U.S. and Mexico. We promised Mexico that by enacting this agreement, American companies would move all their factories from Asia to Mexico, employing millions. What happened though was that even after NAFTA, it was still cheaper for us to manufacture in Asia. But what the U.S. and Canada got in exchange for the "promise" was the removal of import tariffs on Financial Capital and Corn, among other things. As it happens, the U.S. subsidizes the Corn industry here to the tune of $9-12b per year.

As a result, it became cheaper for Mexico to import Corn from the U.S. than it was to buy domestically. And in case you don't know this, Corn ("maize") is a huge staple of Mexican agriculture. They make everything out of corn. So now, all of a sudden, Mexico has millions and millions of unemployed farmers. Who do you think has been rushing to the American borders all these years?

On top of that, by allowing us to freely invest in Mexican companies without tariffs, American banks purchased controlling interests in almost all of Mexico's highest-grossing companies. So anytime a Mexican company makes money, the revenue flows back to NYC, rather than back into Mexico.

I tried to keep that simple and direct. I'm sure I missed some details on a lot of that, so please correct where I erred.

Hope this helped!

I don't know about 'disruptive', but I know there are companies like WealthFront and SimpleBank are in the private banking/wealth management space

given that the funds have already been approved for the state's alternative, I wouldn't hold my breath

lol the irony is killing me right now

google maps, gmail and google docs would be tough to replace, but I think we'd adapt pretty quickly. waze is pretty good, outlook is different but not necessarily bad, and I could probably use Dropbox more. And to be honest I search more on DuckDuckGo now than I do Google. I don't think google is indispensable, it's just consolidated, which makes it more convenient.

can you elaborate a little bit for me? why the distaste for QuickMVP?

Livin the dream, Dang

you might find this interesting http://gselevator.wordpress.com/2013/09/04/meet-jack-the-plu...

I would stay away from the lot. They are like bad Michael Bay movies with costumes.

Streak. Only. Ever.

here's the real link http://www.summerofmarketing.com/

You may find this article by Sam Altman and the discussion that stemmed off it informative

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7610527

ya but not one of them is going to save Yahoo!. Yahoo!'s problem is that they're too large to be a media company but too small to be a technology company, so inevitably, they are neither.

Naval Ravikant. Not to accuse him of femininity, but I think he's building his own little army over at Angellist, and a few of them are bound to be Dragons in the near future.

this is kinda pissing me off. Melissa Meyer shares no personality traits with Khaleesi, but they are the same because she's the only woman leading a major tech company?

Saying Peter Cashmore is the equivalent of Jamie Lannister is even worse. Saying that one represents the other because they share "dashing good looks, their flowing blonde locks, their square jaws, their piercing eyes" (all of which fall under the category of "dashing good looks" btw) is like when dudes say that this chick and that chick both have big boobs, so their obviously the same, as if they are devoid of personality. Jamie is defined by his skills as a warrior and his DGAF attitude as much, if not more, than he is for his looks.

I will concede though that the comment of Elon Musk discovering alien life by staring idly at the sky one day was pretty funny.

Agreed. Make it a Roth IRA and you're set.

I think their funnier if you understand the subtle Watterson references. The 3rd panel of the 2nd strip for instance references Bill's career-long battle over the confinement of the existing panel structure.