kshitij_libra

This seems very useful. Why not make it paid ? Do you think your customers won’t buy ? Have you tried ?

What would your customers need to make them want to pay for it ?

Do you plan to write the book ? I’d like to read it

IMG_0163 - Gold

nopes.. beyond starter projects, raw usage of chatgpt hardly leads to any gains in productivity in the enterprise setting .

So far no, but in the future with more specific and enterprise suitable tooling - likely

Yes, but then a PhD is a chicken and egg problem. You can't get into the top PhD programs under a respectable professor - unless you have some publications under your name.

So how does one get published, enough to get into a good PhD program?

Right. I think the ability to run tests/compilation as a feedback mechanism is definitely interesting .

I wonder whether the problem is that its landed on an incorrect output sample (i.e re-sampling another code output would fix it ) .. vs … a feedback loop on the compiler output is what it really needs ..

No, I meant to ask HN, but didn’t realise that if I put a URL it doesn’t start a discussion.. and now there is no delete button

Other tasks have an element of looping which is really fundamental in computer science

Have you tried any of these agent based workflows that claim to be able to loop with some amount of reasoning ?

100% I’d rather have specialised LLMs that can solve some hairy problems like CSS , than what we have now

Precisely. I think it helps with smaller/mundane tasks (that it has seen in its training), but the tasks that actually require a higher level reasoning and understanding of the bigger picture - are not something we can expect the current LLM's to do.

However as I was researching, there are a few interesting ideas in this space that might help these LLM's solve more complex problems in the future. Post here if interested: https://kshitij-banerjee.github.io/2024/04/30/can-llms-produ...

After using code LLMs' for a bit, I wonder whether there is significant productivity gain in using them. I found that its limited for me.

Main reason: a) to find the right code, I have to keep sampling it, and b) it doesn't seem to be able to solve larger / more complex problems that I actually find more need for.

I found some interesting research on combining planning-algorithms for complex problems, and some ideas on guiding the LLM's decoding process towards correctness by optimizing it via reward functions and reducing the search space. I've detailed and summarised the main points in the post above.

Questions:

1) Do you find code LLM's really useful? Please share some stories / examples where they help vs they didn't. I'm trying to form a better understanding they are just fancy, vs actually productive and useful to most

2) Any other research ideas being pursued in this field ? / what are you trying ?

Hi - ( some questions as i’m curious about your entrepreneurship journey )

Does anyone pay for this ? how does this compare to other products ? what made you build this ?

This trend really needs to die. If you can’t come up with an original paper name , maybe the contents aren’t that original either

Is this how you kill superman?

Meta, Shopify - both companies reject the Agile + Microservice cult

yeah, I think I like your approach, but the multiplayer aspect seems to be a great add-on, as opposed to a must-have feature to get the product started.

Both Go and Rust, and wasm are new to me - so i'm wondering about whether one is superior to the other.

I think figma has a lot of feature, and penpot seems a great replica of it, but I'm not too sure if the SVG + Clojurescript is a great way to build it..

I'm really looking for the core figma feature set to build. 1. Ability to have a canvas with zooms / freedom to create elemnets 2. Components and instances, and tree structured layers 3. Autolayout + CSS options. Frames and Pages

I think with the above 3, there's a viable basic feature set that would get one off the ground.

I did try the figma plugin apis, to extend native figma capabilities - but there's a limit to things you can do with it and it's getting to a point where more investment in the figma plugin seems a bit wasteful

Yeah, PenPot (mentioned in the comments below), seems to have chosen SVG as their choice of rendering. But, looking at a few customer reviews - the performance issue seems to be noticable with the SVG approach (zooms are not clean, and more than 20 screens it starts feeling slow).

Wasm seems appropriate. Why Go, instead of Rust ?

nice! Are you affiliated/ working at penpot?

The Great Mental Models - Shane Parrish

https://github.com/papers-we-love/papers-we-love/tree/master...

Thank me later

How to quit YouTube addiction . Social media is still doable imo but YouTube is just a dopamine doze I can’t seem to quit

And motivation . The exposure to the problem gives you motivation to solve it . If someone randomly gave this idea, one could probably just ignore it ..

Assuming a buy, gitlab becomes part of gcp offering in the coming future ? :D

I understand that’s the general idea, and that’s what every one out there says , but secretly I hope for some killer advice on how not to kill yourself doing a startup . Coz life’s short . Maybe there is some strong advice that would be really helpful

Are there good examples of entrepreneurs who are able to maintain a healthy balance ? How does one balance life and startup (especially on initial stages)

Well, I think intrinsic ineffeciency of storing all that data inside your central and then running huge spark jobs to crunch through them creates huge costs in the first place that probably needs to be offset by higher margins being charged from the end consumer. If you can just monitor the users engagement with your offering and charge on that without having to actually go through countless logs to do that, might be what the author is leaning to. But yeah, easier said than done. Knowing which metrics to capture back centrally itself could be a challenging thing to do, if the data is decentralized ....

I think the point would be that the central server `could` gather aggregated data / important business metrics that it could use to provide further value. I think the author also mentions something like this. Ex: provide analytics back to the end user that could be a paid service, or use that information to provide a second set of b2b offerings to other partners. etc.

Apart from bigbluebutton are there any other open-source video conferencing solutions out there ?

Rather than so many different versions of flawed product. I wonder how things would work out if a lot of creative individuals solved and made better the same problem.

Also, I think another pain point is that webcam and audio setup is tricky to most `windows` pc average user, is there a product that helps figure out the quality score of your setup and potentially help with it ?

Haha Awesome!

Reminds me of a 3D 2048 game I made some years back.

https://kshitij-banerjee.github.io/Cubiks-2048/

Check the dismember view I provided (space bar). That open up the cube to give a better spatial understanding of the board.

That is the problem with 3D games, I realized. Trying to visualize is a pain to most people and deviates them from the game. This was my attempt at solving that.

I think in your case, hovering over a cell and highlighting its adjacent numbers might help create better visual understanding of the state.

Because we’re all getting `dumber in the age of Google`

What's wrong with that ? I fail to understand ? If you start putting everything into your brain, you'll soon go mad. A regular cleanup of the information in your brain to retain only what's relevant for your survival is okay. It's best such things are left googleable. What is the use of keeping in memory the capital of australia, when that trivia contributes a total `0` to do what you do.

If you keep doing, implementing and executing stuff that you are passionate about, I think you'll keep learning. Only thing is that we become more focussed as adults about our interests, than we are as children (inquisitive about everything).