john_alan

I’ve been using ARM Debian desktop stably for a long time. I don’t see what the issue is, am I missing something or is this just his hardware choice?

yep, dripping in AI.

It's a real problem, so many projects are adding features at breakneck speed, but with so many bugs and so little understanding.

Maybe that's just how it all works now, but I don't like it.

What you've said is emotionally compelling, but scientifically very weak. Personal recollection is selective and location-specific. You’ve described a memory, not established a mechanism.

What you perceive as change isn't macro, it's micro.

It doesn't mean macro change isn't happening, but it's not happening on our timescale.

I'm 50 FWIW.

Climate also doesn't change in macro over a lifetime.

It's very real, but the notion that it's changing over a 5 year period is nonsense.

things aren't "shutting off".

yep aren't most fridges and ovens etc using 386DXs?

Maybe it's all ARM Cortex now? I thought the 386 was still in production.

Great now just need the same for the window corners and ridiculous Finder overlays.

I am repulsed by Tahoe's new design language.

I live in the vain hope that macOS 27 restores some sanity, at least maybe removes these clownish corner radiuses.

It makes the entire OS look like the Palm Pre's app switcher.

Macbooks don't even have Nvidia in them.

lol!

it's too slow for usable inference though.

same, but will it change?

GPT-OSS-120 works well.

you can't run models that are bigger than 16GB, not comparable.

sure the GPU isn't 4090 tier in compute, but the memory let's you run 120bn param models at usable speeds.

https://tilde.team FTW

Use containerd , Docker is cancer.

If iOS/macOS 27 isn't a snow leopard I'm gone too, I've been a user for nearly 30 decades... fuck this, it's all so sloppy, too many grievances to even begin enumerating.

Tahoe is a nightmare. I’m Literally not buying a new Mac because of it.

Dye destroyed macOS. I don’t know what they do, but they have to backtrack.

that's fair ya

_A Mac with Apple silicon doesn’t permit native arm64 code to execute unless a valid signature is attached. This signature can be as simple as an ad hoc code signature (cf. codesign(1)) that doesn’t bear any actual identity from the secret half of an asymmetric key pair (it’s simply an unauthenticated measurement of the binary)._

_For binary compatibility, translated x86_64 code is permitted to execute through Rosetta with no signature information at all. No specific identity is conveyed to this code through the device-specific Secure Enclave signing procedure, and it executes with precisely the same limitations as native unsigned code executing on an Intel-based Mac._

Maybe it's Rosetta bins? - src from Apple:

https://support.apple.com/en-gb/guide/security/secebb113be1/...

yes, and I grew up with 1.0/3.1

cause I use it 12 hours a day?

hmmm this is really bizarre.

are you running < 15.1?

this is completely false, compile a binary strip the signature and see for yourself.

AS requires code sign with adhoc, minimum.

Anyone still using Windows for anything but gaming is an idiot.

your spelled iTerm2 wrong :)

who uses browser level Adblockers anymore?

Just use Pihole.

Traveling? VPN home then Pihole

lol. I work in Applied cryptography and I don’t know a harder distributed system built on such a broad spectrum of primitives which has seen such high uptime.

Are you qualified to speak on this topic?

Shock: company selling quills says printing press bad for humans.

right, plus the anonymity set size, plus the original trusted setup (now largely resolved)

I work in applied cryptography and XMR is my preferred cryptocurrency.