HN user
I thought the author might just be heavily influenced by the LLM style, but when there are also complete non sequiteurs like
Low frequencies take very few bits to encode, and you feel them as much as hear them
yeah then it starts to smell pretty bad.
The diff of the linked commit in git is completely trivial, clearly it just got tagged because of the signoff in the commit message: https://github.com/git/git/commit/d7971544fe17378f44f4998301...
I would be surprised if there is no LLM-assisted code in there prior to this commit, this is just the first where the author chose to disclose it.
Several and a few are the same number, they only differ rhetorically.
Presumably there is an antialiasing low pass filter somewhere before JS gets to the data. I have a similar sample rate and it certainly didn't work at all for me.
What do you mean by cycles? A ripple-carry adder needs to wait for the carry bits to ripple through yes, but there's no clock cycle involved.
Good to know!
The JSON types are string, number, boolean, null, object and array. So how could the suggested code possibly work? Do you want JSON.parse to do arbitrary code execution like Python's pickle?
Bitbucket is okay to use, the main problem like with every Atlassian product is that it is dog slow.
How do you know what you were downvoted for?
Having a type safe generic ring buffer and such is nice
You definitely need discipline to use C++ in embedded. There are exactly 2 features that come to mind, which makes it worth it for me: 1) replacing complex macros or duplicated code with simple templates, and 2) RAII for critical sections or other kinds of locks.
I have no reason to trust that the fork itself is competently maintained when the author did not even bother to write the announcement.
But it is fine. If I disagree with a project's values I'm not going to contribute to it, and they wouldn't want me there either.
They explain why in their AI policy. It's an ethical stance. Of course they wouldn't notice if there aren't clear signs of LLM-ness, but that's not the main reason why they forbid it.
https://docs.postmarketos.org/policies-and-processes/develop...
It's fine for a project to have moral/ideological leanings, it's only weird if you insist that project teams should be entirely amoral.
Very happy to see PostmarketOS take an uncompromising stance and also providing justification for it.
And I better not see any capacitors on there remembering any charge!
Stuff like that is a good argument for using structured logging, but even if you are just parsing text logs, surely you can make the parser be a bit more specific when retrieving the log level.
Oh that makes sense.
4xx is for invalid requests. You wouldn't log a 404 as an error
Rust is doing great.
Why not? They have been proudly vibe coding for a while.
It's unbelievable to me that Github allows repo admins to edit other people's comments.
This is not an improvement. Having named variables for things is good actually. They will need to be declared again immediately once you want to modify the code. insertCell(i).innerText = c is a nonsense statement, it should be 2 lines for the 2 operations
It's really tough to read through a text where you can't go more than a few sentences without having something be described as *an adjective, a second adjective, and a third adjective*. Just let the code example speak for itself, man.
Speaking of the code examples, I am not convinced at all. The supposedly bad example is idiomatic and understandable to me, and I have a much better idea of what's going on than in the supposedly good examples. It contains the kind of constructions I expect to see when working on a Go codebase, and it will be easier to modify correctly for another Go developer coming in later. Please, work with the language instead of forcing it to wear a programming paradigm it doesn't like.
You can just make stuff up on this website
Yeah that's pretty much what happened last time I tried to reinstall my distro
You can store any data as long as it doesn't contain any ones
What is Flynn factor?