jrave

:chef's kiss:

i think this is a fascinating comment that highlights how tactical successes may turn to dust in the medium and long term - and also how the intention behind an action may often not be relevant to practical effects at all, since transitive consequences override the primary outcome (if it was even well calculated in the first place).

since this would be very meaningful for my understanding and reasoning about many social fields such as business or politics, i‘d like to know whether you have source material that supports the premise? is this a grounded concept or more of an ad hoc observation

i had only skimmed this link and not even wondered about the name - but learned the meaning serendipitously within 2 minutes when it popped up in the OTHER hackernews link i had opened: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48118478 which links to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/England_runestones

Futhark appears in the first paragraph! i don't think i ever read the term before

dastardly

this completely sucked me in after skimming half a paragraph while unsure what to expect. very golden age, thanks for the link!

maybe you misread the post you‘re answering to here or are you suspecting sarcasm? the poster commended your usage of the footnote with the gemini convo as far as i can tell?

helix (https://helix-editor.com/) is using treesitter and LSP as well