Instructions unclear. Stuck in comments.
HN user
jondtaylor
Sonny = typo.
You should try to reverse sha256. If you can do it ill give you $100.
I appreciate your comment the most. If you want something then make it happen. Don't wait for the slow crawl of society to take you where you want to go.
One of the team members was a co founder of the Raspberry pi.
I assume compression will be used for http content for serving content. I wouldn't be surprised if they include a few algorithms.
This is a dev kit not a commercial offering...
I noticed this in the blurb:
"Remember, keep it concise, yet personal. Ask yourself: if someone stopped reading here would they be ready to make a contribution?"
I find it humorous that there are no comments for this.
Post it on HN.
What would the omlette be in this analogy?
2004?
I had to read your comment three times. 'Think' is the word your looking for.
People can use escrow for some customer protection. It worked out well for me the last time I ordered from bitmit.
Not necessarily. The fractional reserve system is rigged in the sense that to use it you must borrow at interest where the interest can not be paid back resulting in assets transferred to the creators of the currency. Bitcoin does not have this property. In my opinion the system of Bitcoin isn't rewarding certain people over others, that is a property of the market.
Funny timing. I just finished watching a video on the decline on the US dollar in global trade. Here is a link: http://hiddensecretsofmoney.com/
I like the idea. I'm also wondering about the notion of deprecating laws that no longer function as they did when introduced or don't address the issue it was intended for.
Just a little background, this is an FTP client that is very simple, caches content for fast response and syncs files locally for backup. It's windows only and is an experiment for me to test the market for interest. I'd be happy to hear any feedback. Thanks!
What do you mean by "ambulance chasers"?
That's what trust costs...
Business idea right here!
I don't think this is the case. My understanding is that wallets have transactions attached.
I may be mistaken but I don't think Bitcoins (the units themselves) have an identity like that only wallets are entities. It's similar to how a celebrity would drink water and water would be worth more than the rest. Once the debit and credit occurs who is to say which coins are from what source...
Ahh, Thanks.
"However, they are wrong because converting $100 into 10 x $10 bills or even 100 x $1 bills does not make you feel richer."
This was also quoted in a Forbes article but I don't get it. Can someone explain what this means? What does lack liquidity or limited supply have to do with feeling richer by funging your bills?
I'm not joking I seriously have no idea what this has to do with anything...