The content of this article is fantastic and frightening.
However, viewing this page on mobile, you can’t help but appreciate the interactivity that feels as though it’s been designed with the mobile reader in mind. It’s marvelous.
HN user
The content of this article is fantastic and frightening.
However, viewing this page on mobile, you can’t help but appreciate the interactivity that feels as though it’s been designed with the mobile reader in mind. It’s marvelous.
No where else can I find a group of people cost benefit analyzing to death one of the purest, simplest, and most fulfilling aspects of life.
The general consensus here seems to be that, "My time is not well spent preparing and consuming, by my own hand, the life giving meals I will eat."
But, of course, I've misspoken. And, now prepare for the assault of many pedantic, infuriated, hacker news commentators.
Weow, excellaent reply budday.
FWIW I would wager that a male would not have to inb4 pedantic arguments. Also that a male would not get so much criticism in regards to nit picky things.
But maybe it's just a common trait of detail oriented programmer types to be pedantic?
It depends. Do you prefer telecommuting or face to face interaction?
Technological globalization has created a situation where, excluding time zone differences, we could communicate in a way that is extremely similar to face to face contact.
Speaking from personal experience, a coding bootcamp might be a good opportunity for you, assuming it is cost effective. Through a coding bootcamp you will have the opportunity to network in regards to tech entrepreneurship and software in general, as well as developing a higher skill level, however you may be proficient enough already.
If I were you I would make a table of pros and cons, based on as many factors as I found to be very important, attribute weights with those factors and make a decision based on the results. Or you could flip a coin and see which side you want it to land on in mid air. That will give you a good idea of which one is more favored by your spinal cord at least.
It's a tough question, good luck!
It does pay to be pro-active.
Just out of curiosity, what do you consider to be significantly deeper? Would you mind offering up an example or two?
I went to a coding boot camp in Omaha, Nebraska of all places.
Less than a month out of the school I was offered a job paying $55,000 a year salary at a large insurance company.
They primarily use Java and Groovy. The bootcamp taught Ruby on Rails. Maybe I got lucky, but I've found that the ability to code is slightly less important than one's ability to speak about programming/code in general.
If you can read and understand documentation, understand fundamental concepts like OO or functional paradigm, and understand what a stack is, a closure, recursion, the difference between an integer and a float, or a character and a string, methods/functions, etcetera, you are more or less hireable.
Basically you have to understand how a computer works, and the fundamental concepts in programming, as well as how to apply them.
However, you do need to have some sort of experience to put on a resume. For instance, if you go to a coding bootcamp you should be able to develop a simple REST API which sends a blob of json from a DB to a URL. That's a relatively complex task, but with a tool set like Ruby on Rails can be done in < week.
Essentially what I am doing at my job is more complex list processing and analysis. Just taking a bunch of data from a db, performing some operations to it, and spitting it back out. Basic stuff.