HN user

konamicode

47 karma
Posts6
Comments31
View on HN

What would be a good strategy to prevent companies from cottoning on to this and gaming the system? They could for example change packaging on production runs for a product that’s undergoing laboratory.love funding campaign.

VS's windowing system is better than Rider's. I often use VS with a layout which takes up two full screens (editor on one and Tests Explorer/Solution Explorer/Output Window/Find window etc on the other). I haven't yet found a way to replicate this in Rider.

Same position here. Pro is compelling because I own an old iPad mini that's due an upgrade and I wonder if Pro would provide that for me. But for size I like my current SE gen 1.

Unlike in C# pattern matching in F# is exhaustive. I’m guessing this is what was meant by “better”.

I have a 2008 MB (first of the unibody models) and it would be OK if not for hardware no longer being supported by the newer versions of macOS. This means I am unable to install .NET Core 2.0 or some of the newer Node versions which is a shame.

Miller Columns 8 years ago

My default VS layout is to have two full screens: editor on the left screen where I often have a source file and its tests open side by side and on the right screen - the source tree, the test runner, the output window, team explorer etc.

This can work well if you are in an environment like the Google Summer of Code program. It's much harder to do this if you don't have a mentor or two who would be able to spot your mistakes and guide you in the right direction. For many engineers out there they would not have the same set up. Someday I would love to help out somebody with something ambitious but I feel like I need to learn a ton before I am in that position.