markhalonen

same. It's brilliant and I pay them nothing.

I tell friends and family about it all the time, but I can't seem to convince anyone to use for it every subscription like I do.

would be great to block all cookie popups. Pry would need to be a chrome extension

big discussion was had around this a month ago https://candid9.com/phone-camera/

Awesome! It's a very simple workflow, here's another video that I don't have on the website for reference https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OctwOpaNoJQ

Yes one use-case is a gig-economy street photography practice, which does already exist in places like the Brooklyn Bridge, Candid9 makes that easier.

Another use-case perhaps in your case is to do it for free and do higher volume and market your money-making services? I agree that it is fun and mood-lifting to take portraits, but also it would be cool to make it sustainable.

but yeah overall Candid9 is a hammer looking for a nail right now.

Right but at the same time, Average Joe will take better photos with a digicam because they'll behave exactly like I did and make the same mistakes, so arguably it's very naive but also an accurate depiction of the average idiot who clicks a shutter

I don't really understand the current street photographers as I don't know how they would ever make money. Basically if you're already a street photographer, then you aren't motivated by money, which the pitch of Candid9 is that you'll make money. So pre-existing street photographers paradoxically are not the target market.

@throwanem I think I hit the depth limit so replying here. I would be happy to chat about how a street photographer could use Candid9, but do know that I've made plenty of money in other businesses and this is a fun passion project for me, so I'm not begging on my knees for someone to use my side project.

It is true that I was standing closer and using a wide-angle lens with the iPhone. But it wasn't on purpose to tip the scales, I was just taking an iPhone photo as I've done many times.

So it would be a fairer comparison to use a longer focal length, but it's also true that I am the Average Joe, and Average Joe took a better photo with the camera, because it guided me in that direction more than the iPhone did.

What kind of volume are you doing?

Most I've done is 60 group photos in an hour at a trade show.

Really, what it looks like to me is just that you have a product that costs ~nothing to operate

Correct

and seems like it sort of makes sense for smallish wedding-and-anniversary party venues

I would say the intended use case is destination venues like a upscale golf course or hotel.

the ask to add a Wal Mart style belt mounted printer to my kit

Not how it works. If you looked at the website, you'd see that you print and cut the tickets at home before hand on a normal printer.

It's bizarre to me in what world you live where this constitutes "easier," but I also don't care

Handing someone a ticket is easier than collecting their email.

You want to intermediate and transactionalize a relationship so ephemeral it can already be nearly overlooked even to exist, and where your presence is unneeded and unwelcome - and mine is the most HN comment ever?

I have unlimited confidence and patience. Hit me with the snarkiest rebuttal you can muster!

most hn comment of all time. The whole point of the product is that giving someone a QR code ticket is easier than collecting email or phone number, which makes a big difference at high volume.

I am the creator of Candid9 and I have taken about 290 photos of strangers and distributed them via candid9 QR codes. Happy to chat about it!

How do you take a 45mm focal length photo with iPhone?

I've had passer-bys take group photos with a real camera, no problem. What issues do you run into?

which lens on my iPhone? Just the camera app like everyone else. For the good photo, it's a 30mm lens on Sony a6400 (45mm equivalent)

the player in green has a substantial lean as well. Download the photo and crop and you can see it.

it seems you accept having your skin color changed by the iPhone algorithm... I do not accept that so was making light of it

sony a6400 with sigma 30mm f/1.4, but then the child one is a 2004 Digicam I think a Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W5

you'll have to believe me when I say they are not leaning. They were just standing there posing for the photo.

Would love for someone else to get more scientific about it, but I think the results would be the same.

digicams are making a huge comeback among young adults. Even a pocket digicam is a big step up from iPhone imo.

iPhones always take "decent" photos even under tricky conditions, but they never take great photos. I would take 10 great photos over 100 decent photos myself.

"you will have the average complexion and you will like it" rofl

The iPhone photo in the blog is iPhone 16 Pro which has the 3 lenses (I am the author).

I was born in 95, so my childhood is well documented by my mothers digicam. When I look back at the photos, it is very obvious they are way better than iPhone photos that many parents are taking today.

woah I am the author. I don't even have analytics set up on this site, but hope everyone enjoys it!

Here's a cool writeup from PC Mag 1995 about accounting softwares: https://books.google.com/books?id=yurvRCerf_UC&pg=PA273#v=on...

Not much has changed!

This is actually how I discovered Perspective!

I suggest https://perspective.finos.org/ for data viz to be built in. We use DuckDB paired with Perspective for client-side BI use case, and it's been great.

I recently evaluated web tech stacks and my thesis is that Next.js is the most powerful and will win in the long run, but right now it's a bit too new for most web projects -- the ones that are low-traffic, simple apps. Migrating your codebase to another version is just not that fun, and I deemed that still too common in Next.js

implementing double-entry accounting for the 10,000th time in human history on our ERP/MES product.