HN user

joliv

176 karma
Posts6
Comments79
View on HN

Some other design elements that stand out to me:

- The transition between dropdowns in the top nav. Really smooth, and something you won't see anywhere else.

- Semi-consistent and sufficiently different color schemes for the different products. See the difference between https://stripe.com/atlas and https://stripe.com/us/sigma.

- Subtle box shadows. They've done this by cranking the blur way up around 30px. For comparison, the Google search bar uses a blur around 1px or 2px.

First, the Court sees Sci-Hub as essentially hosting the copyrighted materials. From the order in ACS v. Does:

...Sci-Hub has copied elements—and, in many cases, the entirety of—those works, and that Sci-Hub has distributed those works by allowing individuals to download the works from its website, all in violation of the Copyright Act.

But to entertain your argument of First Amendment protections, linking to infringing documents is pretty clearly incitement of imminent lawless action as established in Brandenburg.

One of my favorite things is to see a problem I think is trivial and learn its hidden complexities, like the "X things developers think about Y" series of articles.

However, to take the parent's example of an HTML doc with an associated script...the browser does do this, and a rebuttal has to reckon with that. My Chrome web browser runs on thousands of different devices, countless OSs. A small Hello World file can run _with_ a header that supports RTL languages, can very simply say what version of HTML it's using (doctype yadda yadda...I grant that the situation is considerably more complex for JS nowadays!), and can run in any browser size imaginable. It doesn't have a "large library" of useful layouts—the developer just includes what they need. Yes, I'm sure running native on the phone brings many difficulties browser apps don't have to deal with, but from the comment alone I'm not sure what those are beyond signing.

I'm willing to bet Damore would win his case with the NLRB if not for the new Trump members that will be on the board by the time he gets there. Eager to see some deal with their simultaneous passion for speech freedoms and disdain for the only remedy here—strengthening labor protections.

I don't think this disagrees completely with the cited source!

So, I say, don't talk to the cops. Ask to speak with an attorney, and get competent advice before you answer the cops' questions. Are there mundane situations in which you might rationally decide to talk to the cops — say, if a neighbor's house is burglarized, and they come to ask if you saw anything? Sure. But you should view each interaction with the cops with an extreme caution bordering on paranoia, as you would handle a dangerous wild animal.

From Ken White, https://www.popehat.com/2014/01/15/the-privilege-to-shut-up/

It _is_ a Disney ride! I've ridden on it—tons of fun.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_Tours

The technical description:

Star Tours utilizes hydraulic motion base cabins featuring six degrees of freedom, including the ability to move 35 degrees in the X-Y-Z plane. The simulator was patented as Advanced Technology Leisure Application Simulator (ATLAS), originally designed by Rediffusion Simulation[8] in Sussex, England, now owned by Thomson-CSF. The Rediffusion 'Leisure' simulator was originally developed for a much simpler show in Canada called "Tour of the Universe", where it featured a single entrance/exit door in the rear of the cabin and a video projector. The film is front-projected onto the screen from a 70 mm film projector located beneath the cockpit barrier. The Disneyland original has four simulators, while the shows in Tokyo Disneyland, Disneyland Paris, and WDW Disney's Hollywood Studio each have six motion bases.

RedditStorage 11 years ago

Wikipedia is a bit more vigilant with banning than abandoned blogs are :)