lo0dot0

I think that the solution is very simple, remove the citation metric. Citations don't mean correctness. What we want is correctness.

Do the cars not have a trunk door on the back?

Tunnels can recoup their cost easily if they are used massively by many people every day. Any reason why you are against building a subway / underground railway?

Yes. Similarly, safety needs to be there even after the aging of materials over product lifetime. So basically when aging is the only variable to be considered end of life date is the worst case scenario.

There must be measurements of the fuel tanks state, right?

Seeing a discord channel for special software recommended on a corporate presentation was definitely a first for me. Happened yesterday.

Fritzbox brand and possibly others updates itself automatically by default. ISPs often also control the devices they ship to clients and install updates as part of a "fleet management".

"if you don't know what you're doing don't do it" vs. "Secure out of the box"

You're arguing for sending money to criminal organizations which will make them more powerful. It's a terrible advice.

Agree that we are allowed to waste time. Sending money to scammers doesn't help anyone it just makes whoever is in charge of the criminal ring more powerful.

Not liking a writing style because LLMs use it is not a good reason. What exactly do you dislike about it?

Answers would be more helpful if you answered based on the panel you were using rather than saying it depends on the panel

The display can only show a video well that has this property of only updating parts of the screen but not everything at the same time? What if the video content is like so?

No, measuring light doesn't remove the air quality confounder. Measuring air quality would allow to remove the air quality confounder. What are you smoking?

It's also good practice to chose an appropriate language for the problem. It's not premature optimisation to use a compiled language instead of Python when you already know the code will run thousands of times in a loop because of the application and use a lot of electrical energy in the process.

A part of my question that you didn't go into was, can new knowledge be added in a new version without making the answers with knowledge learned in previous versions non-deterministic?

The answers can be recorded and reviewed. The other points are true, or is there a way to make outcomes deterministic, when compared to previous versions while allowing to add more knowledge in newer versions?

You don't need context there is terms and services that no one reads

It's also not possible to tap into the full amount of reduction because of the land use

If you are unsure what you are doing, do not do it. For example, I just posted to hackernews. The button in my app says "submit", but doesn't warn me about posting to the internet. Is there any problem with that? No, because I know what I'm doing and anyone using the Internet should too.

Even if you can not compute the result in a finite number of steps through the naive approach there could still be a better approach, let me call it shortcut, for determining the value that can be computed. E.g. the geometric series result is known (a/(1-r)) but not computable through evaluating the series itself. A problem is undecidable if you can prove that the shortcut can not exist, it is decidable if you know a shortcut exists (knowing the formula is not required), and potentially either decidable or undecidable if a proof in either direction is unknown.

While it technically correct to say this it also gets the wrong point across because it leaves out the fact that ordering changes create only a small difference. Other examples where arithmetic is not commutative, e.g. matrix multiplication , can create much larger differences.

Obviously this is not how video compression and packets work but for the sake of the argument consider the following. The article speaks of a 300 fiber cable. A one bit per pixel square image with approx. 300 pixels is 17x17 in size. Not your typical video resolution.

Optics also have signal integrity issues. In practice OSNR and SNR limit optics. Cutting the fiber still breaks it. Small vibrations also affect the signal's phase.

No, not necessarily. If you can distinguish different amplitude levels you can do better. For example four amplitude modulation (4AM) carries two bits per symbol. There is also the option to use coherent optics, which can detect phase, and carry additional information in the phase.

Algorithms can see the difference between RGB 245, 245, 245 and RGB 246, 245, 245 (it's 1, 0, 0) but the eye can probably not, also depending on the monitor hardware. Thus the blurring effect might not be as strong as it looks like at first glance.

Maybe they also provide an AI hotline they have to sell to you?

It's pretentious to say something is "novel" when people have raided each other for valuables for centuries.

Clicking on links in emails is a security risk because they could be spam. I don't do that unless it's the only way to move forward and then I double check the url. Basically I only use it to sign up then never again if possible.

What's the advantage of HMAC over basic auth when TLS is used as a transport?