I skimmed the plan and didn't find any requirement to use a ground to water heat pump. Air to water devices are mentioned several times as viable heat pumps for this plan. These do not require boreholes.
HN user
karottenreibe
All of this thread I read so far is complaining on a very high level. Compare the teams era to the pre teams era where companies often either had no meeting software and experience at all and onsite visits or phone calls was the only option, or they used Skype for business which was arguably even worse. Then the minor annoyances of teams seem small in comparison.
That's not too say these things shouldn't be improved, but bundling teams with office for free sure made my communications with most of my customers 1000% easier.
GP said that we do have a society right now where economics is a eugenic factor. Please name one instance of the pattern you described in society today. I'm not aware of any tax on generic markers.
So switch to Firefox and continue enjoying it after Mv3
Yes, let's write everything in assembly language. Only the real pros will dare touch that! /s
Complex to understand code does not entail high quality of maintainers. Quite the opposite in my experience.
I'm not using it but still interested and would have appreciated the year in the title.
How can you change heating from gas to oil without exchanging the central heating device and installing oil storage canisters in every das heated home? How is that achievable on short notice?
Trust in this context is obviously not 1 or 0 but a sliding scale and some organizations are higher on that scale than others based on past conduct, as the previous poster pointed out at length.
If you don't trust anyone but yourself, you'll have to do the audit yourself. How do you suggest to do that? An auditor with a good track record seems like the most trustworthy practically feasible alternative to me.
That sounds unlikely
How did the Nazis conquer Germany in your opinion? The point applies at least there.
Sold to consumers vs sold to a company would suffice as a distinction IMO.
Source?
That's a strawman. You're conflating async with no communication. There's perfectly fine asynchronous communication methods. You have to communicate differently on async, not stop communicating.
The reason cash is predominant in Germany is not privacy concerns but horrendous fees for every transaction for smaller shops like bakeries. So the small shops often enough don't offer card payment that you simply have to keep cash on you. I have never met anyone that payed in cash because they want the privacy it offers. Quite on the contrary: people regularly complain about having to pay in cash.
My go-to is using -o and pre/appending .{100} to the pattern to capture however much context I need
You can hide your self view in Meet since some months now. I even made a user script to do so automatically.
Has the disadvantage that you can't index content of sites where you need to be logged in as you don't have access to the browser's cookies
Why do you believe the same thing can't be achieved with packages in node that you feel is so useful for multi team orgs in your DLL scenario?
Actually, in Germany Christmas already starts 12/24, so even this seemingly simplistic example is more complex of you support the entire world. Dates are hard.
In my experience you absolutely SHOULD document every request and removal in e.g. an issue tracker. It's very valuable information.
And commented out code gets stale so quickly. Much better to check out an old version where it still worked than uncommenting a bunch of lines that now have compile errors and have become incomprehensible. Happens so easily, e.g. after some variable renames.
What sort of compilation problem would that be that's only solvable by manually running javac outside your IDE?
Can you please make or link to one example? I'd be interested to learn more.
It's certainly a better argument than the GPs claim of "the safest cars out there" with 0 evidence given to substantiate that. I think it fair to refute such an unsubstantiated claim with a reported instance where safety was not maintained as can reasonably be expected.
That's never gonna happen.
I bet a few concave mirrors can get the job done!
The question wasn't whether sender and receiver know each other but whether the government can find out both. Totally different scenario.
I wouldn't call HN an "end user forum". So I think this content fits very well with the crowd here.
This article is contradicting you and specifically linking to this other article in the first paragraph as proof: https://jalopnik.com/consumer-reports-shows-how-easy-it-is-t...
It's a bit more dramatic if you look at cost of living again as GP did. Numbeo again:
You would need around 3,309.51$ (12,912.27zł) in Warsaw to maintain the same standard of life that you can have with 8,500.00$ in San Francisco, CA (assuming you rent in both cities).
Or, you know, in an unbreakable box of a business whose reputation depends on keeping it safe. Like a security deposit box in a bank? That doesn't sound unreasonable to me.
In contrast, comparing 1password to "a stranger three towns over" or "the sidewalk" seems a bit unfair to me.