magackame

I just store them in bitwarden. Wonder what 2FA actually protects against, when any malware will just steal your session tokens anyway.

Bro be using two mice with a screen keyboard.

It seems only encrypt and throw away the key would be the acceptable strategy

Also gotta love the write-only disk as a hardware analogy. Insane write speeds and infinite capacity...

Huh? But there are integrity checks (none in htmx case, which is strange), to prevent exactly this attack.

Should work on building the AI Jensen. Maybe it's already the AI Jensen

Cancel right away? Or are Amazon subs different?

Noooo. Makes me wonder how much money do you need to buy up all the ad slots in the world and replace them with blanks.

If it's known why show it off as if it works?

Don't people do this too all the time?

:shush:

AI bad, AI bad, AI bad. bad bad bad, AI-bad.

How hard is that to fix? Aren't they using CoPilot? Just ask it to fix the invisible icon.

Maybe that's the problem? Imagine a Microsoft employee allowed to program only by using a CoPilot prompt, screaming and begging to just apply a patch he already written without touching anything else :D

Also, any password manager that's "cloud based" is potentially a security hole. Yeah, they say the server is secure. Right.

You think of someone stealing your password vault and cracking AES? The vault is E2EE.

How using a mouse and incurring a context switch is better than just mashing j/k a couple of times in worst case scenario?

Can't you just put the agent behind a REST API and give the other agents a curl tool + doc?

Bard is the old name of Gemini

You can have just caching without bot protection

Anyone remember those online psychological tests where you spend an hour on one and in the end you need to pay up to get the result?)))

That's passkeys. Google and Microsoft are pushing in that direction.

God if it could just be a single key that you dump to paper or titanium plate and don't worry about backing up a zoo of keys/password with a cloud. Just take my one and only public key. If you care about per service privacy, you are welcome to use multiple. I don't think there is any compromise scenario where you would leak any single specific passkey and they are not bruteforcable. Why is it not as simple as that?

There was an attempt in that direction.

https://www.uzbl.org/

Wouldn't it be the same amount of requests as a regular person researching something the old way?

Gonna steal all your files, passwords and crypto as a regular user anyway?

It's fun to see "GPU accelerated" and "like game engine" when literally every application is rendered the same way with the same APIs.

All those beautiful dlls will anyways sit comfortably in the same folder as your "dynamically" linked executable on Windows.

Also had some funky stuff with ambient mode. The whole page renders, video and audio plays, but nothing is interactive. Can't push buttons, can't select text etc etc. Like it renders the page to a png and shows it.

They mean you can press "more" only once for a maximum of 60 vs HNs "infinite" more button.

EDIT: now I know there is max 35 pages of HN

Where? Don't see any on latest main (685467e).

Not sure myself. Commit messages look pretty human. But the emojis in readme and comments like "// Re-export key structs for easier access", "# Add any test-specific dependencies here if needed" are sus indeed.