HN user
You can get more information and weigh in with a message to Congress on these bills at:
HR 6530: Global Free Internet Act of 2012 https://www.popvox.com/bills/us/112/hr6530
HR 6529: ECPA 2.0 https://www.popvox.com/bills/us/112/hr6529
That's why we deliver messages via POPVOX electronically.
See above. Heritage is using a POPVOX iFrame widget. They have no control over the messages. It all feeds into the POPVOX system and we deliver the messages to Congress.
If you would like to weigh in on any bill in Congress (or pick up a widget to use on your own site) you can do so on POPVOX: http://popvox.com
Hi all - I'm a former Congressional staffer and a co-founder of POPVOX. We built POPVOX precisely because of the ineffectiveness of so many other methods.
Heritage Action is using a POPVOX widget -- any site can do the same. https://www.popvox.com/services/widgets
Yes, organizations that conduct grassroots campaigns are frequently partisan, but POPVOX is absolutely NOT. We are just a platform for getting messages to Congress and providing a transparent record of what Congress is hearing.
We work very closely with Congressional offices to make sure messages go in in the best way possible -- with a 100% delivery guarantee. If for any reason it doesn't go electronically (99.5 % do), we print it out and hand deliver. You can see when you message is delivered on your POPVOX home page.
In July, House Democrats announced that POPVOX info is now feeding directly into their internal staff intranet via APIs. http://www.democraticwhip.gov/content/whip-hoyer-announces-h... We're working to make that a bipartisan, bicameral thing.
At POPVOX, our first investor was Tim O'Reilly. Legislative advocacy is a huge market -- and one in great need of disruption.
Here are links to take action on the bills you list. Your message will be sent to the appropriate legislators and aggregated on the public bill report so that you can see how sentiment is shaping up across the country. (The "sentiment across the country" part is important. Even if everyone in Silicon Valley thinks this something is great, the case has to be made to legislators who represent very different districts.)
https://www.popvox.com/bills/us/112/hr3427
https://www.popvox.com/bills/us/112/hr3571
https://www.popvox.com/bills/us/112/s1965
https://www.popvox.com/bills/us/112/s1826
https://www.popvox.com/bills/us/112/hr2941
Thanks, David - yes, we would love the input at POPVOX (info@popvox.com)
New alerts system is imminent, so please check it out.
BTW - we had our own go at crowdfunding for POPVOX. I explained on Quora how we had to turn down non-qualified investors: http://b.qr.ae/nXFsiM
We ended up with a crowdfunding variation to raise the money for our iPad app for Congress through Appbackr (MarkUp - the first app designed for Congress http://bit.ly/uLSrOT). See article in Entrepreneur magazine on the fundraising: http://bit.ly/rKQSzS
Thanks for the post, Dev (and for alerting the POPVOX team.) Also, thanks for the links to POPVOX, Tobu.
As Tobu mentioned, POPVOX is a starting place for some of what you describe. The simple origin was the team's experience with the legislative process (me as a Congressional staffer) seeing what actually influenced how legislation was written and moved through the process -- and Members' ultimate voting decisions.
I think your point that "our reactions are almost entirely based on the interpretation of a few and signals we take from peer groups" is entirely applicable to Members of Congress. POPVOX is an attempt to give people outside of Congress the same kind of information. This includes: 1) Official information 2) Where other Members stand (co-sponsorships) 3) Positions taken by organizations 4) What constituents say
On (1), we provide links to the summaries from the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service (CRS), for neutral, expert summaries of what the bill actually does.
On (2), Members of Congress are just like you and me. They know that they usually agree with Members X, Y, and Z; so when considering whether to co-sponsor, they may literally ask, "Is Member X on?" It is not at all unusual for one staffer to call another office and say, "My boss is looking at H.R. 1234 but we saw you guys aren't on it, why not?". This is one place where the internal caucuses play a role. You may frequently see the House "Blue Dogs" or "New Dems" taking similar positions.
To me, the area that was most influential in Congress and most underrated outside of Congress (and within the media) was (3), the statements of endorsement or opposition of the various organizations. When a Member is considering a bill, they will always want to know, "where is X group on this" (whether that is Labor, NRA, "the doctors", the enviros, the Chamber, etc.)
This is not only because these groups bring organization and resources to the fight -- it is that they actually are watching and evaluating how various bills would affect their membership. If you are a Member of Congress who cares about the environment and tend to line up with the Sierra Club most of the time, you want to know if they see any trouble with a particular bill on dust regulation. If you got an NRA endorsement and you line up with their positions, you want to know if they see red flags on a bill involving reciprocity of carry laws across the states. Congress does not have the resources to have an expert on staff for every niche issue. There is an assumption that if a proposed bill adversely affects a certain group, that group will be watching closely enough to make their objections known. (We think lowering the barrier to entry for this kind of input is an important mission for POPVOX.)
Before POPVOX, there was no one place to go and find statements of groups supporting or opposing bills, or for smaller less plugged-in organizations to even get on the radar screen. We address this by allowing any org to create a profile and register their positions on bills. While we totally agree with you that it would be amazing to have these in concise & clear language, we understand that it is nearly impossible to do that in a neutral way. Our solution was to simply provide a platform for the information to be displayed, not to provide any content. So individuals can "see what Congress sees" and make their own decisions.
The other reason that organization statements are important is because they usually indicate the opinion of their membership, in other words: constituents (4). Though many don't believe it, it cannot be said enough: CONGRESS REALLY DOES CARE WHAT CONSTITUENTS HAVE TO SAY. (I swear, it's true. They come to meetings quoting constituents. They agonize over stories they hear. They clip newspaper editorials. Organized constituents make a difference.)
The problem is that in many cases the people asking you to sign a petition or fax or form letter or tweet or post to Facebook, etc, etc, etc, are not actually getting your message to Congress in a way that can be processed. Jake Brewer identified the problem best in this 2010 article on the "Tragedy of Political Advocacy" http://huff.to/eS1URy. POPVOX changes that, and is working with Congressional staff to deliver messages to Congress in the most effective way possible AND provide a transparent record of what Congress is actually hearing. http://bit.ly/smUl6s
On your last point (about cost info), it may be something we work in later, but at the moment, I would suggest looking at http://www.washingtonwatch.com/, which breaks down each bill with its cost estimates.
We're obviously just getting started with a long way to go and really appreciate the suggestions (here and via email at info@popvox.ocm.) Please keep them coming!
You can always add a POPVOX widget to the site, so people can send a message to Congress directly from HN.
http://popvoxnation.tumblr.com/post/15753030372/protesting-s...
"tocomment" - what do you mean? there's no paywall.