jdironman

Hella Large - Large Hadron Collider?

Thank you for this article link! I had not seen it before. will be printing it off to read later.

I'm of a strong believer that AI just isn't (may never will be?) a strong judge and executor of "quality". Quality is a loaded term though. Are there any objectively good game designs? Even if there is, maybe only one game of 10 that use the same 'blue print' every reach critical mass (popularity).

probably someone testing their android hacker news client. maybe.

Roger that, over.

That is actually really nice. I'm glad you showed me this! and not sure how I missed this when originally searching. Thanks!

Ah, sorry about that! I think my cloudflare rules might have been a little too aggressive! You should be able to try again if you want. Thanks for checking it out

The real NFTs where the images we generated along the way

I think they mean what is the actual vulnerability and not the score.

Reminds me a lot of when I used to deploy this (DataseamGrid) on K12 computers. I was actually just discussing this scenario with a friend.

https://www.dataseam.org/research/

Could be a symptom of poor stimulation regulation. I know that's the problem in my case. if I have a phone, screen, or even a book in front of me I can stay up until tomorrow. But, if I shut it all down (roughly 30 to 60 mins) before I actually plan to try and sleep it absolutely causes the tiredness to kick in.

I will say there are varying degrees of stimulation. Computer use > TV > Book reading > Music > silence and boredom. At least that is the order in which I shutdown on the nights I have the motivation to do so.

I think computational thinking, or basically "how do I solve this problem efficiently" training data is more valuable then feeding in answers. I don't know what these AI models training data consist of, but it would be interesting to see a model trained purely on reasoning, methods, those foundational skills (basic programming? or maybe not) and then give it some benchmarks.

if you were on the development team of that game I send my biggest thanks out to you. it was one of the few things me and my (hard to bond with) father bonded over growing up. We would play I think ..course 2 or 3 with the insanity level bikes ALL night trying to get out times down to something like 1 1/2 minutes. within ms of each other's times. run after run. so thanks.

Ideally at least a few pages in length. I'm trying to limit scroll reading by printing out talks, lectures, long form articles that lend themselves well to paper. But, I don't know where to find these gems like the linked one that showed in today's Tony Hoare main thread.

So what's your favorite(s)?

From the linked lecture, which I printed out to read as part of a new less is more screen time management regime (where I print out longer form writing for reading) I found this very interesting tidbit in the context of Tony having made a delivery miscalculation and his team failing to deliver on one of their products; which is where I think a lot people are today with LLMs:

"Each of my managers explained carefully his own theory of what had gone wrong and all the theories were different. At last, there breezed into my office the most senior manager of all, a general manager of our parent company, Andrew St. Johnston. I was surprised that he had even heard of me.

"You know what went wrong?" he shouted--he always shouted -- "You let your programmers do things which you yourself do not understand." I stared in astonishment. "

Zero trust policy is slowly making its way into every day life. Maybe for the best? Trust the people you can talk to, feel, see.

Step one reframe the problem not as an attack or accusation, instead as an observation.

Step two request justification, apply pressure

Step three give them an out by working with you

I think he is saying where is the creativity in the AA+ space. Which still might be a lack of depth / breadth of search, or platform exclusive content. Not everyone can own all the consoles.

The thing I got from reading the majority of these emails is Epstein / trump connection was not that strong later years. I feel JE humored trump to a degree and disliked him to an even larger degree. He may have initially had strong relations in the beginning but he was NOT pleased he was winning the presidency at all. He mentioned multiple times references to dirt on DT and even at one point there was the question did Trump set him up. Not to say JE did no wrong, cause the evidence is 100% there for that but it's super interesting having read the actual files to see the various media spins on all sides. If anything though it's led me to believe there are much stronger ties to Russia with DT than I thought before. (Palm Beach House, the casino, models coming from those areas etc).

I read through 80% of them last night by myself. I mean, I didn't go to bed until 3am but spread across a handful of agents? yeah you could do it in an hour.

This is what they actually use: https://github.com/flavorjones/loofah

Got a chuckle out of me. lol

I am going to give this a shot, but using a method I have been using lately with subagents. Basically, what I do is have it create an Architect, Executor, Adjudicator subagents. Architect breaks any ask down into atomic and testable subtasks that take 1-3 minutes 'dev' time. Executor (can spawn more than one) implements them. Then adjudicator reviews that they are to spec / requirements. This all happens in subagent files + a runbook.json in the .claude folder of a project. Its based on a paper* that was featured on here a while back actually [1].

[1] https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.09030

That's a good question. It was more an example. I am definitely interested in what model people have chosen. A concrete example is I have a cross platform personal finance app. (win, lin, mac). Its not cloud based or anything. So, I am at the point where I want to think about how to license I guess which is what inspired my question.

What about the server portion? that's the thing I would like to have forked / open source.

So much copilot integration just for the sake of it.

Maybe my reading comprehension is failing me, but what does this mean for existing messages? I guess nothing of the have already been 'siphoned' to a 3rd party. As it couldn't retroactively apply to data not under Signals control of course..but what about existing messages already within their control?

This is why multi-pass sessions is something I try sometimes. "What's wrong with the solution your provided, how should it be done instead, and if you use any specific APIs or third party libraries research them to ensure complete accuracy of syntax, usage, and logic simplicity. Refactor your original solution to the correct minimum based on the ask."

Usually after running whatever it first spits out through this I get a bit better of a response or base I can build off of. Really, the best you can do is already know what you want and need and do very targeted sessions. Like the old saying goes, commit small and often.

What happens is the status quo changes. Like what happened with Dev/Ops. If you find yourself with the time to lead agents on a beach retreat you might find yourself pulled into more product design / management meetings instead. AI/Dev like DevOps. Wearing more hats as a result. Maybe I'm wrong though.

I do as well when I see:

# Code Comments Every Few Lines