kreco

Fair. I should have said that the boycott is totally on a different level.

It happens to be Russian. So people boycott it.

You may note that when US goes to war nobody boycott the US.

I was kind of thinking of switching to codeberg, but now I am questioning their decisions here.

It reads to me that you are afraid of getting your project removed if you ever move. No need to pretend you care about the morality of their decision.

I was expecting a a link to the source code after the "written in C".

The title made me realized that there is less and less use of the "serverless".

Which was one of the most non-sensical word to say "You don't maintain the server".

I find his comment interesting. It's just mundane feedback, but still a feedback.

Likewise, you could ignore his comment but decided to engage.

"yes it has a reputation for being confusing, but much of it is undeserved"

This is not what is written here:

Git is not nearly as confusing as people make it out to be. They just never take the few hours it takes to understand it. Which is a sad state of affairs for such an essential tool in the belt of any software engineer.

just does not cut it, if you call yourself a professional.

You've made one and only one point in this thread so far: I'm addressing only that point. You've provided no other elaborations. You're saying "it has a reputation for being confusing, therefore it is confusing." That's a bullshit statement, IMO.

I'll repeat myself, I can show you thousands of messages point out how git is confusing. I can show you plenty of message saying "I used X it was fine, but I used git and it's cumbersome", please show me the same amount of messages telling "I used git it was fine, but I used XXX and it's cumbersome."

You are moving the goalposts.

I could show you thousands of message backing up the confusion.

But you can keep nitpick irrelevant part of messages and pretend you are very smart.

This is irrelevant to the topic.

I didn't ask why git was widely used. I didn't say git was useless.

Again, there were version controls before git came out.

You conveniently cherry picked the least relevant part of my message.

No one said everything should be easy as pie.

There are other software similar to git that have not such reputation. Version control is not new.

There is no aggression.

If your product has a reputation to confuse users compared to other products, your product confuses users.

Let's not start to bend reality just to back up some narrative because after reading a N hours documentation everything is OK.

Git is not nearly as confusing as people make it out to be.

The people are confused, it's a fact. So it is confusing. Stop gaslighting people.

Yes. But definitely not this year.

AI is trained on a various range of code quality, including very low one.

I'm paid to provide good quality code and not flood my company with more average code than it should.

In my previous job, I could regularly reduce a PR code down to 10-20%% of its size because someone overlooked something or was just "overengineer" a feature.

AI are such "bullshiters" that they produce more text than necessary.

Code bloat was already real, but from my personal experience it becomes realer with AI. The outcome of this will likely be apparent when no one can dive into any code base because of the amount of fluff in it (and you will obviously need more AI to deal with this).

why wouldn't they just sell it?

Serious question, is there any kind of entities that can be owned, but not "dismantled", if you don't want it you need to try to sell or make it independant.

Would there be any chance to make it a thing when a company is bought?

This is incredibly helpful. Thank you!

Sorry for the slight off-topic:

Is there any standard protocol/format for "layers" that could be added to such Map apps?

Let's say I want to write a plugin to add my own kind of data, and then I want to export this new kind of data so that someone can import them.

Or I want to create a website with my own data on top of existing one.

I know it's just a blog post, but I wish I knew what "level" of mold and roaches we are talking about.

Seeing mold in joints is not unusual depending on the conditions, but it's also easily fixable.

For cockroaches either there is none in your area, either get one in a year "by mistake", but if it's a recurring events the problem is likely food or garbage that sits longer than it should.

Maybe because they want contributions.

They have probably enough _bigger_ projects that dogfoods it.

I don’t think changing from zig to rust suddenly means that don’t know what a certain file contains or how it works or how it relates to other files.

What if there was some malicious code within the 1 million lines?

Now I can!

I quadruple checked and I can't see it anywhere.

Worth mentioning that the whole git history is gone, the Rust code does not have any human crafted history, which entirely defeat its purpose.

Also, with a million line of code unreviewed by humans, there could be some sneaky backdoor in it.

This makes me think that people are actually under-reacting to this Bun rewrite.

Using a programming language is not the same as using a service.

I can't seen any reason for this to be "the biggest issue".

It's a really cute idea.

Could see how many kid stories you would be able to make and read on a tablet.

To create records for more than one domain, you need to write a personal support email.

I'm not all familiar with this so I don't understand why it's not a ticket or any other non-automated action even for a single domain ?

I mean what is "the standard" that would actually allow a robot to register a domain to a DNS registry ?

The DNS was mostly an example, I'm very ignorant regarding the network stack, but I would naively believe that the administrator of the internet router would have the ability to filter a lot of content without the client to be able to bypass it.

Like at work there are some website I cannot visit, and I'm not sure I can change DNS to change that (but maybe I can, I've never tried).

This is such hackernews comment.

Not everything is about money.

I can use Pgbackrest in my side project which does not generate any money. Maybe my side project is another open source project where no one give me money, but I'm still contributing to the open source ecosystem, maybe I reported bugs which help everyone.

There are so may details and possible reasons to not give money and use open source software, but your negative and naive comment totally miss them.

Penalizing people is slow and does not scale as much as AI creations that can be mass produced.