great, i'll try this. something like this has on my list and i'm super curious :)
HN user
kaeluka
They're trying to make the product sticky while they're still subsidizing the subscription price. The plan is to raise prices when you're addicted.
it's sort of good at thinking, writing specs, etc.. Also debugging. But as a coder: I see no advantage to opus 4.6 and I preferred sonnet most times already over opus 4.6.
Thanks for the tip, started out really interesting!
That blog entry is well worth reading. It put a smile on my face! :-)
No idea what rights you'd have in the US, I'm not a citizen :-)
Sure, I thought that was obvious.
In Chrome: right-click, inspect. Edit page source. Done. Less than two minutes, and you don't need to have a tech background to do it.
Never trust screenshots.
Weird coincidence, that's just what NASA just tweeted:
I'll never forget the day my mother called to tell me that their cat had died in an accident, suffering. I was (technically) grown up then, and it was many years ago, but it still hurts. Writing this hurts :(
If it wasn't for the cats we had when I was a kid, I'd be a different person today :')
It can run using a number of solvers, you can find a list here: http://www.minizinc.org/software.html
Stiftskeller St. Peter is much older, according to this list: before 803.
The feature is called "intrinsics", this claims to be a list: https://gist.github.com/apangin/7a9b7062a4bd0cd41fcc
What's the mathematical formula that describes a text box GUI item? Languages that look like math might be great for... mathematical problems. But programs are much more than math.
I was confused -- how can a library add a keyword like "coroutine" to C. It didn't look like macros were powerful enough to do that (I expected to at least some context having to be passed to the worker, or so).
It turns out that a coroutine is just a function that the compiler should not inline: https://github.com/sustrik/libmill/blob/master/libmill.h#L24...
I don't follow your examples. How is workout-equipment:gym like uber:taxi-firm?
non-progressive
I'm not sure what you mean by progress, exactly, but policy simplicity is progress IMHO.
I'm trying racket.
In an ideal world, what you want is more like copy-on-write. Share the code until one of the clients of that code needs a change that the others do not, then copy it.
Good point. The problem with that is, of course, that you may not be aware of others existing.
There is no silver bullet...
+1
Code duplication can be seen as a "defensive copy". If you duplicate code, the original version can be changed without breaking the copies.
Disclaimer: I'm not making a value statement here :-)
From a european perspective it's so strange.
Agreed. To me, it seems that encryption should be uncontroversially accepted from the populations's standpoint, while gun policies have valid arguments for and against.
Basically: it's really hard to shoot someone in the face with pgp.
The daughter doesn't support it
What beer was it? :-)
How would you challenge other five eyes nations spying on you and sharing the conclusions with your government? I'm not trying to point out you're wrong, it's a serious question.
My take: "a statically typed language can GUARANTEE the same things a dynamic language can GUARANTEE, but not the other way around. A dynamically typed language can PERMIT the same things a static language can PERMIT, but not the other way round."
It's a fantastic talk. One of the best talks on programming that I'm aware of.
I saw it as an option, but an unlikely one.
No offence, but you sound like you haven't worked in or close to such a field. CS theory very often doesn't require coding at all, and coding would be barely helpful.
edit: this is not a value statement.
Thanks, that convinced me :)
Unless two actors share state, or use global mutable state.
I agree with a well funded government. I don't always agree with how government spends the money, but that is kind of the point. Governments should guarantee a minimum standard and equal starting conditions for everyone, capitalism raise the roof. Both are vital.