ktm5j

Well presumably they might take this evidence seriously, since this time they're the ones who hired someone to do the research. Which is why I feel (maybe overly) optimistic that this might finally settle the issue.

I assumed this was specifically in response to the Reuters deal, so my comment was off-base.

This may be an unpopular opinion, but is this really the best way to respond here? Won't this just give them the opportunity to claim that California is doing this specifically to hide fraud? $125 mil is a drop in the bucket compared to ICE's budget, if they want to spend it like this why not just let them? Thomson Reuters has an excellent track record of being impartial/non-partisan.. maybe we could finally get past the nonsense election rigging claims. Just my 2c

Ben Krasnow is just awesome, highly recommend his channel if anyone is into this kind of thing.

This is super cool, I've always used ncdu for this kinda thing but I like this a lot better. Thanks for sharing!

Most people are not going to do that though :/

That sounds like a fun thing to wonder about, but how could anyone possibly know that for sure?

It's not supposed to wrap or be responsive.. It's a tradition of making text legible on vintage terminals. I use `fill-paragragh` in emacs to format my commit messages like this 'cause I'm a dork hehe

There's also stuff like Thinlinc, NoMachine, X2Go and a bunch of others, all of which use SSH as the primary backend. This is a pretty common idea.

What industry doesn't have a few too many marketers? Take everything with a grain of salt.

Weird.. I have almost this exact same "cheat sheet" printed out and stuck up on my whiteboard.. except it's slightly different. Only 4 panels instead of 6 and the panels don't have titles.

I know this is a solid "cool story bro" moment, but whatever hah

If that's really the case (which isn't really clear from this post) then I feel like we're missing some details.

Yeah that's kind of the impression that I had.. should have ran it past his superiors. Hope he learns something from this instead of deflecting like he seems to be doing.

It's a paid product, they are actually allowed to do this. Google is obviously going to focus on security testing with their own browser. It's understandable that organizations want to require chrome for their employees to access their workspace in the interest of security, but it's not the default.

There is zero problem here guys.

It's their organization. They are allowed to make decisions about what software their employees use. I'm a die-hard Mozilla fan, but I don't find this unreasonable.

I'd wager on this.

Well, in that case it totally is their fault...

VS Code will helpfully warn you when you open a folder that has a git repository.. it asks if you trust the developers since opening the folder could result in bad things happening. So this might not be such a big deal for VS Code users.

If you put it into geosynchronous orbit, the transmission is easier but now you've introduced a huge delay in your packets.

How does that introduce a delay?

I used to host email servers for a university, I'm probably going to have nightmares tonight just because I read this post hah

Oh I love them quite a lot! I use them to run all of our backup jobs, easy to set up and have never had an issue.

I get what you're saying but I can understand the frustration here. Vivado licenses start at $1200/year or $5000 for a perpetual license.. Just to use software to work with hardware that you already paid for. And it's not like they are dropping support for Linux altogether, it would cost them nothing to continue supporting Linux in the free tier.

It just seems like a weird decision on AMD's part.

Okay guys, I'm being downvoted for asking questions? Let's be real, OSS has not been proven to be more secure. If you think otherwise then please back it up, I'm okay with being proven wrong.

Okaaay I'll take a look at the newfangled thingy :P

No, I'm asking questions...... not pretending I have answers.

I've heard that argument before, but has that actually been demonstrated? Ability to look at the code (especially in the age of AI) means that security researchers aren't the only ones who can look for bugs. For example, look at the bugs like copyfail that AI has recently uncovered in the Linux kernel.

Great answer ..

Can I ask why?

I hear you, but I feel like it's a better safe than sorry situation. Exporting your passwords takes two seconds. I think you can export to an encrypted file, but I just did a plain-text json file and gpg'd it. Can't hurt to play it safe.

And I hope you get a clue Mr "I've got everything so figured out that I can psychoanalyze people from a two sentence internet comment". Gimme a break.