karavelov

So what happened to FTC in 2025 that it’s not doing anymore consumer protection?

Even on older system types, you can provision .metal sizes and run anything on them.

Article says he was born in 1770s, so his missing father can be Loyalist

I guess they also want expertise to launch stuff into space

Blue Origin is Jeff Bezos' private aerospace company

Yes, in the submodules of `std::arch`

I am sorry to break the news, but UK is not in EU, so registering a company in UK is of the same effect as registering it anywhere else outside EU

Well, the configuration changes during takeoff mitigate the issue if it happens during takeoff. If it happens at any other time then they don’t do anything to help.

There are no birds at higher altitudes

Waiting for Sabine's comment: "Told you so, physics is dead"

It's just 6P + 8E + 2IO (ultra efficient) cores or less. Looks it's primary targeting laptops.

For interop between runtimes, they need to add `std::async` IO traits that could be implemented by each runtime.

why not switch to bird that was not affected at all? not just acknowledged and fixed. isn’t it “safe be default” better than “fixed after they pointed the flaw”

These are emulated `r1000` devices, not pass-through

I was using the same technique back in the day when I was maintaining my Pentax MXs but using a fluorescent lamp as a source - they blink with the AC power cycle - 50 or 60Hz depending on your country.

The cost of the CPU is small part of a server TCO. Graviton instances could be cheaper because the platform is cheaper, uses less power and needs less cooling - I think we know from Apple Silicon that ARM chips can have these advantages.

Disclaimer: I work for AWS but I don't have any internal knowledge about Graviton pricing and non-public performance data.

I am a Linux user, and I gave on Thunderbird due to terrible Exchange support - now I use Evolution, it has its own problems but my calendar is synced.

P.S. No my choice to use Exchange on the server side.

It matters actually, if your each tasks use 10KiB stack for execution, and you have 1000 tasks, with threads that will consume 12MiB just for the stacks (+2KiB per task due to page alignment). If you use async runtime as Tokio the stack is un-rolled on each suspend point. So if you have 16 worker threads, that means the stacks will consume 192 KiB.

Would GDPR request under Article 15 work to get your data out?

What is the difference with https://github.com/rust-lang/datafrog? It’s a Datalog engine written by Frank McSherry on top of differential dataflow, that’s used here also

Miele - more expensive than Dyson though.

It crashes on Ubuntu 20.04 also with `memory allocation of 18446744073709551615 bytes failed`

PerformanceTest software only runs on Windows OS

I think this excludes huge population of servers as we know Windows is not dominant there.

I guess they have to populate the time range column.

Yes, this is how I learned programming Basic, assembly, Turbo Pascal (CP/M) and C on Pravetz 82M and 16. It was fun time. Some models of Pravetz 16 had a NEC CPU clone that was running substantially faster, if my memory serves me well 12 MHz vs 4 MHz for the Intel.

They were widely available in the education system and there were optional classes to learn programming.

Edit: I forgot the Pravetz 8D a friend had - they were available for purchase fro individuals. It had 4 channel audio synth and I programmed on it a drum-box for my teen rock band.

Naming fields is a small pain, the PITA is that JSON does not have native encoding for enum/variant/sum types. So now there are multiple ways to encode them: internally tagged, externally tagged, adjacently tagged, implicit/untagged. And JSON schema does not solve that at all: you can write schemas for all of them, but they do not convey the same information in the end languages even if they have all the type capabilities.

Email hosting does not share your inbox with 3rd parties.

You can run service using AGPL software, you just have to open source your modifications.

On first generation Ryzen AVX2 instructions were executed as 2 AVX instructions as the AVX pipeline was 128 bits wide. This was fixed in Zen 2 and nowadays we are at Zen 3.

Type parameters are decided by the use of the type. The associated types are decided by the implementation of the type. Type params are input, associate type are output.

No support for sum types? I didn't see even simple unions covered.

Similarly you can compile Rust in "edition = 2015" or "edition = 2018" and soon "edition = 2021" to guard against changes in the language, e.g. adding keywords.

There are already alternative compilers, though most of them are WIP, e.g. mrustc[1], rust front-end for gcc[2][3], or using cranelift[4] for the back-end.

[1] https://github.com/thepowersgang/mrustc

[2] https://github.com/sapir/gcc-rust/tree/rust

[3] https://github.com/Rust-GCC/gccrs

[4] https://github.com/bjorn3/rustc_codegen_cranelift