HN user

kopos

160 karma
Posts1
Comments96
View on HN

We were talking to the reptile caretaker at the Abu Dhabi zoo and we learnt that

- snakes are actually cuties. And more like babies. They do not have strong fight or flight ability like mammals. If they get hurt, they go into a corner and just give up

- they're extremely misunderstood beings. When a snake is hissing, it is because it it actually very very frightened.

- their eye sight is very very bad. They detect mostly by that body heat. And they've a very hard time detecting friends vaa foes. A ball python actually curls into a ball when tensed up. The caretaker had to pet the snake to help it relax.

- most of that snakes are non venomous.

The comments here are needlessly pessimistic and dismissive of a new data flow paradigm. In fact, this looks like the best NoSQL experience there is. SQL while is a standard now, had to prove itself many times over and also was a result of a massive push by few big tech backers.

Rama still looks like it needs some starter examples - that is all.

From what i could gather reading the documentation over few weeks... Rama is an engine supporting Stored Procedure over NoSQL systems. That point alone is worth a million bucks. I hope it lives up to the promise.

Now back to my coding :D

I’ve have used ChatGPT for

- De-obfuscate a obfuscated JS code

- Unminify a JS code. Asked it to guess function names based on the functionality

- Work with it like a rubber duck to plan out the possible solutions to a code problem

- To suggest function names based on the functionality

- To name repos

- Modify a piece of Go code to add specific functionality to it. I don’t know to write Go; I can read it and grok the high level functionality

Functional programming combined with the process dependency tree of Erlang.

Up until a point functional programming with PHP or Python were always littered with small state time bombs which could change at any point in time. Only after thinking about state explicitly in Erlang based programming, was it clear how the state enclosed in OOPS is a total digression from reasoning about state and behavior separately.

Python, Erlang and then Clojure

On the contrary, I've seen product teams assume the pain of the consumer and relay the same to engineering; and then engineers having to push back on the insane requirements.

Nevertheless, product which work in an agile model without collaborating with tech is doomed to fail

Brother, my 2nd startup was 5 years old, lost a ton of money and time. Had to kill it and pivot to a 3rd one at 36. This one is doing better, much better.

It is tough. But if there was no risk involved in doing a startup wouldn’t every tom, dick and Harry have done it already? You put yourself through big risk for asymmetric gains, isn’t it? This pain is the risk that played out this time.

Just take a break; get onto the salary wagon for a few months; gain back your mental peace and confidence and then come back.

Right. Having the client handle everything only after receiving events / data from server works great for a long time till one comes against the real-time multiplayer games. Without doing some lerping on the client side the client is always going to run a few ticks behind the server.

There are far too many variables to say that server side calculation is the only real way to program.

Thanks 4 the AMA.

How many projects did you launch before you arrived at these top 4?

How do you arrive at an idea worth pursuing?

Where do you start?

How long do you spend before you chuck off a project not worth pursuing more?

My “impression” of class based comes from the usage that defrecord was to be inside a defmodule only; not as free floating records.

About the tooling definitely yes. Elixir is pretty pretty good; at compile, build and employ time.

Having worked with both to create the same system (building a game server) I've found Clojure actually sits better with the functional thinking style (1 data structure, 100 functions).

While Phoenix was the killer app for Elixir, and Elixir has far superior readability (using the Ruby syntax); there were couple of things that were off-putting and I struggled with them.

1. everything is inside a module was an unnecessary distraction

2. And then the separation between anonymous and named functions simply were unnecessary

3. And that I would have to declare the data / record inside a module (??)

Elixir felt like a functional language un-necessarily trying to look like a class based language.

I sometimes feel that had Elixir had only supported functions outside of modules... oh that freedom.

But some of the thought that went into Flow, Channels (which has become the de riguere now), mix (developer ergonomics ftw), those micro-second latency responses, distillery are still too classy and amazing.

When the govt "prints money", the govt takes on new debt against which it issues the currency notes, isn't it?

It is still the govt's word that the taxes, GDP etc will grow over time to pay off those debts which it owes to the central bank, isn't it?