linotype

It’s relevant if the drivetrain is part of your identity. People like the vroom vroom. I drive an EV but I’m not about to ban others from driving what they want.

He’s the one that said it was in the guidelines, not me.

We were in fact worried about being locked up.

Where you apparently have to search for the text from one person to see if speech is allowed or not.

His word is the law.

Well now that sounds dystopian.

That would be the idea of the static page. Save people time from reading an article they aren’t actually interested in.

There would be no comments, just a summary of the contents of the post with a link to post.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

Not according to the guidelines and the upvotes the comment received.

That creates a ton of traffic to LLMs for the same summary. Why not have one person do it and post it?

This could be said about any hobby. Why should people that like to read buy physical books? Why should people that like to take photographs print on film? Etc.

It was convenience so dozens or hundreds of people didn’t have to. Seriously regret trying to be helpful here.

Your comment adds way less value than the one I generated, reviewed and posted. I refuse to be bullied by people that are anti-AI.

They’re free to delete it. I think it adds value.

Again, please point out what’s wrong in the post and I will correct it.

This _is_ them closing the loophole.

She didn’t commit the DUI in Canada, she did in the US. We were in the country for three days (Victoria) and didn't even have a car, so she couldn’t have recommitted the offense even if she wanted to, which she obviously wouldn’t want to.

How has immigration ruined Canada?

Security screening, not border control at airports etc.

Can you point out what part of the summary is wrong? You’re welcome to write your own summary that’s as detailed as the one I posted with any necessary corrections and I’ll delete my post.

Canada stopped and denied entry to my wife for a five year old DUI until we coughed up a $250 fee which felt like a bribe. This was ten years ago.

Can anyone explain a rational political motivation behind this? I realize "less immigrants" is the hand-wavy explanation, but how does this benefit those in charge?

I recommend you read the link, which in the first few words outlines “non-immigrants” and my summary.

Adjudicating Nonimmigrant Visa Applicants in Their Country of Residence

Some people really like LEGO and collect sets. Why do you consider LEGO garbage?

CP wants to close a lot of post offices, complete the phase-out of door-to-door postal service in favour of community mailboxes (which are already in use for more than half of households), and even reduce delivery frequency to less than 5 days per week.

Honestly that sounds like some good ways to reduce costs and carbon emissions. For the elderly there would need to be some considerations made. I live in the US but in large apartment buildings here there’s a couple of mailrooms for hundreds of units, I imagine it’s significantly more efficient than delivering to each unit.

You’re only hurting yourself and your friends. At least in LA we’re as pissed off about the current admin as anyone else and love it when people visit.

Oh darn, people buying less cheap shit.

At some point there will be no car for sale less than $50k. Without factoring in inflation, price is meaningless.

It’s not “Anti-Chinese”. If Australia subsidized their car sector and exported a bunch of cars at a purchase price less than the cost to make a car in the US, the complaint would be the same.

Except they are, they’re rolling out new cities all the time.

.

Nm