HN user

kademolu

3 karma

Cyber architecture and engineering leader building AI-native systems for security, resilience, and agent evaluation.

I work at the intersection of cybersecurity architecture, platform engineering, deterministic simulation, and AI agents. My GitHub profile (https://github.com/bluntmachetti) is my public proof-of-work space: small but serious systems, benchmarks, field notes, and experiments that explore how complex AI-enabled organisations can be tested before they touch real infrastructure, customers, or money.

Posts1
Comments4
View on HN

Lets separate "workers" from "decision seats", you might need a lot of workers which typically don't actual require inference and might actually just be cheap solvers but actually less decision seats. So i guess it depends on what you are calling agents in your scenario.

What a lot of people seem to miss is that you don't need the openweight models to "beat" frontier models for most agentic workloads. The harness should be doing the majority of the work, inference becomes the value add. This is where chinese models shine, i have run benchmarks where the value per dollar is always tilted to the chinese models