What makes you think Paul Graham knows what he's talking about re: space, data centers, and the logistics of lifting data centers into space and the ongoing maintenance of them. I don't understand the deification his thoughts receive around here.
HN user
johneth
The other parties aren't standing in this particular byelection because they (correctly) realise that it's just a media stunt by Farage, who is attempting to paint himself as a victim of establishment harassment (while being the epitome of 'the establishment' himself). By not standing, and forcing Farage to run against joke candidates, they've made a fool of him (which generally harms populists more than anything else you can throw at them).
The other parties have all said that they will run candidates against Farage in the almost inevitable second byelection that will by triggered later when parliament finishes its investigation into his corruption and punishes him for it.
If you go in with the assumption that democracy does not work, then there is also no point in protesting
You mean peaceful protesting. There are other kinds of protesting that may have better success.
i’m convinced we’re going to find out at some point they’re all on some kind of modern meth type drug that entirely breaks their reality
It's called being out-of-touch obscenely wealthy coupled with a massive ego.
It is extremely difficult for me to care about the fate of private schools. In my opinion, they shouldn't exist. If the rich are forced to send their children to the same schools as everyone else, maybe they'll pressure the government to improve said schools.
Out of pure curiosity, which UK bank was it?
I think "over-18" posts on X within the feed are hidden behind a "please verify your age" button if you've not verified your age (in UK and parts of EU, probably Australia too). They're intermixed with non-hidden posts.
X lets post authors mark their content as NSFW, and I'd assume they're doing some sort of algorithmic checking or making use of user reports of content to classify content too, to varying degrees of success. It's definitely subject to the whims of the platform owner, given the sheer amount of racism, sexism, and porn that isn't marked.
My account is >18 years old so it never showed up for me (it just used the account age to determine I'm old enough), so I'm going by what others have said.
Completely ignoring all the ways in which space data centers are fucking infeasible for a moment.
Just because there are no laws in space, you still need to launch your rockets from a place that has laws.
I've just been implementing a bunch of URL-related utility functions in Go. Decided the most pragmatic solution of handling IPv6 addresses in URL hosts is to outright reject zone identifiers because of the ambiguity in how to parse / serialize them, and the inconsistent ways others have done it (or most of the time, not done it).
RFC 3986 says "This syntax does not support IPv6 scoped addressing zone identifiers." Makes sense because '%' is a reserved character for percent encoding (hence the %25 that Go's net/url expects).
The URL Standard explicitly states "Support for <zone_id> is intentionally omitted."
The stock market is not about future results, it's about gambling, especially over the last decade.
If you buy the "AI DCs in space" pitch, you deserve to be parted from your money.
All good points, but I think their main point of poor governance is still the pure motivation.
You can change the audio track back to the original.
Not sure if it remembers your preference, though, so if it doesn't that probably grates.
Why is it their job to evaluate a 1m+ line code rewrite?
All it takes is one determined journalist running experiments, or one whistleblower inside the company exposing these systems.
Plus, you'd have to offer this service somehow, meaning you'd have to describe it to potential customers... just another bunch of people you'd have to swear to perpetual secrecy.
I'm not denying it could (or even will) happen, though. Anything for a buck for these companies.
I wouldn't be surprised if there isn't some sort of legal action against Google, the monopoly, to make the distinction in how their crawlers use scraped content.
That's almost certainly illegal in many jurisdictions, and they'd definitely not be able to hide that they're doing it indefinitely. A sure way to be massively sued.
A lot of the time they hallucinate the sources, too.
Are you forgetting that you need to launch from one of those "suffocating regulatory states"?
So it's a lot less dumb if 50 really difficult and borderline physically impossible things happen. On the word of a conman. Right.
The people who control the capital are building autonomous armament to protect themselves against both foreign and domestic enemies.
Rich people can build all the fortified bunkers they want, but they still need to get their food, water, and air from somewhere. It would be very easy to cut them off or smoke them out.
(I'm not advocating for violence in any way, I'm just pointing out that nobody's invincible, no matter how obscenely wealthy they are).
It may be incompetent malice.
Anyway, there is no sense to listen to Trump. TACO is a thing.
It's never a good idea to disregard something just because you want it to be true.
Trump's done a lot of shit that he said he'd do (tariffs, capturing foreign leaders, wars of choice). He's incredibly stupid. You can't predict stupid people.
It's easy to cancel a direct debit / standing order from internet banking.
Providing Internet to the entire world that's faster than fiber.
Bullshit. You're not going to be faster than fiber from orbit, with congested bandwidth.
Providing space launch capability that's 1/10th what NASA charges.
NASA isn't in the commercial launch space.
Providing quite good AI at 100 tokens/sec.
It's the weakest of the slop machines.
I would assume most sites that block access to your AI assistant do so because they want to show a human ads, i.e. not run at a loss. Seems reasonable.
This is ultimately just going to give them training material for how to avoid this crap.
The arms race just took another step, and if you're spending money creating or hosting this kind of content, it's not going to make up for the money you're losing by your other content getting scraped.
So we should all just do nothing and accept the inevitable?
this seems anachronistic, written for a human artisan laboring over each naming choice directly
Some of us want to write well thought-through code, rather than letting an AI just spew poorly thought-through unmaintainable shit.
Re: the design of the site. Please use higher contrast colours, especially the barely visible grey text on black background. It's annoying to try to read.
I think the county list is set in stone because Royal Mail refuses to update them (for some idiotic reason they still control the postcode database, which I guess lots of websites use and therefore use the old county names / boundaries). For example, it's still Humberside, even though that hasn't existed for decades.