ke4qqq

As the cited ‘boss’ I’ll say the publicity wasn’t the concern. The concern was that someone wanted to use our services and we had made that so frustrating that they were writing blog posts about how it had gone wrong.

The various teams (anti-fraud and support) are investigating how we failed this customer so we can improve and hopefully keep this from happening again. (This is the ‘Correction of Error’ process that’s being worked on. And CoE’s aren’t a punitive ‘blame session’ - it’s figuring out how a problem happened and how we can fix or avoid it systemically going forward).

To be fair, the publicity did mean that multiple people were flagging this and driving escalations around it.

You say that like it's a problem. Isn't the point of open source to be able to share so that others can take advantage of a solution to a given problem?

Good video of a presentation from Lee Cheng earlier this year here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X-yUZW-v0io

CC-BY IMO, as a content license it most closely matches the ASL that Docker is released under.

If it doesn't, then LOPSA will rapidly become irrelevant IMO. Times are changing, and just like the move to x86 servers, and virtualization, the DevOps culture and it's resulting tools are an inevitable shift.

CloudStack has it's own well-documented API.

Today, CloudStack uses a separate translation layer, and has for some time, to translate AWS API to CloudStack API. That will remain the same going forward, except the translation layer will become a bit more integrated.