HN user

marsh_mellow

203 karma
Posts16
Comments10
View on HN
venturebeat.com 5mo ago

NanoClaw solves one of OpenClaw's biggest security issues

marsh_mellow
46pts28
www.qodo.ai 11mo ago

Benchmarking GPT-5 on 400 real-world code reviews

marsh_mellow
72pts80
thenewstack.io 11mo ago

Kubernetes Will Solve YAML Headaches with Kyaml

marsh_mellow
4pts0
www.quantamagazine.org 1y ago

Matter vs. Force: Why There Are Two Types of Particles

marsh_mellow
2pts0
www.quantamagazine.org 1y ago

Improving Deep Learning with a Little Help from Physics

marsh_mellow
10pts0
www.token.security 1y ago

Determining IaC ownership – a tag-based approach

marsh_mellow
5pts6
aws.amazon.com 1y ago

Expanded language support in Amazon Q Developer

marsh_mellow
1pts0
docs.anthropic.com 1y ago

Computer Use API Documentation

marsh_mellow
13pts2
techcrunch.com 1y ago

The U.S. AI Safety Institute stands on shaky ground

marsh_mellow
2pts0
www.anthropic.com 1y ago

Developing a Computer Use Model

marsh_mellow
3pts1
thenewstack.io 1y ago

AI Agents: A Comprehensive Introduction for Developers

marsh_mellow
1pts0
engineering.atspotify.com 1y ago

How We Generated Millions of Content Annotations

marsh_mellow
3pts0
github.com 1y ago

Open-source tool for LLM document processing pipelines from UC Berkeley

marsh_mellow
1pts0
chromewebstore.google.com 1y ago

PR-Agent — extension that adds AI chat to code reviews on GitHub

marsh_mellow
24pts15
www.infosecurity-magazine.com 1y ago

US Government Sets Out to Improve Internet Routing Security

marsh_mellow
41pts8
www.uber.com 1y ago

Pinot for Low-Latency Offline Table Analytics

marsh_mellow
1pts0

p-value of 7.9% — so very close to statistical significance.

the p-value for GPT-4.1 having a win rate of at least 49% is 4.92%, so we can say conclusively that GPT-4.1 is at least (essentially) evenly matched with Claude Sonnet 3.7, if not better.

Given that Claude Sonnet 3.7 has been generally considered to be the best (non-reasoning) model for coding, and given that GPT-4.1 is substantially cheaper ($2/million input, $8/million output vs. $3/million input, $15/million output), I think it's safe to say that this is significant news, although not a game changer

I don't think the absolute score means much — judge models have a tendency to score around 7/10 lol

55% vs. 45% equates to about a 36 point difference in ELO. in chess that would be two players in the same league but one with a clear edge

Good point. They said they validated the results by testing with other models (including Claude), as well as with manual sanity checks.

55% to 45% definitely isn't a blowout but it is meaningful — in terms of ELO it equates to about a 36 point difference. So not in a different league but definitely a clear edge

From OpenAI's announcement:

Qodo tested GPT‑4.1 head-to-head against Claude Sonnet 3.7 on generating high-quality code reviews from GitHub pull requests. Across 200 real-world pull requests with the same prompts and conditions, they found that GPT‑4.1 produced the better suggestion in 55% of cases. Notably, they found that GPT‑4.1 excels at both precision (knowing when not to make suggestions) and comprehensiveness (providing thorough analysis when warranted).

https://www.qodo.ai/blog/benchmarked-gpt-4-1/