maleldil

How long it takes to train that particular configuration. The table column is named "train time".

The solution to this is editions/epochs, like Rust. You can set your project to the 2025 edition and be sure that, even if future versions introduce breaking changes, they will not affect your project; it will continue to compile as before.

I imagine it could, eventually, if not now. The Bun translation used Anthropic's best model, cost hundreds of thousands of dollars, and still contained a large number of unsafe blocks. Maybe if they left the agent running for longer, using Miri for verification?

translate it to Rust catching all the memory bugs in the process

That's not possible. If it were, you'd just fix the memory bugs directly in the original language.

Your best bet is to have a translation littered with unsafe blocks, so you still have to do the work of nailing down the specifics to make them safe. There's no magic "unsafe language" -> "safe Rust" pipeline, even with GenAI.

ONE angry blog

It's not the first. He recently called GitHub employees "monkeys".

What Bun did here is basically a sabotage of Zig's reputation

How?

I take you haven't read Andrew Kelley's article

Yes, that's the sour opinion piece full of personal attacks.

I'm not saying they are, but if they were, it probably wouldn't be in explicit tool calls shown to the user.

Why would you need that? 99% of the time, you'll just grab the BibTeX from where you're getting the paper (Google Scholar, arXiv, ResearchGate, etc.) and paste it on the .bib file. LaTeX will take care of formatting it when you \cite.

What do you mean by "implementation names"? I assumed you meant changing the "implements X", which should be easy for an LSP.

If you're always reaching for vim commands, why did you stop using it?

It would be the same as in IntelliJ. As long as you have the Java LSP active, you issue the `lsp-rename` action: https://emacs-lsp.github.io/lsp-java/#lsp-mode-commands

This works exactly the same for all languages whose LSP support this action, which is most of them.

Yes, because that's the only way powerful people can influence judicial outcomes.

Codeberg is a non-profit. They only host public FOSS projects. I don't think they're looking for marketing.

I believe a lot of people prefer it for "creative" writing.

Saying people enjoy exercise is only slightly more controversial than saying "ice cream tastes good".

You might be in a bubble. I know many people who exercise regularly, and I'd say most of them only do it because it's healthy. If they found a way to stay healthy without exercise, they'd drop it in a heartbeat.

Nah, even as a leftist, The Economist is mostly in the "enlightened centrist" area. I'd say they're a reliable source of facts as long as you know where their bias is.

If you live within walking distance of a good shop, you likely would make more trips instead of buying in bulk once a week.

The irony of censoring "f*ck" while saying something like that.

ACL conference papers usually cap the main body at 8 pages, with unlimited appendices. KDD has a hard limit of 9 pages plus 3 for references and appendices.

CS conference papers often have page limits (e.g. ACL ARR is 8 pages double-column), so most paper main bodies are exactly that, as it's seen as sloppy if you don't use the full count. I've had someone point out that it's best to use the entire page 8 without leaving any gaps.

There are also appendices, which reviewers aren't required to read. If there's something relevant that doesn't fit in the main body and you don't put it in the appendix, reviewers will point it out and ask for it, and it will influence their grades.

In the end, publishing papers these days is about convincing reviewers rather than actually writing a good paper. And you usually have reviewers asking for all sorts of things.

This operator exists as a macro in rust as dbg[1]. I know this wasn't the point of your comment; I just thought it was a funny coincidence.

[1] https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/macro.dbg.html

You still need it at least on your face and hands. A hat won't completely protect against UV, and you're probably not going to wear gloves in the summer.

It's far harder to overdrink water than it is to overstay in the sun.

Aside from repairability, the MacBooks are the best laptops in every other respect: battery life, keyboards, screens, performance (especially performance per watt) and overall build quality. They're even competitively priced in the current market. Watches have some of the best sensors in their category. iPhones have the best performance and cameras. I can't say much about the AirPods since I've never used them, but people I know report they work very well.

https://xkcd.com/2501/

Even if most people had calculus in high school (which is not a given), I'd expect pretty much anyone who did not go into STEM to promptly forget it, just like I forgot much from chemistry and biology after studying Computer Science.

They said "much of the world", not "most". What they probably meant was something like "the West" or "global North".

Your link is to a random Facebook group, and the source isn't a link. I tried looking for more information in both English and Portuguese and found nothing.

Seems like this is fake news.

What you create is the research along the way, which usually gets published. The dissertation is just a document that examiners read.

What gus_massa was describing doesn't sound like thesis by publication. TBP usually uses the papers verbatim with some added material to make them cohesive to the overall thesis argument. What they described is more like repurposing existing material in a thesis format, which is indeed very common.

MV2 makes those workarounds possible in the first place, which MV3 doesn't.